I think people are being surprisingly down on Star Trek as a vector for morality. I'm not saying it's like The Bible but then The Bible has it's own problems. For one you have to believe all that crap is real to get anything but the most simplistic message out of it.
Thanks, Bish. At a young age, with no real positive adult role models, TOS gave me a direction, not a moral destination; the questioning was what mattered to me. Seeking the answers to moral dillemas was more sustantive than Batman defeating the Joker, or Dr. Smith almost getting the Jupiter 2 destroyed.
Was Kirk really helping Tyree in arming his people?
Was Gill ignoring the authoritarian seduction of absolute power with the use of Nazi efficiency, even though he was an historian?
Was sparing the Gorn commander's life the right thing to do?
Was possibly losing his command of the Enterprise worth Spock's life during the onset of Pon-Farr?
Similar morality plays were in motion in The Outer Limits, The Twilight Zone & others, yet no SF series had characters so identifiable, so much like
family to me, hence not so resonant to my psyche.
Star Trek on the other hand is just a bunch of fun stories that occasional have a pretty decent message. Like the original poster I'm certainly not the type to relate every event and decision to Star Trek (or even any) but I doubt any of us have watched and enjoyed as much of it as we have without picking up some lessons from it, especially those of us who watched it as children.
That's the key thing in my querie; if you haven't grown up with Trek from a young age, this thread is kinda pointless.
People around here often seem a bit embarrased to admit that the show they love actually has some substance to it. It's an odd attitude.
