• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star trek into darkness test screenings question

PS. If someone that works in the filming business, log on and post saying that y'all are right and that I am wrong? Then y'all will be right and I will be wrong. But he or she have to prove that they works for a film company and not saying that they work for a film company and not having others saying that they knows him or her.

My Name is Legion wrote a couple of TNG episodes and seems to have some friends in the business. :techman:
 
Considering JJ's love of secrecy, test audiences are likely locked away in a large underground vault until the film's premiere.

Probably this for Abrams. In the Internet age, it would be hard to keep any one of 200 or so people at a screening from leaking something important and having it all over the world minutes after the movie ended. Might outweigh the benefits of the secrecy. Then again, he could be taking a chance. What if the test audience doesn't seem enthused, surprised, awed, or otherwise affecting by finding out Harrison is Khan?

If the studio wanted it screened, wouldn't Abrams have no choice? So, if Paramount didn't want it screened, they must be pretty satisfied that Abrams delivered what they wanted.

Also, does anyone know if Abrams had the last cut in ST09 or STID?
 
PS. If someone that works in the filming business, log on and post saying that y'all are right and that I am wrong? Then y'all will be right and I will be wrong.

No, that's not how such things are determined. Movies are test screened quite frequently.
 
In what year did he said that to you?

This would have been around 1982. He was the GoH at a college-run sf convention I was involved with.
You have good memory to remember of what someone had said that far back. That's 31 years.

Hey, how often do you get to meet the guy who directed TMP, The Andromeda Strain, The Haunting, The Day the Earth Stood Still, Curse of the Cat People, West Side Story, and The Sound of Music? Yeah, I remember it well.

As I recall, I also got him to autograph a copy of Starlog magazine for me . . . .
 
PS. If someone that works in the filming business, log on and post saying that y'all are right and that I am wrong? Then y'all will be right and I will be wrong.

No, that's not how such things are determined. Movies are test screened quite frequently.

GI Joe 2 is a good recent example - it was put back and re-edited after it tested poorly with audiences.

If you want to go a little further back, Titanic was subject to at least two screenings which were followed by sample groups and that data was vital in the marketing. See Paula Parisi about the subject.
 
He's not right "in a way." He's just right, flat-out. Saying that "theatrical movies don't go through test screenings" is wrong.
Only the first and fifth previews of a film is known as a screen testing. A film goes though 6 progresses which the first viewing is call a screening testing. But a preview screening, which is also call a public preview screening, this is a final screening testing.

PS. If someone that works in the filming business, log on and post saying that y'all are right and that I am wrong? Then y'all will be right and I will be wrong. But he or she have to prove that they works for a film company and not saying that they work for a film company and not having others saying that they knows him or her.
????????????????????????????
Only the first and fifth? Where are you from, the fizzbin universe?
:guffaw:

I was so stunned by that post I couldn't even react! 1st and 5th !!

"Yes, they have very rigid unbreakable rules in Hollywood about test screenings and it's ALWAYS the 1st and 5th!" :wtf:


Oh crap, I cannot prove i am a Hollywood insider, so i have no right to dispute that post. Sorry!
 
This would have been around 1982. He was the GoH at a college-run sf convention I was involved with.
You have good memory to remember of what someone had said that far back. That's 31 years.
A good memory might be a useful talent for a writer and editor.

Thanks, but it's more that it was a big deal for me at the time. Like I said, how often do you get to listen to Robert Wise talking about directing TMP? As I recall, he also complained that a big chunk of his budget had been spent before he even signed onto the project.
 
do any of you know if the press critic screening is the austrailian premeier or is it an entierly different screening?
 
PS. If someone that works in the filming business, log on and post saying that y'all are right and that I am wrong? Then y'all will be right and I will be wrong.

No, that's not how such things are determined. Movies are test screened quite frequently.
Yes your right. That would had been done months ago, before any trailers of the film was even release.

Anyway, Where did the op gets his information from? I've search the web for it and never found it.
I do know that 30 minutes of STID was shown in a few theaters and Imax theater in London back on March 8. And I also knows that it will be shown in Sydney, April 23.

This is probably is what y'all referring to.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_screening

Anyway I've got my information from the film testing, which is at the buttom.

do any of you know if the press critic screening is the austrailian premeier or is it an entierly different screening?
I don't know. But that only through invitation and yes it's a different screening, then the one that will be shown in Sydney on April 23.

http://www.imax.com/movies/m/star-trek-into-darkness-an-imax-3d-experience/

It call fan sneak, which will be held on May 15 at 8pm and 11pm at the Imax theaters listed at the bottom of the page.

Anyway you leave it here or give it own tread.

By the way, that many theaters that is listed? There would had been a test screening.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Considering JJ's love of secrecy, test audiences are likely locked away in a large underground vault until the film's premiere.

And he's had them on a diet of bread and water and random (but regular) electroshock therapy, right? ;)

Considering JJ's love of secrecy, test audiences are likely locked away in a large underground vault until the film's premiere.

Probably this for Abrams. In the Internet age, it would be hard to keep any one of 200 or so people at a screening from leaking something important and having it all over the world minutes after the movie ended. Might outweigh the benefits of the secrecy. Then again, he could be taking a chance. What if the test audience doesn't seem enthused, surprised, awed, or otherwise affecting by finding out Harrison is Khan?

If the studio wanted it screened, wouldn't Abrams have no choice? So, if Paramount didn't want it screened, they must be pretty satisfied that Abrams delivered what they wanted.

Also, does anyone know if Abrams had the last cut in ST09 or STID?

Really, if they were afraid of THAT kind of mega-spoilage, they should not be premiering the movie at different dates in different parts of the world.

Have it open everywhere ON THE SAME DATE. :vulcan:

You have good memory to remember of what someone had said that far back. That's 31 years.
A good memory might be a useful talent for a writer and editor.

Thanks, but it's more that it was a big deal for me at the time. Like I said, how often do you get to listen to Robert Wise talking about directing TMP? As I recall, he also complained that a big chunk of his budget had been spent before he even signed onto the project.

What else did he say? Anything else you might want to share with us, Greg? :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Considering JJ's love of secrecy, test audiences are likely locked away in a large underground vault until the film's premiere.

Probably this for Abrams. In the Internet age, it would be hard to keep any one of 200 or so people at a screening from leaking something important and having it all over the world minutes after the movie ended. Might outweigh the benefits of the secrecy. Then again, he could be taking a chance. What if the test audience doesn't seem enthused, surprised, awed, or otherwise affecting by finding out Harrison is Khan?

If the studio wanted it screened, wouldn't Abrams have no choice? So, if Paramount didn't want it screened, they must be pretty satisfied that Abrams delivered what they wanted.

Also, does anyone know if Abrams had the last cut in ST09 or STID?

Really, if they were afraid of THAT kind of mega-spoilage, they should not be premiering the movie at different dates in different parts of the world.

Have it open everywhere ON THE SAME DATE. :vulcan:

Well, those openings are only days apart, not weeks or even months before an opening so everyone gets spoiled before the big publicity and advertising buildup even begins. Plus of course, sooner or later, even Abrams has to let the cat out of the bag.

Though I have speculated on these boards before that some day, Abrams may make his own "Mystery Box" movie, that he shoots and then never shows to anyone. :)
 
Yes, I would love to hear more. I remember being totally pumped for TMP when it came out, but while I liked the movie, the early teenage me wasn't entirely blown away.
 
PS. If someone that works in the filming business, log on and post saying that y'all are right and that I am wrong? Then y'all will be right and I will be wrong.

No, that's not how such things are determined. Movies are test screened quite frequently.
Yes your right. That would had been done months ago, before any trailers of the film was even release.

Anyway, Where did the op gets his information from? I've search the web for it and never found it.
I do know that 30 minutes of STID was shown in a few theaters and Imax theater in London back on March 8. And I also knows that it will be shown in Sydney, April 23.

This is probably is what y'all referring to.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_screening

Anyway I've got my information from the film testing, which is at the buttom.

do any of you know if the press critic screening is the austrailian premeier or is it an entierly different screening?
I don't know. But that only through invitation and yes it's a different screening, then the one that will be shown in Sydney on April 23.

http://www.imax.com/movies/m/star-trek-into-darkness-an-imax-3d-experience/

It call fan sneak, which will be held on May 15 at 8pm and 11pm at the Imax theaters listed at the bottom of the page.

Anyway you leave it here or give it own tread.

By the way, that many theaters that is listed? There would had been a test screening.
yenny, please try not to post three times in a row in a given thread. If you've just posted and then think of something else you want to say, use the Edit button to add that to the post just made, rather than making a whole new post. If you wish to respond to three different posts by three different people, that's what the Multi-Quote button is for.

I will merge these three for you.
 
Probably this for Abrams. In the Internet age, it would be hard to keep any one of 200 or so people at a screening from leaking something important and having it all over the world minutes after the movie ended. Might outweigh the benefits of the secrecy. Then again, he could be taking a chance. What if the test audience doesn't seem enthused, surprised, awed, or otherwise affecting by finding out Harrison is Khan?

If the studio wanted it screened, wouldn't Abrams have no choice? So, if Paramount didn't want it screened, they must be pretty satisfied that Abrams delivered what they wanted.

Also, does anyone know if Abrams had the last cut in ST09 or STID?

Really, if they were afraid of THAT kind of mega-spoilage, they should not be premiering the movie at different dates in different parts of the world.

Have it open everywhere ON THE SAME DATE. :vulcan:

Well, those openings are only days apart, not weeks or even months before an opening so everyone gets spoiled before the big publicity and advertising buildup even begins. Plus of course, sooner or later, even Abrams has to let the cat out of the bag.

Though I have speculated on these boards before that some day, Abrams may make his own "Mystery Box" movie, that he shoots and then never shows to anyone. :)

DAYS?!?

it's releasing in London a WHOLE TWO WEEKS before it opens here in the US.

Two weeks that I'm supposed to keep my eyes and ears closed?

I call that idiotic.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top