Small correction - I think that's the D5 Tanker.^ Thanks for sharing!i have not seen the ship’s underside until now.
Captain Revo posted preview pictures of the D6 Tanker on Twitter: https://twitter.com/captain_revo/status/1484575171428106241?s=21

Small correction - I think that's the D5 Tanker.^ Thanks for sharing!i have not seen the ship’s underside until now.
Captain Revo posted preview pictures of the D6 Tanker on Twitter: https://twitter.com/captain_revo/status/1484575171428106241?s=21

Maybe they used the geometry of the updated model that Fabio Passaro built for the Eaglemoss magazine?
Ben basically confirmed that they did.Maybe they used the geometry of the updated model that Fabio Passaro built for the Eaglemoss magazine?
I might have called that a minelayer^ Thanks for sharing!i have not seen the ship’s underside until now.
Captain Revo posted preview pictures of the D5 Tanker on Twitter: https://twitter.com/captain_revo/status/1484575171428106241?s=21
(edited to correct D6 > D5)

Worth recalling they originally pitched it a couple of years ago, but everyone immediately looked at their model and pointed out a bunch of issues. They quietly withdrew it and did more development.Why would anyone sign up for this 'build the D model'? I am genuinely curious because the promo images show a lot of these issues. There are huge panel gaps on the nacelles, the nacelles are misaligned, much of the detailing is wrong or missing. Now, we expect that to some extent with the starships collection - but we are shelling out a lot less money.
I'll never understand why people buy Trek socks, or these insanely ugly funko pop things that are all just variations of the same minimalistic cheap baby toy design.Why would anyone sign up for this 'build the D model'? I am genuinely curious because the promo images show a lot of these issues. There are huge panel gaps on the nacelles, the nacelles are misaligned, much of the detailing is wrong or missing. Now, we expect that to some extent with the starships collection - but we are shelling out a lot less money.
For example, Eaglemoss have screwed the pooch with every Enterprise model - except the NX01.
Ent-D, terrible window misalignment aside, the shuttle bays are wrong and there are huge panel gaps.
Ent-A, the whole model is crap. The saucer rim is all kinds of wrong, you can see the pegs through the deflector, which is terrible. The bridge module is incorrect - the list goes on and on.
I collect some of the models because they are pre-made and look quite nice on a shelf - but no way would I trust Eadlemoss to build a high-end replica, at least without first seeing a decent completed build.
I'm slowly building the 1:350 Enterprise kit (movie version) and I tell you, it will be a work of art when it's done. There are pro-builders out there selling this kit complete for around 2k and you'd be better off buying an Enterprise from them, rather than this Eaglemoss junk.
We need a ministry of spaceship model building TSNIITOY. I will be the Chief Designer and will begin with the mass executions of toy executives.Why can't we have more Japanese Makers manufacturing smaller Diecast Star Trek models.
I'd gladly pay them if they get their QC done correctly and make quality models.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.