Agree.Watched it again last night. Still utterly captivating.
It makes me want that fourth film that much more.
Last edited:
Agree.Watched it again last night. Still utterly captivating.
For longtime fans, perhaps the strangest thing about watching the 2009 Star Trek in 2019, and only a few weeks after the nostalgia-laden Season 2 finale of Star Trek: Discovery, is that, if you squint, it almost doesn’t feel like a reboot at all. If you were to ignore the fact that the USS Enterprise is supposedly a brand new starship in this film, and that most of the movie happens in 2258, which puts it a few years earlier than the “real” original series, the entire film could scan as a passable sequel to the last scene of the Discovery Season 2 finale.
In Star Trek (2009), Spock (Zachary Quinto) and Pike (Bruce Greenwood) seem like they've been friends for a while, Starfleet is rebuilding its recruits after the events of the Klingon War, and for the most part, the aesthetic of the universe, more or less, feels like a natural progression of what we saw in Discovery. Fans who are overly preoccupied with these canon distinctions (and I’m one of those people, by the way) can get lost in debating all the ways in which Abrams and company’s alternate "Kelvin Timeline" doesn’t even play by its own rules, much less the rules of Star Trek in general. But numerous new directors and writers had rewritten the aesthetic of Star Trek many, many times before.
Timelines never bothered me, so this is kind of funnever realized that DISCO S2 could pretty much directly tie in with ST09 but I guess it can really (if you ignore the conflicting timeline years)
interesting article :
https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/10-ye...r-trek-reboot-fueled-the-modern-geek-universe
never realized that DISCO S2 could pretty much directly tie in with ST09 but I guess it can really (if you ignore the conflicting timeline years)
that's what they were were trying to do with Shatner (end hologram)If I could change one thing about the movie, it would be to have no obvious set up of Prime Spock before his appearance and to keep Nimoy's role completely secret. If that had been done, I think all our minds would have been blown.
that's what they were were trying to do with Shatner (end hologram)
Went to see it at a massive Imax theatre in a science park as it was 'something special'. Imax was still new then and I'd never seen a screen that enormous. Haven't seen one that large since either - that one's gone now.
Sadly, didn't think Imax was worth it anyway, but that's not the film's fault.
Came out having enjoyed it but thinking it was a bit dumb. Didn't like the new Enterprise and thought Pine was...O.K.ish at best. Really didn't like Cho, Yelchin and Pegg but Quinto was good and Urban standout. Over the next day or two I picked more and more plot holes in it and then had some of them explained/discussed away. My appreciation didn't rise.
I still think it's the best of a bad lot and that the series got steadily worse. I still want to see the others and purchased the Blurays because it's Trek, but to be honest, the only JJ films I've halfway liked are Mission Impossible movies and they're supposed to be big and dumb.
It didn't really take off. As I said, I was underwhelmed and I just don't think it paid for itself.It's strange that they got rid of the big Imax screen when it was still new.
In my area, there is one "true" Imax theater with the gigantic screen, six stories tall. Some multiplex cinemas have the "lite" version of Imax with a screen that's slightly bigger than a regular theater screen, but that doesn't appeal to me at all. If I'm going to pay extra for the "Imax" name, then I want to be absolutely overwhelmed by the gigantic size.
Kor
We have one FULL IMAX commercial cinema and another that is usually reserved for the science centre but occasionally shows commercial releases. If at all possible I try catch IMAX films there—especially if they have actual IMAX footage (like Into Darkness, The Dark Knight, Dunkirk, etc.). However, if we’re going to a presentation that doesn’t have such footage, I often go to the closer “lite-IMAX” cinema for a few reasons.It's strange that they got rid of the big Imax screen when it was still new.
In my area, there is one "true" Imax theater with the gigantic screen, six stories tall. Some multiplex cinemas have the "lite" version of Imax with a screen that's slightly bigger than a regular theater screen, but that doesn't appeal to me at all. If I'm going to pay extra for the "Imax" name, then I want to be absolutely overwhelmed by the gigantic size.
Kor
"Prime" Kirk was young to be a starship captain, but like, not that young.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.