SNIP!
Again, this is not about "hindsight." Anti-racist activism has a very long history. There were, for instance, a hell of a lot of people protesting against Gone With the Wind and Song of the South in the 1940s for perpetuating racist stereotypes and tropes.[/QUOTE]
...Which is as it SHOULD be, and that's the point. Not OUR place to dictate what is based on OUR standards, but rather learn from the past, appreciate it for what it is, so that what was won't occur again. But the next question is this: if said depictions of racist stereotypes are harmful, such as Breakfast at Tiffany's, Genghis Khan, etc., should they be censored into oblivion? I say, nay, since I don't believe in censorship of any kind, save for what is age-appropriate (especially without context).
And, btw, if I am being argumentative about these things, my thing is about where Western culture in general should go, as far as where society should be vis-a-vis free speech. Some feel that "free speech" should be "regulated", while others believe that social pressure should be the deciding factor in these things. What say you?
Again, this is not about "hindsight." Anti-racist activism has a very long history. There were, for instance, a hell of a lot of people protesting against Gone With the Wind and Song of the South in the 1940s for perpetuating racist stereotypes and tropes.[/QUOTE]
...Which is as it SHOULD be, and that's the point. Not OUR place to dictate what is based on OUR standards, but rather learn from the past, appreciate it for what it is, so that what was won't occur again. But the next question is this: if said depictions of racist stereotypes are harmful, such as Breakfast at Tiffany's, Genghis Khan, etc., should they be censored into oblivion? I say, nay, since I don't believe in censorship of any kind, save for what is age-appropriate (especially without context).
And, btw, if I am being argumentative about these things, my thing is about where Western culture in general should go, as far as where society should be vis-a-vis free speech. Some feel that "free speech" should be "regulated", while others believe that social pressure should be the deciding factor in these things. What say you?