• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek the Animated Series?

Gil T.Azell

Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
How many episodes were there?
I see Space in Canada is doing a Marathon this Sunday (Dec 20, 2015)

I may have to set up the PVR.
Thanks in Advance.
 
Reviewed:
http://www.avclub.com/tvclub/star-trek-star-trek-the-animated-series-39584

while the animated show doesn't quite live up to the live action version, it's a worthy addendum to the franchise. Given the presence of most of the original cast, and the surprising amount of continuity with TOS, this is Trek for fans in the best possible sense: it takes a devotee to get past the roughness, but once you accept that this is never going to be perfect, it's a charming, intelligent reward for everyone who ever wondered just what the hell was going on inside the planet of "Shore Leave," or what Kirk's middle name really was, or what would happen if Kirk and Spock became fish-men.
...
What you get out of this series depends on your willingness to put up with these flaws. I'd imagined I wouldn't be able to tolerate them, but while it took me a few episodes to warm to it, I ended as a fan of this version of Star Trek. At its best, it's good writing overcoming shoddy presentation, and at its worst, it's a mediocre children's cartoon. But even then, it's a mediocre children's cartoon with Leonard Nimoy. If that means something to you(and it should), you could do worse.
 
I really liked this show. I don't know why Roddenberry tried to excise it from canon. Its 22 episodes were better than Season 3.
 
Roddenberry's lawyer excised it from canon when TNG was in production.

I still consider it to be an extension of the live-action series.

Kor
 
It's as much a part of the beautiful Star Trek tapestry as anything else. The efforts they made not to step on the toes of the live-action version, and instead to try and accurately continue the legacy, are very much appreciated.

Some animated adaptations of live-action TV shows in that period were terrible, by not remaining true to the spirit of their live-action forebears. TAS, on the other hand, is almost particular about trying to replicate TOS and its universe, without changing anything or ''kiddifying'' the concept. The stories may have been cut in half, but they 'feel' like leftovers from the 1966-1969 Star Trek, even though they were newly written. I pay tribute to everyone involved for deciding to keep that flame alive. :techman:
 
The writing is great, but the pacing is just sooo slow. You can tell the actors were either mailing it in or recording in different rooms too. I get bored with it a lot. Lots of production errors too.
 
For what budget Filmation had to work with, I always thought they did great stuff. Re-using clips, music, etc. out of necessity but for me anyway, it was great.

Flash Gordon TAS was their crowning glory, imo. Done just like the old serials and well-acted, produced, drawn, etc.

There is a great short documentary on youtube about their work and start. Talks some about TAS as well.
 
It's as much a part of the beautiful Star Trek tapestry as anything else. The efforts they made not to step on the toes of the live-action version, and instead to try and accurately continue the legacy, are very much appreciated.

Agreed. Before TAS premiered, fans were understandably worried about the quality and if anything could fill TOS' shoes, but the fears would melt away, as the intent to be a natural continuation of TOS was clear from the talents behind the production.

The following is how Filmation approached TAS, as related on pages 96 & 98 of the book, Lou Scheimer: Creating the Filmation Generation:

Lou Scheimer (2012): "The network had absolutely zero creative control for Star Trek; they had to accept the show or not accept the show, and I believe that was the first and last time that happened in the history of Saturday morning animation."

Norm Prescott (1973): "This is the first attempt to do an adult show in animation. Never before has an adult audience been challenged to watch a Saturday morning show. We feel it is a bold experiment."

Lou Scheimer (2012): "Wherever she (Dorothy Fontana) went, she begged the fans not to hate the show because it was animated, or it might kill the chances of Star Trek ever becoming another TV show or a movie. And once the fans heard how faithful we were being and how much care we were taking to respect the intent of the original series, they soon came over to our side. Word began buzzing to the 3,000 or so Star Trek fan clubs that Star Trek was coming back!"
Some animated adaptations of live-action TV shows in that period were terrible, by not remaining true to the spirit of their live-action forebears

Very true. From Hanna-Barbera's idiotic Partridge Family 2200, A.D., Jeannie, Addams Family, to Filmation's The New Adventures of Gilligan, My Favorite Martians, and The Brady Kids, each was a cheap cash-in with none of the heart or inspiration of the source.

TAS, on the other hand, is almost particular about trying to replicate TOS and its universe, without changing anything or ''kiddifying'' the concept. The stories may have been cut in half, but they 'feel' like leftovers from the 1966-1969 Star Trek, even though they were newly written. I pay tribute to everyone involved for deciding to keep that flame alive. :techman:

It certainly proved that ST was alive and well with a fanbase hungry for more quality ST, not content to live from reruns alone.
 
Kail Tescar's TAS site has a good interview with David Gerrold.

I always found this part interesting:

TAS: I've read that your two TAS stories were originally pitched for the third season of the original series. What was cut from them to make them fit the half hour format? Did it hurt the stories?

Gerrold: Surprisingly, nothing was cut. In fact, the animated scripts were almost as long as the live action scripts -- but as animation they played faster. That gave us the opportunity to do the stories in depth.

I don't think that could have been the case with more slower-paced episodes of TAS, though.

Kor
 
Star Trek: The Animated Series was my first introduction to Star Trek. Our local station, in Dayton, Ohio, was concurrently running syndicated episodes of TOS. For me, there was no difference between the two series. To this day, they are my favorite ST series.
 
Roddenberry's lawyer excised it from canon when TNG was in production.

I still consider it to be an extension of the live-action series.

Kor

This is interesting. Do you have any more background on this?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top