• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek XI dishonors original by existing

Clearly DeSanto and Singer would do it better.

DeSanto and Singer were already doing it better, but they stopped because of 9/11. Or X-Men. Or Ron Moore. One of those.

BTW, ancient? You forgot Klingons. Who were always smooth-headed, and have always stayed that way. This new film would be like, putting bumps on their heads or something, and then never explaining it! Clearly something the old guard would never have done.
 
If they do have dirt on the Shuttle, they should stop the plot and have 3 scenes of in-depth explanation about how the shuttle's cleaning system is off-line. That's the only way the dirt can posssibly work, or be noticed by anyone!

I am protesting this irresponsible film-making Hollywood king by not posting here.

Now goodbye forever! Again!
huh, how many times are you going to say goodbye forever????:guffaw:
 
The shuttle dirt issue is bad, but the primitive controls are intolerable. TOS never used buttons or switches because it was REAL.

The next thing you know someone will decide to put wood panels all over the ship, or worse yet make the security station entirely out of wood. Thank god something like that never happened, it would've fallen flat on it's face.

BTW, ancient? You forgot Klingons. Who were always smooth-headed, and have always stayed that way. This new film would be like, putting bumps on their heads or something, and then never explaining it! Clearly something the old guard would never have done.

Exactly. The original creators had respect for canon. They'd never change the make-up to give the Klingons or Romulans some stupid foam forehead. If they had, Trek would've FAILED. Especially if they didn't spend at least a few episodes devoted to explaining it in great detail.

Trek did not have a single continuity problem when GR & Co. still ran things. Because they knew that any continuity problems would make Trek DIE.

To protest Abrams's possible continuity FLAWS I shall continue to not post here.

Goodbye forever!
 
Sir, when I say a shall leave and never come back, I am not making an empty threat! I will not feel the urge to continue bitching, I shall send a clear message to Abrams by refusing to post here.

Goodbye! Forever!
 
Carn-sarn-it, Jim! I just an old hillbilly doctor.
Was that the one with Walter Brennan? :lol:
Yup...though I must have grown up seeing repeats as it appears to have gone off the air before I turned 1 year old. :)

To correct myself, and be more accurate, it should actually be, "Carn-sarn-it, Jim-Bob! I'm just an old hillbilly doctor."

And there'd be a still on the Enterprise. Keeping the still in working order and not having it blow up would be as important to Scotty as keeping his warp engine core from breeching.

Kirk: Scotty, we need more 'shine in ten minutes or we're all sober.
Scotty: I'm distilling as fast as I can, captain. You can only coax so much liquor from these stills! She's at one quart per hour now.
Kirk: Then I need two quarts per hour!
Scotty: But she'll blow up.
Spock: Mr. Scott, try adding more copper tubing and burn a cleaner flame.
Scotty: Aye, Mr. Spock. That may just work.
Spock: Jim-Bob, I suggest we add soda water to our existing stock of moonshine. It'll stretch it out until Mr. Scott can deliver more.
Kirk: That may just buy us some time.
 
I want to see a new series in which Captain Geordi and his hilarious sidekick and retarded foster brother B4, run the ship. It will be kind of like "The Love Boat" meets TNG. White uniforms. Shorts and tall socks. And then anyone and everyone can guest star on it. Even Shatner. Especially Shatner, he could be a recurring guest star.
 
Abrams must think he's pretty damn clever making another Trek movie. He claims that it will 'honor' the original Trek. I cry foul on this. If he really wanted to honor Trek he would do it by NOT making another Trek movie. This is clearly what most of the fans want.

Umm... no it isn't. The fans don't want star trek to wither away and die. They want more.

Without Shatner's immense ego and Gene's vision of a sexy, godless, beige, pajama-wearing, four-breasted, no bad emotions, no-conflict, no-zippers, no-buttons, no-dirt, rainbow-warp-drive, manskirt future, there IS NO TREK.

Guess you've been asleep since 1987 and TNG,DS9,Voyager and Enterprise.

-Rather than ripping off Trek and leeching off of Trek's immense popularity, Abrams should...oh wait.

Rather than attempting to pull Trek out of the gutter it died in...hmmm

Rather than attempting to make a newer, 'better Trek' he should make an older, samer Trek...

If cheesy effects,fake looking aliens and a hammy,over the top captain is your cup of tea then watch your DVDs.

Ok, the main point is, the new cadet Uniforms look nothing like something a background extra from a 1960's TV show probably would have looked. When I see those uniforms I think: "My god, he's making Trek, but it's different! WTF?"

Again, where were you when TNG was made? You were probably one of those people who said "A bald captain? A klingon on the bridge? A woman docotr? Star Trek is dead!"

Even though we never actually saw cadet uniforms in Star Trek, I think we can agree that the original Trek would've done them BETTER.

:guffaw::guffaw::guffaw:

Oh boy. That was a good one. The original show had a budget that was barely above a good radio show. The aliens were fake as hell even by 1960s standards and the uniforms were.. shall we say, interesting.

That's like totally redesigning the Enterprise with a totally new hull proportion, blue grills on the nacelles, huge battleship torpedo launchers attached to the neck, and a big glowing light where the dish used to be, and trying to pass it off for the same ship!

The original creators would never have done anything as stupid as that, because if they had, the fans would've rejected it and Trek would've died instantly.

Let's face it, the swirling nacelle caps ARE TREK.

And this new cast. This Chris Pine character doesn't look like Shat. This recast is a bad idea. If they're going to have someone else try to fill the SHAT's shoes, they may's well just throw a black curly wig on Shat and have Scotty grow a 'stash. The original creators never would've allowed something like that, because they had this little thing called consistancy.

And if there's one thing Trek needs after 40+ years it's for everything to remain looking exactly the same.

Am I right or what?

No you're not. Again, you have the original 79 episodes on DVD. Nothing that is done in the future will change that. But you are way off the mark by saying that the original creators wouldn't change a thing. TNG was done by rodenberry himself with the express purpose of being different from the original show.You can't be stuck in the 1960s. Thank goodness their moving forward and giving Star Trek a kick in the pants.:techman:
 
I suggest we show our disgust at hollywood having an interest in the dried dead bones of star trek by raping and pillaging the paramount studios. And than we force them to put every TOS actor in the story line. Because god know that the worst way to get people into trek is to give them trek.

I'll bring the pitchforks, I think anienct is bringing the boiling oil and the torches. Hopefully someone brings along a video camera so we can post our exploits on Youtube.
 
Abrams thinks he can change Trek's style and get away with it. :rolleyes: As we all know, the Original Creators (tm) never did that. Trek was TIMELESS. In the 60's they had TIMELESS hippie stoner aliens and bright skimpy outfits. In TMP they had TIMELESS pastel colors and huge porn'stashes. In TNG they had TIMELESS beige carpet and faux wood.

As these examples show, Trek was never a product of its time and neigther should Abrams's Trek. The Original Creators did everything in EXACTLY the same style for 30 years because they respected us.

IT WAS TIMELESS, TREK SHOULD NOT HAVE ANY STYLE IT IS NOT CANON.

[long, elaborate post that takes this all seriously]


And the "Not Getting It" award for today goes to... :lol:

I don't post here often, so excuse me for taking the words of the Op at face value.;)

No problem, as I said, there is apparently no such thing as "over the top" when it comes to internet fanboy rants.

I'm leaving forever in protest now, Farwell!
 
Nah, I quite nuBSG near the end of season 2. I suppose I'll pick up the DVDs eventually. The whole Roslyn-miracle-recovery thing was too much for me to take.

If you didn't like that, you definitely won't like the Starbuck-miracle-recovery thing.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top