I noticed that as well. It went to commercial around 5-to-9 here on SPACE and I was expecting it to return for the last bit of show, but the credits rolled instead and I was like whaaat?? Post-credits, Space didn't even run a string of commercials to fill the space till 9pm and instead just started the next show, which effed up their scheduling for the rest of the night, so the PVR missed the first few mins of AfterTrek later on.This might be the shortest episode in franchise history. 37 minutes.
I noticed that as well. It went to commercial around 5-to-9 here on SPACE and I was expecting it to return for the last bit of show, but the credits rolled instead and I was like whaaat?? Post-credits, Space didn't even run a string of commercials to fill the space till 9pm and instead just started the next show, which effed up their scheduling for the rest of the night, so the PVR missed the first few mins of AfterTrek later on.
Complete and utter agreement. But I would go a step further. I would say that, if Lorca hadn't been MU-native, that I saw nothing wrong with his portrayal at all. Perhaps a case of Acute Stress Disorder but not PTSD. Nor did I think he did anything that anyone else in his chain wouldn't've likely done as well. Even, controversially, the destruction of the Buran. I've seen situations were our folks have been forced to call down iron on a friendly position to take out the bad-guys. Fallujah was like that. It's rough and it hurts but it happens. Some people here act as if that's the Devil's work but, frankly, they have no idea how war is actually fought and what one has to do to accomplish your objectives. Hell, I recall, way back when Discovery began, that one of the chief complaints about Lorca was that he yelled at Staments. Are you serious? THAT makes him a "fascist warmonger"?! Because he yells at an insubordinate lieutenant--the officer equivalent of an E-2/E-3!--and hurts his feelings! I cannot count how many times I've seen that happen and much, much "worse," to boot.I'm not sure if the 'Lorca' model of Starfleet was a better one but his story had a different kind of track when he was simply damaged Lorca. The story itself was milking the concept of this flawed man, at least it did until the predictions of him being mirror Lorca became confirmed. Now everything is just this easy 'fix' - a cheat. Much like finding out Tyler was Voq. Again another easy fix and prediction. Any investment one had in the complexities of a prisoner/male abuse story or in Michael falling for him was exchanged for a 'gotcha' moment. Hey forget all that, he's Voq. Same with Stamets and Culber. Their love story culminated in Culber being murdered for the drama. Yet every death seems to be going the same way. Someone dies. Oh hang on, not really dead. Death and consequence of action means nothing.
Space: One of the frontiers. These are the voyages of the starship Discovery. Its continuing mission: to explore muliple universes & parralel possibiities, to seek out new realities and new civilizations, to boldly go where no one has gone before.
^^^
oh please, yes it SOUNDS good, which is why they had it (and took parts from three different distict versions to come up with the final version that was used). But if you're being honest - from 1966 on STAR TREK has RARELY actually done that in an episode. Yes, an episode often started out with:
"We're here to explore/star map, etc..." -- BUT, suddenly the REAL plot complication/situation appeared that would be the ACTUAL story focus of the episode. Star Trek at it's core was: "Horatio Honblower...IN SPACE!"
I see several posts mentioning that Lorca may not be back in S2. Why is that? If he does something to vindicate himself why wouldn't he stick around? Also right now only Burnham knows he is MU. Maybe she will keep quiet so as to save him, after all her actions cost her last captain to loose her life.
Yeah, but it wasn't DS9's mission either. They were at a crossroads, so while they did see new life and new civilizations, that life generally came to them. Their mission was prep Bajor for induction and hold down that corner of (future) Federation space.
That was never Star Trek's mission statement. It doesn't even qualify as the Enterprise's mission statement. It's just a nice monologue from the opening credits.Discovery needs to remember Star Trek's original mission statement:
"Space: the final frontier. These are the voyages of the starship Enterprise. Its five-year mission: to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no man has gone before".
A similar thing which was never addressed in Star Trek is with the advent of replicators, you would think a lot more humans would look at consuming the flesh of animals as being barbaric, since it would literally no longer be required. But aside from Chakotay, I don't think any humans are canonically vegetarians in the Trekverse.
I am so not happy right now.
Don't get me wrong, it's clever how the long con all ties together, from Tilly to Burnham and everyone else, but I fucking hate it. I loved Lorca, he was my favourite character by far. He was damaged, he was an asshole, but he was great. And now he is how he is because he's an evil mirror duplicate.
I'm pretty fucked up. I loved that fucked up, damaged people could prosper in this version of Trek's universe. I loved that there were shades of grey. I hate that the shades of grey I loved were only there because he was an evil mirror duplicate and only pure, virtuous and well adjusted people can be in the happy joyous Starfleet.
Fucking pissed off.
![]()
They have to solve the problem/moment that Lorca came in the orignal univers. Basicly they have to go back to their own univers before Lorca arrives an possible before the ship of Lorca was destroyd which will change the time line (for the better or the worse). Atleast Lorca will remain than a reliable captain and Burnman will not be in the situation she is in (with her current knoledge). As Aaron Harberts reveald after the first season their will be a positive feeling of hope.
Despite the grand guignol theatrical grittiness, this is not a show written successfully for grown-ups. Character motivations, and therefore the characters, remain pat and simplistic.I am so not happy right now.
Don't get me wrong, it's clever how the long con all ties together, from Tilly to Burnham and everyone else, but I fucking hate it. I loved Lorca, he was my favourite character by far. He was damaged, he was an asshole, but he was great. And now he is how he is because he's an evil mirror duplicate.
I'm pretty fucked up. I loved that fucked up, damaged people could prosper in this version of Trek's universe. I loved that there were shades of grey. I hate that the shades of grey I loved were only there because he was an evil mirror duplicate and only pure, virtuous and well adjusted people can be in the happy joyous Starfleet.
Fucking pissed off.
![]()
Yeah, I'm gonna base the shows "mission" on what actually appeared on the screen. Because those are actual facts not alt-facts. Your link merely traced the origins of the monologue and doesn't establish it as a mission statement for the ship or the show.Jesus Christ. Are you guys for real?
Next thing you're telling me is Star Trek has was never science fiction either?
This is the fucking mission statement. Of the ship. Of the show. This is not up for debate. Just because you might not like it, doesn't make it any less true. Cut your contrarian alt-fact bullshit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where_no_man_has_gone_before
Because, as others have pointed out, she really is not all that bright, when it all comes down to it. She makes a lot of mistakes that rookie wouldn't.Something people seem to be overlooking.
Why did Burnham bring an object along on an undercover mission that would immediately identify her as not being who she claimed?
Tell that to GoT!!!The secret to good serialization is to not have much figured out ahead of time. Overplotted shows can come out as messes because the writers don't have the freedom to take up what works and run with it.
Time travel is relative. Lets wait and see.I
If you mean you expect them to time travel to undo original events, I can't see them doing that at all. First of all, with "Magic to make..." the writers established they are going to be pretty strict about not just throwing in time travel or letting it do everything. Second, I think these writers, for whatever other flaws they have, will not make the mistake of erasing everything that has happened up till this point for the sake of an "easy" redemption/fix. That is the same kind of crap that was pulled on Voyager for years. Most of the fandom hates it, the writers of DS9 specifically rebelled against it as much as they could, and in general it is not acceptable in modern TV - especially for serialized shows where character continuity is king.
If Discovery had remained an anthology show, there might have been some merit to a last minute time travel event/sacrifice to correct a reality that went wrong (mutiny/start of Klingon war/deaths in the millions/etc.) but that is not this show.
Yeah, I'm gonna base the shows "mission" on what actually appeared on the screen. Because those are actual facts not alt-facts. Your link merely traced the origins of the monologue and doesn't establish it as a mission statement for the ship or the show.
That was never Star Trek's mission statement. It doesn't even qualify as the Enterprise's mission statement. It's just a nice monologue from the opening credits.
I hear you, on all fronts. I, too, was one of those mission essential folks who had to come in to work for no guarantee of pay. And now, just a couple of hours after I got into work...we get a snow storm and I'm back at home! :-)My Sunday (1/21):
- Wife wakes up pissed at me and we fight all day
- Jaguars lose to Patriots and I can't fucking stand the Patriots (but I do respect the hell out of them)
- US government can't get its shit together, shuts down, but I'm one of the ones that is ordered to come to work and not get paid until/if this is resolved
- Dr. Culber seems to be totally dead :-(
- and Captain Lorca is from the damned parallel universe. WTF?
I know, I know, the signs were there and some of you tried to tell me. But I was a Lorca believer, you know? A Lorca apologist, #TeamLorca. I wanted him to be a good guy, but rough around the edges - bucking the stereotypical trend. He reminded me so much of myself. And then, BAMN! He's a straight up sociopathic villain. Well, shit.
I wanted Dr. Culber to still be alive even if they brought him back by some kind of magic. IDC. Can't we have a happy couple on Discovery?
Not really happy with the episode, but still a solid 7 out of 10.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.