• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

ST Phase 2: MIND-SIFTER

From the looks of the Miri screencap posted, it seems they tried to hide that it was a zipper which made the seam open. (velcro wasn't an accepted way to close openings on clothes back in the 60s. It was "new fangled" and not used commercially. It rarely is used commercially now, in fact. Much like what happened when they introduced zippers to men's pants. Most men were terrified that their flys would pop open at any minute (based on first hand sources))

This is a fan film. The VFX, sets, acting etc are magnificant and an extraordinary achievement - to put it mildly. But it's a fanfilm, not a documentary - and no one should hold it those standards - so the major gaffs regarding costuming in the 50s - well, let it go. Patients in a 1959 mental hospital would be lucky to have clothes, never mind shoes. Doctors, nurses and orderlies would be dressed in solid white...from their hats to their hose to their shoes. And a "rec room"...phaleez! Most of these places didn't even have toilet paper in the 1970s when the film crews went in and did exposes'. (I''m speaking as a licensed mental health professional who had to train a lot of these folks on how to use toilet paper)

But, again....it's a fanfilm! Coming up with a costume design they could apply universally and costume as many eras and as many people as they did is remarkable in of itself.
 
At long last, I've completed my review of "Mind-Sifter." I had a lot more to say than I thought. :)

Check it out:

“… That is for the future to decide. A future, I hope, with many possibilities.” — James T. Kirk, “Come What May” pilot episode of STAR TREK: NEW VOYAGES

With those words, STAR TREK: NEW VOYAGES launched an ongoing mission to continue the voyages of the original starship Enterprise that has lasted 10 years so far.

There have been several episodes since the production’s pilot episode, “Come What May,” which is more proof-of-concept than a compelling, well-told adventure. There has been a name change — from STAR TREK: NEW VOYAGES to STAR TREK: PHASE II. Several cast members have come and gone, most notably James Cawley as Captain James T. Kirk. Even the Enterprise herself has changed — resembling her proposed design in the abandoned 70s continuation series.

To mark its 10th Anniversary, the production has gone back to the future, so to speak. They’ve adapted a 70s short story and released it under the show’s original name, STAR TREK: NEW VOYAGES.

Behold the Power of My Mind-Sifter

First, I have to congratulate the production for making it to their 10th anniversary. I also have to give it props for getting out “Mind-Sifter,” an adaptation of Shirley S. Maiewski’s short story that was published in the Bantam collection, Star Trek: The New Voyages.

This is certainly the best looking episode the production’s put out since “World Enough and Time.” And I don’t mean from a visual effects standpoint.

The cinematography is superb, echoing the lighting of the original show’s first season. Jeff Barklage’s camerawork is dynamic, with a sense of motion and energy that has been sorely lacking in a lot of their previous efforts. There are experimental shots that have more of a modern sensibility than a 60s one. With this episode, they’ve broken free of the static, flat two-shots and medium-shots that make me feel like I’m watching dinner theater and not a television production. The shots have depth and personality. And close-ups! Finally, we’re getting to see the emotion on the character’s faces rather than being far removed from them.

Brian Gross has potential as Captain Kirk. He certainly is interesting to watch, and I appreciate him interpreting the role in his own way as opposed to imitating William Shatner wholesale. Gross is a bit too soft-spoken at times. However, that can be chalked up to his performance as a confused, battered Kirk. I look forward to seeing him an episode where he is truly in command — both of the character and the ship.

NEW VOYAGE’s other lead — Brandon Stacey — has to carry the rest of this episode . In past adventures, I’ve found Stacey’s performance to be more Data than Spock. As Leonard Nimoy has pointed out, anyone playing Spock has to play him with an inner life. There is always something going on behind the stoicism. Here, Stacey tries to bring that to his performance — a seething emotion under the surface. But it feels overly forced and Stacey’s delivery seems as if he is trying to make every line, every word self-important. It also doesn’t help that Stacey is given an unmotivated, pedantic speech after the battle with the Klingons. However, Stacey has improved — yet his performance is still off the mark for me.

I’ll be honest — I miss John Kelley, only because I felt that of all the non-professional actors he gave his performance the most heart. But Jeff Bond did an amazing job taking on the role. He has a naturalistic manner in performance and I buy him completely as Dr. McCoy. However, he should drop the southern drawl. Kelly never really had a strong one (unless McCoy was drunk) and I’d much rather Bond focus on his performance than the affectation of an accent. I look forward to seeing more of Bond as McCoy.

Rebecca Raven Wood certainly gives a heartwarming and genuine performance. I enjoy watching her on screen. My quibbles with Dr. Hamlin have very little to do with the actress and more with the story continuously forcing her to be Catherine Barkley to Kirk's Frederic Henry. It is clear Dr. Hamlin is in love with Kirk despite the dialogue trying to tell us otherwise. Her love is plain as day from the performance and context of the scenes. I’d rather she have more professional motivations rather than personal ones. Sure, the dialogue tells us she does but that’s not what the story’s subtext conveys.

Adaptation on the Edge of Forever

Maiewski’s story has never been among my favorites. The concept of the story has potential, but her execution never resonated with me. Kirk stripped of who he is and stuck in a mental institution is a fascinating story with a strong theme — what happens to someone when they can no longer remember the person they once were —that could’ve been explored.

I applaud the production for wanting to adapt as much of the original story as possible. At least, unlike “Kitumba,” the production didn’t add tons of unnecessary connect-the-canon-dot elements that add nothing to the story.

Adaptations can either be faithful or they can only take inspiration from the source. For example, the FIGHT CLUB movie is the most faithful adaptation of a novel I’ve seen (although, the film makes the story more linear than the novel was). FROM HELL is hardly as complex or clever as Alan Moore’s graphic novel and it could be argued that the film didn’t take much inspiration from the source material. Or adaptations can certainly carve their own path — much like how POINT BREAK resembles nothing of Kem Nunn’s excellent novel, TAPPING THE SOURCE, which the film was based on.

Here I wish NEW VOYAGES merely was inspired by the source and used it to create a more interesting and clever story. But I will admit that’s how I would’ve approached the adaptation. Because whatever problems I have with the episodic version of “Mind-Sifter” come mostly from the original story — the crew acting unprofessional, the trope of the female caregiver falling for her patient, and the time-travel elements.

Nevertheless, “Mind-Sifter” is an accomplishment that appropriately caps a 10-year voyage. The future is filled with possibilities for many more Treks from the little Ticonderoga starship that could.
 
Last edited:
......

We see Spock and McCoy prepare to beam down to the Guardian, then all of a sudden McCoy is bursting into Kirk's room in the hospital. Did I miss something? How did they find him? How did they get into the hospital?

....................


When Spock and McCoy are talking the computer completed a search. On the monitor you can see a picture of Kirk laying on a table in Dr. Wrights office. (The newspaper guys put that picture in the newspaper of 1958).
When Spock and McCoy beam down they go through the Guardian (but we don't see that) but later when Kirk and Spock are having a conversation Spock mentioned that the Guardian put them within 5 weeks after Kirk arrival in 1958.
 
It's worth noting that the "25 to 50 years from now" that Theiss referenced has just about come and gone--without the advent of any major newfangled clothing closure methods to supplant the ones from 1966. Maybe zippers and buttons and Velcro really are the closures of the future, since Theiss' future seems to have arrived.
I think im missing something, Roddenberry was building a vision of the future containing countless predictions about the future, but not ok with predicting how clothes might be done up in the future?
 
......

We see Spock and McCoy prepare to beam down to the Guardian, then all of a sudden McCoy is bursting into Kirk's room in the hospital. Did I miss something? How did they find him? How did they get into the hospital?

....................


When Spock and McCoy are talking the computer completed a search. On the monitor you can see a picture of Kirk laying on a table in Dr. Wrights office. (The newspaper guys put that picture in the newspaper of 1958).
When Spock and McCoy beam down they go through the Guardian (but we don't see that) but later when Kirk and Spock are having a conversation Spock mentioned that the Guardian put them within 5 weeks after Kirk arrival in 1958.
Personally I thought that was a solid choice. I don't think there was much to be gained by padding the story out for another ten minutes showing them travelling back in time and working their way into the asylum. They're in orbit of the Time Planet, and they know where and when Kirk is thanks to the newspaper article. I think it's pretty explicit how they found him. YMMV of course. :)
 
Nor I. As I said before, I thought it was a sensible and entirely valid choice here. We knew enough about what was going on to intimate how Spock and Bones got back to 1958 and found Kirk.
 
Fair enough. I thought it was just glossed over. Maybe when McCoy asked where Kirk was, Spock could have pointed to the screen and said, "1958."

That's just my take.
 
QUOTE: ... I would have stayed the course, finished the earlier version and been derided for having it be even further from the TOS formula.

As both a writer and video production type, I can empathize with production headaches, but if there's anything that I know it's that no matter WHAT you do, someone's going to gripe. As Joss Whedon said, (not that I have any connection to him, mind you...) keep your universe consistent, unless it'd be really cool....
 
Finally got round to watching this Episode and really enjoyed it, kudos to all involved.

The Cawley cameo was priceless. :lol:
 
DoubleHiFive, Mark Edward Lewis here, Director of Mind-Sifter. First, allow me to say thanks for a wonderful review of our movie. I believe you perceived so much of the subtext of what I was trying to get across in the performances and editing. I greatly appreciate the time and effort you put forth in a wonderful and forensic review.

I apologize for the delay in reply; I was out of town this weekend and only this morning had the time to sit down and compose this response. I thank you for your taking the time to write a reasoned and informative response. Too often (at least on this message board) it's very easy for these things to devolve into petty fights and snipes. It is not at all my intention for our interaction to be that way at all. I appreciate greatly your approaching the discussion the same way. Allow me a moment, before responding to your comments below to again say that regardless of my quibbles I was highly entertained by "Mind-Sifter" and thoroughly enjoyed it. Congratulations to you on a job well done, and more importantly, thank you.

I'm compelled to clarify a few of your queries just so there's no confusion, and in no way am I attempting to downplay or argue your legitimate opinion. Merely clarification for the enjoyment of the many people who I trust will read your excellent review:

1. When we say the "audio is terrible throughout," I believe what you mean is the dialogue is terrible throughout. I trust you were able to watch the 5.1 surround version which is completely different movie than the simple stereo-on-internet. I also trust you were able to watch and listen on a good system rather than computer speakers (Apple TV not being one of those 'good systems'). This said, I agree that the dialogue is something the sound production crew struggled with in the new studio. Many of the ADR lines had to be conformed to the set audio and some of the fidelity suffered. However, I don't believe the performances suffered and the intent and flow of the movie seems to okay. However, I agree, of the technical issues, we have struggled with dialogue.

You're right. The audio per se is fine but my issues were definitely with how the dialogue was coming across. I watched the YouTube version of the film on my laptop mainly because for some reason despite being able to easily find the episode on YouTube via Google Chrome on my MacBook, I was unable to find it on YouTube via my AppleTV. Every iteration I typed in, including the literal word-for-word subject name of the video on YouTube yielded nothing the first night of the show's release. It's entirely possible I just need to listen to the episode as you suggest, but as has been queried earlier by IndySolo, I'm not sure that AppleTV supports 5.1 sound?

2. you are certainly correct. 20,000 feet was aired in 1963...and to have 3 Captain Kirk's on the screen at the same time was just TOO JUICY to pass up!

Oh I know. I loved it. And you are absolutely right - the chance to have three Kirks on screen at once was priceless, and reminded me very much of James Bond driving the tricked-out Aston Martin DB5 in Skyfall. It's just too cool an idea to not do, and I am totally okay with the anachronism of it, which I probably could have been more effusive about.

3. I'm glad you appreciate the space battle - in all its brevity. Actually, it has nothing to do with the JJ-trek versions and is my personal experience as the most efficient and powerful way a Connie can defend against the first-strike capability of a D-7 Mark IV while playing FASA Starship Combat Simulator hundreds of times growing up. Consider the barrel-roll defense a childhood dream-come-true which Tobias Richter executed with diplomb...and for me, as you mentioned, the "tactical playbook" Gamma-3 which Spock would have invented LONG before the 24th century version - was the perfect opportunity to show the Enterprise doing something it would never otherwise do - under the command of a commander it would never otherwise have in Spock. Too much fun!

For it's brevity here, I thought the space battle was entirely and appropriately subtle. I know there are others who disagree, but if it had to be included, I'm pleased that it wasn't the focus of the hour nor the only spectacle therein. About my only issue with it is that the Klingons seemingly got away so easily. :shrug:

4. Most of your consideration for our "adaptation of the story" toward JJ-trek had nothing to do with that...we were staying true to the characters given the wonderful script. Whereas, Spock and Kirk are both managing insanity from their psychic link being stretched 350 years or so. Thus, Spock is quite emotional, and Kirk is, well, insane. Brandon and I had a wonderful time exploring the nuances of just what that would look like in this universe, and I believe we nailed a palatable performance for humans to watch and Vulcans to be slightly embarrassed about. :D Moreover, for me, of any Spock I've ever seen on screen, including Leonard, Stacy is superior.

Fair enough. I admit, the comparison to Star Trek Into Darkness was entirely supposition on my part given the similar thematic elements (notably, the Kirk/Spock friendship) but I am happy to digress. I don't know that I'd say Brandon Stacy is superior to Nimoy himself, but we also have never seen Nimoy do these kinds of scenes or this kind of story before, so it's hard to draw comparisons on such specifics.

5. When we talk about "poorly framed shots" I must defend the choices of world-class Cinematographer Jeff Barklage. We specifically and purposefully worked toward artistic composition found in modern artwork and the understood cinema rules around position instead of just framing actors in the horrific middle-of-screen position done in TOS. Much like my choice to do this episode in 4:3, my intent, due to the nature of the script, was to emphasize the performance of the actors at every step; to engage them and connect them more with the audience. Splitting the screen in the middle actually disconnects actors from THEMSELVES in a scene - and thus the viewer. So, we did purposeful avoidance of center-screen composition not just because it serves the story better, but because it just looks aweful. The "wasted space" is actually called negative space and, especially in the example you have of McCoy's salute, would have no ability to be framed had there been no such space - or the camera or focal length of the lens would be so removed from our characters as to lose the moment. And just as a correction, there is no Steadicam work in this film.//quote]

And here I will admit I was completely wrong. I re-watched the episode with Daren Dochterman's effects the other day, and having read your initial comments beforehand, I did recognize exactly what you describe. It's a powerfully subtle but also direct way to further drive home what's going on and I'm honestly a little embarrassed that I didn't catch it the first time around.

6. Spock's self-mind-meld is a wonderful device we came up with which is the last-resort of Spock to try to find his friend in the psychic link, since he had no other way to get in touch with his friend. Naturally, since no one had ever thought of such a thing, to have your concern about it is a wonderful win for myself as a story-teller given that, as a device, the intention was to wake viewers up and engage their minds...which clearly in your case (and so many others who have voiced concern and glee) we succeeded. As a plot link, it opens up an entire new world to the relationship of Spock and Kirk. Thanks for noticing all. Por Todo Gracias.

I can see how that might make sense. To me, it felt a little odd, but I also will admit that this might just be due to how I've always perceived the mind melds to work. Reaching out with your hand and fingers to another person strengthens the telepathic connection to that person because they're not you. It seemed like it was overkill for Spock to do this since he is in fact himself. Given the mitigating circumstances you describe, and which we are seeing on screen though, as I said, in that context I can see why you might make this particular choice.

7. I defend my friend Tobias Richter's work as superior to anything in the JJ verse or ANY verse. His work is superior and non-derivative.

I will absolutely concur that Tobias Richter's work is stunning and quite masterful. I don't know enough about visual effects to claim any kind of expertise in the area, but I know what works and I know what I like, and I know that every frame of footage I've seen of Tobias' work has always worked and I've always liked it.

8. And I know as much fun as it is to continue harping on the Vic/James issues, both men are personal friends of mine. Although I was the Post Supervisor and final editor on Kitumba, I was not allowed jurisdiction on Vic's directorial placement in that movie - the position of which I feel badly about.

You'll have to let me apologize for that comment if you interpreted it as being directed toward you. It was not. In the lead-up to Kitumba's release, a big stink was made here on this board (which I willingly participated) over the issue because I thought it entirely unprofessional and regardless of the circumstances, unfair to Vic to have his credit listed that way when every single New Voyages and Phase II episode before (and now, after) listed their director credit at the head of the episode (save "To Serve All My Days," which apparently had no director credit at all.) This was my (perhaps too) snarky way of commenting on the issue without going into further specifics.

However, as director on Mind-Sifter I did request (as was my right to request) the director single title card. As surely as I would not slight James, I would not slight Vic. Both men are involved in making the world a better place via productions surrounding IDIC. I salute them both. My credit should be considered to be solely a record of my involvement, and it has no bearing on anything else...well...okay...except that I'm proud of it as well. :D

And I totally support all of that. And you have every right to be proud of your achievement here.

9. I'm afraid you are incorrect. That is, in fact K-7. Please see Kitumba and other episodes.

I realized this also -- someone else commented earlier that the "K-8" I spotted was in fact a "K-B," wherein the "K-7" was difficult to discern in that particular shot. (This is me eating my words. Yum!)

10. Thank you for catching the McCoy continuity. I'll fix that for any BD/DVD release!

11. Thanks too for noticing my other childhood dream...ahem...of the all female night shift. OH MY!!

:lol:

I'll also confirm that THT is well on its way to being a similarly successful and emotionally riveting STNV film. And again, thank you SO MUCH for your wonderful review and careful consideration. I wish more reviewers were as concise and will written and read as you.

IDIC in all things.

Mark Edward Lewis

I am quite looking forward to both "The Holiest Thing" and "Bread and Savagery" as well as all the future episodes and vignettes New Voyages/Phase II will release. Again I'll say that it's a pleasure to watch these, even if I'm critical about them (whether fairly or not) and I appreciate greatly your taking the time to respond.
 
Fair enough. I admit, the comparison to Star Trek Into Darkness was entirely supposition on my part given the similar thematic elements (notably, the Kirk/Spock friendship) but I am happy to digress. I don't know that I'd say Brandon Stacy is superior to Nimoy himself, but we also have never seen Nimoy do these kinds of scenes or this kind of story before, so it's hard to draw comparisons on such specifics.


Anyone who suggests that Stacy (or any other Spock actor) is superior to Nimoy is out of their mind. Sacrilege! lmao.

eta:
Ok, I noticed the :D on the original post, so I'll assume such a comparison is a joke. :)

I did enjoy the production quite a bit. For me the best part was the interaction between Spock and McCoy, really liked the new McCoy actor.

I'll have to see Brian Gross in the Captain's Chair a bit more to get a feel for him, I couldn't really buy him as Kirk in this. I can't imagine any circumstances where he would break down and cry on someone's shoulder. He suffers alone no matter how screwed up he is. Paradise Syndrome and Requiem are good examples of this. I also can't see him going down without even attempting to fight. I guess he got a few licks in, in the beginning, but he just appears to give up near the end.

Maybe this portrayal is more akin to "Good Kirk" in Enemy Within, but I never considered Kirk as himself in that episode, either. So whether Kirk's character was altered by a transporter malfunction or whether the Mind Sifter created some hormone adjustments, his character was almost unrecognizable.

Hopefully we'll see him in command (of himself and the ship) in future episodes. But overall an entertaining story and well done production.
 
Last edited:
I'd keep the McCoy tunic change. It's not like that never happened on the original series. Check out "Mudd's Women".

Neil
 
Okay, I haven't weighed in on these things recently, mostly because I haven't really liked the last couple. I'd rather not say anything unless I have something positive...

This was top class. I was emotionally engaged, never bored, had a few belly laughs ("Elvis" got a huge gaffaw out of me: "I hate that guy!"), and was even moved to eye mist toward the end. All of that outweighs the issues I did have (sound, casting, one or two performance choices and Admiral Whitlow having the same name as the actor - wtf?). Brian Gross is really very good. He gave a strong performance in a tricky role. Brandon Stacy also did well.

Total hats off for the direction. Mark Edward Lewis has a great eye for composition and it was very imaginatively shot. Pacing was great. Jeff Bond's music editing was very well done. Too often fan films just lay on the cues and let them run, starting a comedy cue long before the punchline ("hey this is FUNNY!"). Jeff was the right guy to do this. Not perfect, but much better. I still think less is more, but overall very nice.

Full marks, folks. Thanks for making me laugh, almost cry and just generally enjoy. A classy production all around. Well done!
 
Last edited:
The best since World Enough and Time . HANDS DOWN. It felt like proper Trek; very ambitious with Kor and the Guardian too.

I watched with the modern effects but it still felt like a 60s episode. I loved John Kelley as McCoy and couldn't help but feel saddened by his departure but Jeff Bond EXCELS in the role - the voice particularly reminds me of Deforest. Brian Gross was very good as Kirk and taking a starring role I still love Brandon as Spock.

Bravo all round, here's to the next one!

I concur, 120%. As someone said earlier, this episode gets twelve starships out of ten! I was moved by the performances and dazzled by the visual effects and videography. Sure, the sound could have been better, but that's a minor nit--well done, guys!
 
I got a kick out of the button-pushing, paper-shuffling Admiral. He never made eye contact with Spock, too busy multi-tasking, I guess. lol. There should have been a reaction shot of Spock as he left, a Vulcan eye-roll.
 
I got a kick out of the button-pushing, paper-shuffling Admiral. He never made eye contact with Spock, too busy multi-tasking, I guess. lol. There should have been a reaction shot of Spock as he left, a Vulcan eye-roll.

It's like every episode of "Law and Order." The guy at the docks keeps moving crates.

"Listen, buddy: I've got a ship comin' in."
"If ya want, we can continue this conversation down at Rikers Island."
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top