What do you think?
I was surprised to see a teenage girl fight Grevious!
That was kinda shocking!
I was surprised to see a teenage girl fight Grevious!
That was kinda shocking!
Yeah, Grievous's murder of the scavenger guy was surprising. I believe that's the first overt on-camera death of a living being that we've seen on this show.
Even Anakin, who values R2 as a friend and risks his life to save him, still refers to him as "something that belongs to me." So... he's your friend that you own?
Still annoyed by the attitude toward droids here. Even Anakin, who values R2 as a friend and risks his life to save him, still refers to him as "something that belongs to me." So... he's your friend that you own?
That makes his determination to rescue Artoo seem not so much noble as pathetic, the attitude of an overgrown child who can't let go of his toys.
Something to keep in mind about Anakin's relationship with Artoo is that this droid isn't just his friend (thought the pet analogy is a perfect one). Artoo was also a gift from his wife, and with their obligations and the war keeping them so far apart, the little droid is Anakin's one tangible connection to her despite them having a galaxy separating them.
You see a hint of this in "Downfall of a Droid". Anakin can't explain, even to Ahsoka, why going after Artoo is so very important to him. He has to come up with the excuse that it's because Artoo's carrying information vital to the war effort.
I don't know that it was necessary to spell it out. For starters, the story works without that knowledge (like others in the thread have said, Artoo is like a beloved pet, a friend, but also your property in some sense). Also, even if you weren't aware that Padme gave Artoo to Anakin as a gift, it doesn't take much to figure that out on your own. In Episode I and II, Artoo belongs to Padme. In The Clone Wars and Episode III, Artoo belongs to Anakin. Unless Anakin's in the habit of stealing things from his wife, the little droid became a gift (and in fact, Artoo and Threepio were essentially "wedding rings" that the pair exchanged on their wedding day).Well, since they didn't indicate that in the actual episode, there's no way to know that unless you have an encyclopedic knowledge of the franchise. If something's significant to the episode's story, it needs to be referenced in the story itself. Even if Anakin couldn't tell the other characters, there should've been a flashback or an internal-monologue voiceover or something to put that idea across.
Enjoying the series so far, and wonder if there is any news on the other Star Wars series. Star Wars Insider has had some updates
I don't know that it was necessary to spell it out. For starters, the story works without that knowledge (like others in the thread have said, Artoo is like a beloved pet, a friend, but also your property in some sense).
Also, even if you weren't aware that Padme gave Artoo to Anakin as a gift, it doesn't take much to figure that out on your own. In Episode I and II, Artoo belongs to Padme. In The Clone Wars and Episode III, Artoo belongs to Anakin. Unless Anakin's in the habit of stealing things from his wife, the little droid became a gift (and in fact, Artoo and Threepio were essentially "wedding rings" that the pair exchanged on their wedding day).
I'm thinking it's going to be painful to lose "Snips" when Order 66 comes down.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.