Yeah, sure, that's what she meant...Emotionally speaking.

Yeah, sure, that's what she meant...Emotionally speaking.
I think it underlines how little understood computers were in the day. Mind you, one can wonder if this was but one way the computer system was trying to alert the crew something was amiss. We can assume Finney knew enough to bypass measures to prevent tampering and prevent alarms sounding that someone was tampering with the system.A little odd that falsifying one record should result in the computer's inability to play chess. But there's a lot of good in the episode too.
I like that! I'm not sure we've seen the Enterprise computer ever do anything similar but it has been shown capable of creative extrapolations so why not?Mind you, one can wonder if this was but one way the computer system was trying to alert the crew something was amiss.
I like that! I'm not sure we've seen the Enterprise computer ever do anything similar but it has been shown capable of creative extrapolations so why not?
Kind of like Dobby the House Elf trying to warn Harry Potter through a technicality...
Otherwise, we are left with "computer expert" Finney bulk deleting a bunch of unrelated files before reinserting an adjusted file of security camera footage and ignoring the rest of the deleted files.
Exactly the instance I was thinking of!Given that the Enterprise computer has extrapolated some complex problems and came up with solutions (like "are we in another universe", etc) .
I agree it would make sense - but then it would make short work of other episodes such as Enemy Within or Conscience Of The King when the crew could just check the logs to see where EvilKirk is, or who poisoned O'Reilly.The episode establishes a visual record is being kept of ship's operations--particularly valuable during emergency situations. From this we should be able assume that if a vital area like the bridge is being recorded than other vital areas are also being recorded. Areas like engineering and, of course, the ion pod.
Which is similar to my "clumsy Finney" theory but given his state of mind perhaps that's not so hard to believe.Still, I suspect that just one missing or altered data file (say some table of the relative value of a piece under certain conditions) could cause the program to miscalculate fatally, and this is what Spock detected.
It may have been that long!After all our multiple viewings, it'd probably take three decades for most of us to do the same.
The thing with bothers me about this episode is why did the ion pod need to be manned?
With the TOS level of technology, any readouts and controls inside the pod could elsewhere on the ship, even if it is just an ajoining room. There is simply no reason to have a person to be in the ejectable pod.
"Court Martial" by Don M. Mankiewicz and Steven W. Carabatsos
Wow. I can't imagine how long it's been since I've seen this. I'd forgotten practically everything!
A good little story, setting the stage for courtroom stories throughout the various series.
Watching this week's SNW it crossed my mind that we can hardly go shopping without encountering security cameras. So many businesses and private homes have security cameras now, I'm surprised that there aren't cameras in literally every hallway and room of the ship with the possible exception of crew quarters and rest rooms, though I realize that would be a real plot wrecker.
I'm a little puzzled by the order of proceedings in the trial. Usually the prosecution goes first and lays out its case. The defense cross examines witnesses but doesn't present its own case until the prosecution rests. The trial starts with the prosecution's case as Shaw questions Spock and McCoy and Cogley declines to cross examine either.
Then we get Cogley calling Kirk to the stand. Huh??? Has the prosecution rested? Nope. After that, Shaw is still presenting her case by showing the video of Kirk pressing the eject button. After that, the prosecution rests. How was Cogley questioning Kirk in the middle of the prosecution's case?
There have been many discussions on this very subject over the years on this board! Here's a bit of info of what the "ion pod" have have been envisioned as:The thing with bothers me about this episode is why did the ion pod need to be manned?
With the TOS level of technology, any readouts and controls inside the pod could elsewhere on the ship, even if it is just an ajoining room. There is simply no reason to have a person to be in the ejectable pod.
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/what-is-an-ion-pod.114036/page-2For what it's worth, there is slightly more exposition in the old novelization for "Court Martial" by James Blish in the book Star Trek 2. Blish worked from slightly earlier versions of the scripts, so his adaptations sometimes have some content that differs a bit from the final episode. In this case, there's a tiny bit more explanation about ion pods--although I don't know if it was from an earlier version of the script or if it was just Blish's fertile imagination:
"The pod is outside the ship, attached to the skin. One of our missions is to get radiation readings in abnormal conditions, including ion storms. This can only be done by direct exposure of the necessary instruments in a plastic pod. However, in a major storm, the pod rapidly picks up a charge of its own that becomes a danger to the rest of the ship, and we have to get rid of it."
It's them taking the 'electronic brain' idea to the extreme in that the logic here is that if you mess with one part of the brain, it has unintended effects on other parts of the brain. And yes it was obvious that while they knew that humans programmed computers, no the writers didn't really know the way modern computers worked; but also to be fair this was a computer 300 years in the future, so who knows what they had to do to get the artificial intelligence to the point that they did in the 23rd century.I think it underlines how little understood computers were in the day. Mind you, one can wonder if this was but one way the computer system was trying to alert the crew something was amiss. We can assume Finney knew enough to bypass measures to prevent tampering and prevent alarms sounding that someone was tampering with the system.
Like Star Wars!All this talk of computers and chess has me reminiscing about a chess program I had for my Amiga 2000 in the 90s, called "Battle Chess." All the pieces were animated (8 bit) characters. When you made a move, your piece marched to the position. When you took the opponent's piece, the characters had a short, bloody fight with their medieval weapons. I got so I didn't even care if I played well, I just played for maximum carnage.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.