Insightful input to my commentary right there.
They didn't, IMO (and btw, opinions are just that. You can't just blanket-deny them as true with condescending two-word sentences because you disagree).
Not even close. And what they did do was completely secondary to the theme of the week. It should have been totally, 100% the focus of the story and, actually, it was dealt with almost as quickly as it was raised. A tokenistic "did I do the right thing?" at the end is not depth.
That's precisely why I made the point. What people tend to remember is the campy black-and-white/Casablanca-in-space aesthetic and the gimmick surrounding it, and actually it felt obvious to me that that was the part the writers were most interested in too, rather than the dramatic thread that should have been carrying the episode.
The bigger issue, though, is that even if you stripped away the gimmick entirely and shot the episode exactly as written, the underlying dilemma still wasn't enough. It was half-baked, underexplored, and ultimately didn't have much new or interesting to say.
Too often with this show, the gimmick or "theme of the week" ends up obscuring the story's golden thread instead of enhancing it. The central moral dilemma never gets the attention it needs to breathe, develop, and really land with the audience.
IMO, which is perfectly valid, by the way. You don't have to agree with it, but dismissing it with a two-word reply isn't exactly respectful. It just comes across as pompous.