Just find an author or series you like and run with it!
Can anyone explain how Children of Kings isn't exactly in the standard timeline?
Can anyone explain how Children of Kings isn't exactly in the standard timeline?
Only that the author mentions he was heavily influenced by Bruce Greenwood's Pike rather than Jeffrey Hunter's. Ah, and what Christopher said above.
The main plot of Children of Kings builds on a tidbit about Orions from Diane Duane's classic Spock's World.
As far as I'm concerned, the book fits with canon as well as Star Trek: Enterprise, STXI (which featured Klingons with cloaks in 2258, and even earlier in the deleted scenes - and this after ENT retconned cloaks into the 2150's) or even something like Wrath of Khan does when put next to TOS. It's Pike-era TOS Trek, but it's not written as a 1964 period piece. Crew ranks and positions change in other Treks (see: Sulu, Geordi, Worf, Treklit Dax etc), so I'd hardly call that proof of the book happening in an alternate timeline, either.
It's about how much you sweat tiny details.
Can anyone explain how Children of Kings isn't exactly in the standard timeline?
Only that the author mentions he was heavily influenced by Bruce Greenwood's Pike rather than Jeffrey Hunter's. Ah, and what Christopher said above.
Actually, doesn't Dave say that he intended it as a prequel to the new film, but his Pike came out more Jeffrey Hunter than Bruce Greenwood?
I read the first two Titan books, to meet Riker's crew, before reading Destiny.
Can anyone explain how Children of Kings isn't exactly in the standard timeline?
Well, to quote myself from the original review thread:
There are a number of clear differences from canon here. Garison is a lieutenant instead of a chief petty officer, Pitcairn is chief engineer instead of transporter chief, the Klingons already have a prototype cloak in the 2250s, and there's even a reference to the Ferengi. Plus it's evidently before "The Cage" yet Colt is already Pike's yeoman, rather than the replacement for the one he lost on Rigel VII immediately before "The Cage." I was confused at first, until I read the author's note at the end, where Stern says that the new film continuity "freed [him] of the need to write specifically to one vision of humanity's future" and that the book shows "the Enterprise as it might have been under Captain Christopher Pike." He calls it a "prequel" to the movie, though it can't be, since the movie showed the Enterprise's maiden voyage. So it's not quite in the Prime universe and it's not quite in the Abramsverse. It's apparently sort of a stealth Myriad Universes tale, an alternate take on Pike's captaincy and on the astropolitical situation of the 2250s.
It's an interesting approach. I'd imagine it's a product of the period when the editors weren't sure how to deal with the new continuity and were developing projects adaptable to either timeline, or at least not specifically bound to either one.
I love trek fic and want to read sto. but i would like to do it from pike to kirk in the right order from the first five year mission to star trek 6 then onto the lost era and stargazer series. I know it'll take forever to do this but it is something I have been thing of for a long time . and what about robert april books other than the final frontier are there any ?
Greg Cox wrote a short story starring April for some anthology (whose name eludes me) of Enterprise captain stories.
Greg Cox wrote a short story starring April for some anthology (whose name eludes me) of Enterprise captain stories.
Though Hell should bar the Way in Enterprise Logs
^Did ya' cram in two dozen naval references for the authentic Diane Carey experience?![]()
Well, scratch "Children of Kings" off my list...
Well, scratch "Children of Kings" off my list...
It`s in a really odd sort of mish-mash continuity.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.