The phaser hard points (stolen right from the TMP era), the hull texturing, and the nacelles (round bussard collectors similar to TOS) all looks more primitive than the late 24th century.There is nothing about ships like the Buran and the Edison that look so primitive that they could not have been used as FC ships.
one of the best (if not the very best) models they've done. along with the XL NX-01 and refit NX-01.No complaints with the NX-01. Sharp model.
one of the best (if not the very best) models they've done. along with the XL NX-01 and refit NX-01.
^ and the deflector dish still isn't a separate piece like it is on other pre-built models
Discovery E? Have I missed something?Yep. Though for its size, I think it is a great model. Have it and the Double-E sitting on my desk.
Just waiting for my Discovery E now. Ordered it before the two I got from Amazon, yet it just shipped today. 7-10 days, I think they shipped it Pony Express.
Discovery E? Have I missed something?
Even the Akira?The FC ships minus the Enterprise-E were designed by Alex Jaeger. I'm not too fond of his designs either.
The phaser hard points (stolen right from the TMP era), the hull texturing, and the nacelles (round bussard collectors similar to TOS) all looks more primitive than the late 24th century.
Even the Akira?
I see structural similarities even if you refuse to.
It's not really a case of refusing too see it, it's just a case of differing opinions. I also don't think the Disco designs would fit in to a later time period as they are.
Except just about every VOY-FC era ship featured compound curves to evoke a fusion of technology and organic forms. Everything in DSC is hard and angular and always a little out of proportion. The hard angles emphasize the ships are purely mechanical (and therefore conveying "less advanced than TNG-era" ships) while the proportions make them less elegant (and thus suggesting less advanced) than TMP era ships with their fine proportions and "unnaturally" thin structures.
John Eaves knows the art of design and he knows the design history of Star Trek. The DSC ships are all very deliberate in their shaping and detail to fit in the assigned era. Round vs boxy nacelles are probably the least important design feature.
i can understand how the evolution of nacelles toward the more rectilinear forms in the 24th century is echoed by the nacelles in the discovery era. but for me that's where the similarities end.Just because one detail looks kinda similar doesn't mean the whole is interchangeable.
i think that assumes an organic evolution from cylindrical to rectangular, which we'd all prefer to see. but realistically, technology takes a lot of different forms over the years. automobiles didn't evolve fluidly like animals. i guess the same goes for warp nacelles.Surely Disco nacelles are a mid-point between Phoenix/NX-01/Connie cylinders and the TMP rectangular/art deco ones?
They seem to fit quite well to me.
I saw a fan mod of the Shenzhou where all they did was replace the nacelles with cylindrical ones and alter some of the hull detailing. I don't think it looks "cheesy" at all and looks like it would fit in both ENT or TOS.
![]()
Just because one detail looks kinda similar doesn't mean the whole is interchangeable.
Most of the ships from the pilot have hard edges, a fair bit of greebling, and proportion that are a little weird. Then you get to Discovery, which has extremely fine proportions, a mostly smooth surface, but still a lot of hard angles. Discoprise, with NX-01 details, is visibly less refined than NCC-1030, though more simplified than Shenzhou.
i can understand how the evolution of nacelles toward the more rectilinear forms in the 24th century is echoed by the nacelles in the discovery era. but for me that's where the similarities end.
that said, my mind still always groups the binary stars fleet with the first contact fleet too.
i think it has less to do with the ships looking like they belong alongside one another and more to do with how they've been presented to us. in both cases, we're given a handful of new federation ships that have distinct silhouettes and play with the traditional federation starship arrangement in different ways. both of those fleets were designed to feature distinct ships that were still recognizably star trek. the same thought process that brought us the steamrunner-class with the nacelles bridging the primary and secondary hulls in such a unique way is what also brought us the hoover-class with the nacelles literally built into the primary hull. the designers broke down the enterprise's three main components (primary hull, secondary hull, and engines) and remixed them to create new ships that were different enough from the enterprise and from each other to be recognized at a distance and intermingling with one another in frenetic battle sequences.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.