That’s not a battle star, that’s an Andorian battle cruiser.
Kumari class or similar.
Kumari class or similar.
2Only one week to DS9 now, right?![]()
Saw this pointed out on Reddit
"The comment about the Carlsbad + bold Boimler + tendi not doing her training with migleemo makes me wonder if this Ep was originally meant to be Ep 3"
Interesting theory.
Loved Shax and T'Ana's holodeck program!
Back in TNG's "Descent" it took two senior officers to remove the safeties. One would think that would get logged and sent up the chain of command, but perhaps Starfleet simply assumes officers can exhibit self control, like the lack of security on the comm system in "Neutral Zone."Very random comment here, but is it logged somewhere when someone disables the holodeck safeties? You'd think it would be given the inherant risks, but then again I suppose that report is most likely to go to Shax anyway but...
I do remember a Voyager episode where Torres was indulging in increasingly dangerous activities, I can't recall if the computer flagged this though.
isn’t it odd for two aliens to run a human program, though? Of course it’s something Voyager would totally do…Firstly, I never even began to imagine how thrilled I would be at T'Ana and Shaxs having a romantic bank heist time together in their black-and-white simulation.![]()
you expect Starfleet to take security seriously?Very random comment here, but is it logged somewhere when someone disables the holodeck safeties? You'd think it would be given the inherant risks, but then again I suppose that report is most likely to go to Shax anyway but...
I think Tom just walked in on her with the securities off and b’elanna about to die.I do remember a Voyager episode where Torres was indulging in increasingly dangerous activities, I can't recall if the computer flagged this though
on the D you also needed two officers to activate the self-destruct device, on Voyager (and, interestingly, on the E) the captain could blow up the ship on her on.Back in TNG's "Descent" it took two senior officers to remove the safeties. One would think that would get logged and sent up the chain of command, but perhaps Starfleet simply assumes officers can exhibit self control, like the lack of security on the comm system in "Neutral Zone."
Well, they're supposed to be evolved humans who wouldn't blow stuff up without a very good reason.hinking of it, you needed *three* officers to blow up the 1701…perhaps the furthest into the future the less Starfleet cares? I mean, by 2399 a retired admiral can blow up someone else’s ship!
I like the idea of two aliens finding a human program about bank robberies "exotic," and "romantic."It may seem odd that they were using a human simulation, but maybe they had investigated the ship's database to find, uuhm, suitably 'romantic' programs.![]()
Holodeck safeties, like much else in Star Trek, are never consistently depicted. The thing in Descent about two senior officers needed was subsequently ignored. Often times, all was needed was one person, and they didn't even need to be a senior officer. Sometimes an authorization code is required, others the computer immediately complies with the request.Back in TNG's "Descent" it took two senior officers to remove the safeties. One would think that would get logged and sent up the chain of command, but perhaps Starfleet simply assumes officers can exhibit self control, like the lack of security on the comm system in "Neutral Zone."
Sort of. That is, because she injured herself at one point in the episode, Janeway looked into the holodeck and saw it was running without the safeties. Not sure if there is otherwise an alert that would get sent to security or whatever notifying "Lt Torres has disabled holodeck safeties, 15:25."I do remember a Voyager episode where Torres was indulging in increasingly dangerous activities, I can't recall if the computer flagged this though.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.