• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spock Autobiography - David Goodman

Uh oh. Are they getting gun-shy about the book? It's about Spock! Have the Kirk and Picard books done okay? This new one is about Spock, he is iconic. And with the second season of Discovery so recent, there's incentive to strike while the iron is hot. What is it with publishers, sometimes?
David Goodman is a member of the writing staff for The Orville, so that's probably taking up a lot of his time. We ran into the same thing with Kirsten Beyer's next Voyager novel, it was postponed shortly after she got hired on Discover, and it's taken a couple years for it to finally come out.
There's also the chance that he might have decided to go back and add stuff from Discovery season 2, and with The Orville taking up most of his time he probably doesn't have a ton of time to write this.
 
This is the second time this has happened with a David A. Goodman Star Trek book and a Seth MacFarlane TV series. Over a dozen years ago, Goodman was slated to do a novel about Will Decker, but then he became the showrunner of Family Guy and got too busy. That novel ended up being cancelled entirely.
 
This is the second time this has happened with a David A. Goodman Star Trek book and a Seth MacFarlane TV series. Over a dozen years ago, Goodman was slated to do a novel about Will Decker, but then he became the showrunner of Family Guy and got too busy. That novel ended up being cancelled entirely.

Oh, that's interesting! That would have been great, to have a novel focused on Will Decker, of all characters. Too bad it didn't work out.
 
This is the second time this has happened with a David A. Goodman Star Trek book and a Seth MacFarlane TV series. Over a dozen years ago, Goodman was slated to do a novel about Will Decker, but then he became the showrunner of Family Guy and got too busy. That novel ended up being cancelled entirely.
when a novel gets cancelled like that, can another author come along and take the ball? Like if you decided to do a Will Decker book with your own original story?
 
when a novel gets cancelled like that, can another author come along and take the ball?

It happens that way all the time in TV and movies -- and in comics too, I guess -- but rarely in prose. During the era when Roddenberry's assistant Richard Arnold was micromanaging the Trek novels, a couple (Probe and A Flag Full of Stars) were taken away from their original authors and finished by other authors, but the original authors were none too happy about it and it wasn't publicized (the books were still published under the original authors' names).

The only time I've known it to happen voluntarily was with DS9: Fearful Symmetry. It was originally announced as being written by Leanna Morrow, but eventually Morrow chose to withdraw from the project for undisclosed reasons (although it was a mutual decision between her and editor Marco Palmieri) and Olivia Woods was assigned to write the book instead. However, Woods started over from scratch and did her own version, which is why the book was delayed so long -- and why it ended up being split in two (Fearful Symmetry and The Soul Key), since it turned out much longer than originally planned. But in that case, it was an installment of an ongoing series, so it makes sense that another author would've had to be assigned to fill the slot. With a standalone novel like Decker, there wouldn't have been the same need.


Like if you decided to do a Will Decker book with your own original story?

As it happened, I did delve into Decker's character somewhat in my debut novel Ex Machina, which came out before Decker would have, IIRC.
 
It's never been a requirement in comics that a miniseries tell a single storyline, merely that it be finite in length.
Nor in television, for that matter. Indeed, Babylon 5 could be regarded as the longest miniseries in history, because from the initial concept, JMS intended it to run for a maximum (and preferred) length of 5 years, beginning the "Vorlons vs. Shadows" arc in the first season, and slowly moving from mostly standalone episodes to mostly arc episodes until the arc was resolved. (Particularly telling is that the final episode was written, filmed, assembled, and ready for airing by the end of the fourth season, and then, when the fifth season was given the green light [not by the original network, as I recall], held for a full year.) I'm sure that's not the only TV miniseries to tell more than one story (Tom Hanks' From The Earth to the Moon comes to mind, since each Apollo mission depicted had its own story within the overall arc), although most TV minseries have been far too short for that.
 
Nor in television, for that matter. Indeed, Babylon 5 could be regarded as the longest miniseries in history, because from the initial concept, JMS intended it to run for a maximum (and preferred) length of 5 years, beginning the "Vorlons vs. Shadows" arc in the first season, and slowly moving from mostly standalone episodes to mostly arc episodes until the arc was resolved.

It's a bit disingenuous to use "mini-" for a 5-year, 110-episode series, though. Even "limited series" would be pushing it, since 5 years is a long run for a TV series; most shows are lucky to make it to a second season, let alone a fifth. (Before Star Trek: TNG, the only American SF/fantasy shows that made it longer than 5 seasons were Adventures of Superman and Bewitched.) Indeed, many shows today are designed with the expectation of running 5 years; it's become pretty much the standard target length for first-run syndicated or cable shows.

The term "miniseries" was originally used in TV to apply to productions like Rich Man, Poor Man and Roots that ran for 8-12 hours and were aired over a limited period (7 weeks for the former and 8 consecutive days for the latter). Later on, in the '80s and '90s, it became standard to use it (somewhat inaccurately) for 4- to 6-hour productions that were aired in movie-length installments over 2-3 consecutive nights, like the two V miniseries or the various Robert Halmi-produced miniseries that the SciFi Channel used to air. Generally the term has been limited to productions that have a single finite run that's shorter than the 13-episode minimum season length of a typical ongoing show. (Although there have been miniseries that have spun off ongoing series, including V and SciFi's Battlestar Galactica.)


(Particularly telling is that the final episode was written, filmed, assembled, and ready for airing by the end of the fourth season, and then, when the fifth season was given the green light [not by the original network, as I recall], held for a full year.)

That's because the show was cancelled in syndication after season 4. Once JMS learned that the syndication package (the Prime Time Entertainment Network, PTEN) wasn't going to pick up a fifth season, he reworked his plans to compress the last two seasons' arc into just one season, which meant moving up "Sleeping in Light" to be the 4th-season finale. But then TNT picked up season 5 and saved the show from cancellation, so JMS wrote a new finale for season 4 and postponed the already-filmed "Sleeping in Light" until the end of season 5 where it had been originally meant to go. He had to piece together a new season 5 arc from a mix of leftover subplots excised from season 4 and moved-up plans for post-B5 movies and series, which is why season 5 feels like something of an afterthought separate from the arc of seasons 2-4.

So far from being the result of meticulous advance planning, the early filming of "Sleeping in Light" was the result of things not going to plan and having to be changed on the fly. The myth of B5 is that every last detail was perfectly planned out 5 years in advance, but in fact, JMS's plan for the series went through constant reworkings due to external circumstances -- the syndicators demanding cast changes after the pilot, other cast changes forced on the show for other reasons, story editor Larry DiTillio leaving after season 2, and so forth. What made his plan work is that it wasn't ironclad, but highly flexible, changing constantly to adapt to the unexpected. JMS was fond of quoting the military saying "No plan ever survives its first encounter with the enemy." So he understood the need to be adaptable. "Sleeping in Light" is an example of that. He moved it up to the end of season 4 when he learned PTEN wouldn't pick up season 5, but he did it in a way (by time-jumping it decades into the future) that made it easy to postpone it another year if he managed to get a season-5 pickup some other way -- or possibly even longer if the syndicator or network had insisted on a season 6.
 
The myth of B5 is that every last detail was perfectly planned out 5 years in advance...

Sorry, but can you point to references claiming this? Besides internet/YouTube trolls, that is, who spread clickbait disinformation.

It seems like a strawman argument — nobody who knows anything about the history of B5 believes JMS had 110 episodes (and 5 movies) plotted out in advance. I’m puzzled why you’d make a reference like that.
 
Nor in television, for that matter. Indeed, Babylon 5 could be regarded as the longest miniseries in history, because from the initial concept, JMS intended it to run for a maximum (and preferred) length of 5 years, beginning the "Vorlons vs. Shadows" arc in the first season, and slowly moving from mostly standalone episodes to mostly arc episodes until the arc was resolved. (Particularly telling is that the final episode was written, filmed, assembled, and ready for airing by the end of the fourth season, and then, when the fifth season was given the green light [not by the original network, as I recall], held for a full year.) I'm sure that's not the only TV miniseries to tell more than one story (Tom Hanks' From The Earth to the Moon comes to mind, since each Apollo mission depicted had its own story within the overall arc), although most TV minseries have been far too short for that.
Quite a few shows these days will plan multiseason arcs out in advance. I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that Eric Kripke and co. had at least a basic idea of what was going to happen in Supernatural up to Season 5. And I've come across a few other interviews with showrunners who have said they already know the stories for the first few seasons of the show.
 
Quite a few shows these days will plan multiseason arcs out in advance. I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that Eric Kripke and co. had at least a basic idea of what was going to happen in Supernatural up to Season 5. And I've come across a few other interviews with showrunners who have said they already know the stories for the first few seasons of the show.

Yeah, but Babylon 5 basically pioneered that approach. It was the template for how most TV series are now made, with distinct season-long arcs and a multi-year plan with an eventual endgame in mind. Although I think Buffy the Vampire Slayer may deserve credit for the formula of each season having a distinct "Big Bad" (at the very least, it coined that term for a seasonal arc's main villain) -- at least where American prime time TV is concerned, since Japanese tokusatsu and anime shows had been doing season-long arcs since the '70s.
 
Yes, and the thing about B5 is that JMS very specifically intended the story arc to run for 5 years, and while he provided early-exit strategies in case the series was canceled early (one of which, as I noted, came within a hairsbreadth of being used), and strategies for dealing with cast members wanting out, he did not provide an option for a longer run, other than to produce a sequel series.
 
Yes, and the thing about B5 is that JMS very specifically intended the story arc to run for 5 years, and while he provided early-exit strategies in case the series was canceled early (one of which, as I noted, came within a hairsbreadth of being used), and strategies for dealing with cast members wanting out, he did not provide an option for a longer run, other than to produce a sequel series.

Sure he did. He already cannibalized some elements of those sequel plans for the reworked season 5, after he compressed his planned season 4-5 arc into season 4. So if, hypothetically, TNT had driven a dump truck full of money into his driveway and said "Give us a season 6," he would've been able to rework his sequel plans into a season 6 of B5, as he already did somewhat for season 5. (Heck, that might've been better than the mess we got with Crusade.)

It makes no sense to say he prepared for other contingencies but was somehow too shortsighted or inflexible to cope with this one, and it makes even less sense to present that as a positive. Nothing in this business is so rigid. Given the right circumstances, any plan can be changed. Supernatural's producers intended to end the show with season 5, but now it's heading into a concluding season 15. Elementary's producers intended to end their show last year with season 6, then CBS renewed it for a 7th season. While we're at it, Arthur Conan Doyle killed off Sherlock Holmes "definitively" 6 years into the original prose series, then brought him back 8 years later and kept going for another 26 years. Even the firmest series-ending plans can be scuttled if the people buying the stories insist firmly enough on a continuation.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top