Star Trek is not, and never was, particularly progressive

Nope.

 

I need a Ouija board and a medium to follow this thread.

 

How about a reluctant stowaway instead of a medium?

 

Oh the pain! The pain of it all!

 

This thread has all the twists and turns of a Tilt-A-Wheel at a carnival and twice the dizziness.

 

Where are we in this now? I see a Lost In Space pic.

EDIT: Nevermind. I read the rest of the page, but that's all I'm doing.

As an ex-mod, especially an ex-GTD mod, I never comment on "How I would've done it!" Because I used to hate back-seat modding... But this time I'll make an exception. I'm pretty sure I would've closed this by now.

 

I could tell Martok was a white actor and that Michael Dorn is black.

 

In summary, Star Trek has the audacity to be about people?

 

It was a rhetorical question. I didn't really want to know.

But thanks anyway.

 

There's nothing but confusing blackness hovering over this thread, though.

 

Where's my fella Fil-Am Pilar Seurat when I need her?!

 

Save us, Brian Brophy!

 

Only the mighty Robau can save us.

 

The way they keep saying 'females' instead of 'women' rubs me the wrong way for some reason. Like how the Ferengi did.

Also the use of 'æ' is odd.

 

You know, Robau. A Cuban-American 23rd century starship Captain played by an actor of Pakistani ancestry.

 

Robau is so progressive... that his edge cuts others.

 

3:36

"Haven't you ever seen a man so broken that he had to SPIN?!?"