Spoilers ST Strange New Worlds - Starships and Technology Season Three Discussion
- Thread starter Mark_Nguyen
- Start date
Probably not permanent, but it's going to be sitting in Dry Dock for a bit.
It reminded me of the Archer-class scout ship from the TOS novels, although SNW has their own version of the Archer-class based on the old Star Fleet Technical Manual destroyer/scout.
Archer class
For other uses, see Archer. The Archer-class was a type of Federation Starfleet scout vessel in service at least in the 2260s. Archer-class ships were designed to go "very far, very fast, and not be noticed." They go "to the edge of nowhere and peek behind the curtains." The ships are small and...
memory-beta.fandom.com
None of this new Farragut material contradicts TOS "Obsession", I think . Poor gal's been through a lot, losing half the crew to an angry vape cloud, and then both nacelles jettisoned in a strange presaging of Kirk's orders to Scotty in TOS "The Apple", but the Farragut is a tough little ship.
- I found it interesting that Kirk somehow ends up with only his future Enterprise crew to count on when it really should've been Una or Pike leading the away team. Why Spock?
- Re-using existing sets is nothing new, and we've technically already seen the Farragut's bridge, but here we also get the conference room off to the side with the table turned sideways and pictures of a DSC Starbase on the screen.
- Last week there were no scenes set on the bridge, probably so they can have time to convert the sets to Farragut-spec and back again.
- Technically the Farragut's nacelles didn't explode, just just sorta bounced off of the Scavenger ship. Irrecoverable?
Mark
- I found it interesting that Kirk somehow ends up with only his future Enterprise crew to count on when it really should've been Una or Pike leading the away team. Why Spock?
- Re-using existing sets is nothing new, and we've technically already seen the Farragut's bridge, but here we also get the conference room off to the side with the table turned sideways and pictures of a DSC Starbase on the screen.
- Last week there were no scenes set on the bridge, probably so they can have time to convert the sets to Farragut-spec and back again.
- Technically the Farragut's nacelles didn't explode, just just sorta bounced off of the Scavenger ship. Irrecoverable?
Mark
Didn't the Scavenger Ship get exploded by 3x Photon Torpedoes by the USS Farragut immediately afterwards?
If they weren't damaged, by the explosion, they might've been flung far away due to explosion?
Indeed
Seeing that the XCV-100 appears to be largely intact, albeit unpowered, could Starfleet conduct a survey of this ship and recover data from the ship's computers? Or, would they be averse to doing this as essentially this is a grave site and there are moral and ethical issues with any mission to the wreckage site?
Based on the trailers, no
It’s not the same ship though, so they didn’t massacre anything? This is the XCV-100 not 330
It’s Starbase one without the pods. The label is legible in one shot.
Well no, it was exploded by the D7 the torpedoes blew up
Last edited:
And you have on a report that "captain" Kirk saved the day. Sort of. Or at least ended a threat.
But that also places the XCV type ships as starships from the 2050s or so. Pre-First Contact. So was the XCV-330 Enterprise also from that era, or was it a post-First Contact refit of the design with a Vulcan style warp ring?
But that also places the XCV type ships as starships from the 2050s or so. Pre-First Contact. So was the XCV-330 Enterprise also from that era, or was it a post-First Contact refit of the design with a Vulcan style warp ring?
Last edited:
Wasn't the Farrgut just blue graphics but otherwise identical to Enterprise?
EDIT: Oh wait, nevermind it got trashed.
Unknown. But I will point out that there’s no canonical proof that the XCV-330’s ring was reverse engineered from Vulcan ships, or that the ring is even a warp drive at all.
Also, I’m glad that the ship was XCV-100 and not the 330. Having the scavenger ship be another Enterprise would have been far too much small-universe syndrome.
All the red parts of the bridge were replaced with brown ones, and there's Cage style Goose neck screens on some of the outer consoles.
There's more standard looking BoP in the scavenger's belly. I don't think it's a 1:1 copy of the B'Rel, I don't see the black parts thar are usually on the engines. could be a slight redesign like the Enterprise and Romulan BoP
Jörg Hillebrand (@gaghyogi49.bsky.social)
Also seen inside the Scavenger ship in #StarTrekSNW's "The Sehlat Who Ate Its Tail" are various bits and pieces of a very familiar starship: A Klingon Bird-of-Prey! Not the one introduced in season 1 of #StarTrekDiscovery but the one (with slight alterations) from "Star Trek III" and onwards! 😁
bsky.app
Edit: It was meant to be a 22nd century BoP
Last edited:
Jörg Hillebrand (@gaghyogi49.bsky.social)
Here's a comparison of the Bird-of-Prey wing seen inside the Scavenger ship in #StarTrekSNW's "The Sehlat Who Ate Its Tail"↖️, the 23rd/24th century Bird-of-Prey ↗️ and the 22nd century version of the ship from #StarTrekENT ↙️. The SNW ship definitely looks more like ↗️.
bsky.app