L
Lord Garth
Guest
Star Trek has never strayed from parallels. Parallels work, it gives the audience something to relate to by seeing something they understand. Bearing that in mind, there was usually a sense that Star Trek wanted to show a possible future, though some things might be similar, it was a different time.
Star Trek VI takes a whole different approach. It's not a future time somewhat similar to ours, it's the 20th Century transplanted with an additional 300 years. Take the year, replace the "19" with a "22", change from international to interplanetary, and you're set.
"But ST VI was only made 16 years ago! What can be different?" It's not the quantity of time so much as the shift in events. ST VI was released during a sensitive time, it came out at the end of one major period, then we went into whatever you want to call the next 10 years, and now we're in the period we've been living in for the past six. So, yes, I think asking about how ST VI would be different if it were made today is valid.
Star Trek VI takes a whole different approach. It's not a future time somewhat similar to ours, it's the 20th Century transplanted with an additional 300 years. Take the year, replace the "19" with a "22", change from international to interplanetary, and you're set.
"But ST VI was only made 16 years ago! What can be different?" It's not the quantity of time so much as the shift in events. ST VI was released during a sensitive time, it came out at the end of one major period, then we went into whatever you want to call the next 10 years, and now we're in the period we've been living in for the past six. So, yes, I think asking about how ST VI would be different if it were made today is valid.