There's a fundamental difference between borrowing a physical copy of a book, and borrowing a digital copy, in that the former involves physically moving a physical object that can only be in one place at any given time, while the latter does not.
Which is to say that digital lending libraries of in-copyright material are the one situation in which I support DRM.
Now can we all just drop the hostility, and agree that the OP should have given this a bit more thought, and that some people address everybody as "Dude," regardless of gender, social standing, or anything else?
I've had a somewhat similar situation myself, some years ago, when I was on an Apple board, looking for software to pull in video from non-copy-protected DVDs, one of which was with the blessing of the copyright owner (my best friend), and the other of which I WAS the copyright owner. Because I'd left out those critical details, all of the responses assumed I was looking for software to defeat copy protection (and I actually downloaded one application that could do just that, but couldn't do what I needed it to do!), and the thread was locked, and the responses suppressed, by Apple, under that same assumption; when I started a new thread, I was very explicit about not only the nature of the DVDs, and about what I was NOT looking for, but also about the fact that I'd report any improper referrals myself.
