Surprised no one's mentioned Michael's stuffed "animal" yet, in terms of the continuity.
It does seem weird that she wouldn't know what a tardigrade was right away if she had a stuffed one as a kid, doesn't it?
Surprised no one's mentioned Michael's stuffed "animal" yet, in terms of the continuity.
I have, others have, but it's no big deal (like the sickbay window in Ephraim)Surprised no one's mentioned Michael's stuffed "animal" yet, in terms of the continuity.
Surprised no one's mentioned Michael's stuffed "animal" yet, in terms of the continuity.
Just imagine if Star Wars had gone ahead and done a spin-off series about Jedi Younglings featured in an episode of Clone Wars. And entire series devoted to a cast we knew would be slaughtered by a man they likely idolized in a few years.I liked this short a lot, but it's just so jarring with the rest of Trek that it connects to. It seems like a kid-friendly animation and you would assume the sequels would be kid-friendly as well, and then you remember that Mike Burnham ends up brutally killed by Klingons not too long after this short...
Oh, that so totally has me triggered. I'm so triggered, I might as well be considered a gun. Such blatant and flagrant disregard for continuity, canon and human decency has my blood boiling right now it's unbelievable.Surprised no one's mentioned Michael's stuffed "animal" yet, in terms of the continuity.
The Clone Wars has it's own little ecosystem that kids can spend days and days watching and thinking about without touching "Revenge of the Sith", due to the sheer number of animated episodes. Star Trek doesn't really have that, unless you count the Animated Series (which I suppose counts...) Although TOS is pretty kid friendly too.Just imagine if Star Wars had gone ahead and done a spin-off series about Jedi Younglings featured in an episode of Clone Wars. And entire series devoted to a cast we knew would be slaughtered by a man they likely idolized in a few years.
Oh, that so totally has me triggered. I'm so triggered, I might as well be considered a gun. Such blatant and flagrant disregard for continuity, canon and human decency has my blood boiling right now it's unbelievable.![]()
![]()
![]()
We're assuming that the writers meant for this stuffed animal to simply be a random wild tardigrade, though (out of all the possible billions of known species in the universe by that point in time that a stuffed toy could've been produced in likeness of)? It was clearly an anachronistic nod/reference to the spore-drive from later on in DSC.
They were working on time travel tech. Did Mike Burnham actually travel back in time to ancient Africa and witness the story he told firsthand?? :OBurnham's parents were super-scientists working on top secret stuff no one knew about even thirty years later. They probably learned about mycelial-based tardigrades and experimented on them and fabricated the stuffed animal for their precocious daughter because they were so enamored by the physiology of it all.
Although, after watching "Ephraim and DOT" my daughter wants a plush Ephraim.You can buy plush tardigrades on Amazon right now. They're based on the microbe, not the fictional space creature.
A quick google search for 'plush tardigrade' actually comes out with results. Here's one: https://www.amazon.com/Creature-Tar...ocphy=9032538&hvtargid=pla-457752965921&psc=1Although, after watching "Ephraim and DOT" my daughter wants a plush Ephraim.
There's still time to get it by Christmas!Although, after watching "Ephraim and DOT" my daughter wants a plush Ephraim.
A quick google search for 'plush tardigrade' actually comes out with results. Here's one: https://www.amazon.com/Creature-Tar...ocphy=9032538&hvtargid=pla-457752965921&psc=1
lolHOLY CRAP!!!
NOBODY MENTION THIS TO ABDIN !!!
![]()
https://www.amazon.com/GIANT-MICROB...XYYV0XPEZW1&psc=1&refRID=2PJG8E9Q5XYYV0XPEZW1
No, not really. I would imagine seeing a human size one is a bit different than the tiny ones she might have read about.It does seem weird that she wouldn't know what a tardigrade was right away if she had a stuffed one as a kid, doesn't it?
The animation was kinda bad in parts. I mean, some of it was beautifully composed. But IMHO they went for the wrong balance between realistic and cartoony for the faces of the characters. Little Micheal was okay, but her dad and the village elder just were uncanny valley, with their lips not moving like real humans when they were speaking
Or it was just a nice little one-off cartoon to be appreciated as such (much like the second one) and trying to make “canon” connections misses the entire point.
It does seem weird that she wouldn't know what a tardigrade was right away if she had a stuffed one as a kid, doesn't it?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.