Spin off topic, anyone you wouldn't save their life if you could.

[Robert Maxwell]

I am just an informed citizen...

At best, that statement is only 50% correct.

admitted to having confederate ancestors, you know I am legal, so I get your joke...

haha...very funny, since I

Oh shit, I think the G-men got her in mid-post.

 

[Ninjacore]

No lincoln is responsible for the deaths of those people, not Jefferson Davis, he was only defending his country...atleast Booth got lincoln in the end ...

You are just cute as a button. How'd we get so lucky to end up with you here? Was Stormfront's summer intern program all booked up?

Let's see...

"No value in human life"
OK to celebrate presidential assassinations
Qaddafi is awesome
Delusions of grandeur/glory

None of these are good, but in combination--there's a lot more I could say, but I hope you do stay home and never vote.

I am just an informed citizen...

...and you could also save 2 bytes of internet traffic with every post if you learned to use periods.



(Now somebody's going to pop in and say it's more than 2 bytes if it's unicode)

Stormfront is a site full of idiots raving about the evil jew, the evil jew foreclosed my home, the evil jew is plotting to wipe out the white race with black men...please don't compare me to those idiots...and don't hate on the dots baby...

 

[Squiggy]

Not every country has a democracy, get over it

In a dictatorship the only person who decides who the valid leader is.... is the dictator himself.

Which sort of defeats the point of "validity".

no it doesn't, whoever has the power retains the power, that has been the law of humanity for longer then history has been recorded, why do you think that has changed any...

That runs counter to your idea on the Civil War.

The US retained power. Get over it.

 

[Ninjacore]

In a dictatorship the only person who decides who the valid leader is.... is the dictator himself.

Which sort of defeats the point of "validity".

no it doesn't, whoever has the power retains the power, that has been the law of humanity for longer then history has been recorded, why do you think that has changed any...

That runs counter to your idea on the Civil War.

The US retained power. Get over it.

Not when you have prior legally ratified documents agreeing to seccesion or what not...

 

[Deckerd]

I'd love to know what seccesion is. It sounds naughty.

 

[Ninjacore]

I'd love to know what seccesion is. It sounds naughty.

You resorting to being grammar nazi proves I am right...

 

[ITL]

I'd love to know what seccesion is. It sounds naughty.

Filthy tart.

I'd love to know what seccesion is. It sounds naughty.

You resorting to being grammar nazi proves I am right...

About what?

 

[Ninjacore]

I'd love to know what seccesion is. It sounds naughty.

Filthy tart.

I'd love to know what seccesion is. It sounds naughty.

You resorting to being grammar nazi proves I am right...

About what?

READ ABOVE YOU, what did she post her response to, if this was paper i'd draw aline but I cannot...

 

[Squiggy]

WHAT MANNER OF SORCERY IS THIS?!?!

 

[iguana_tonante]

 

[ITL]

I'd love to know what seccesion is. It sounds naughty.

Filthy tart.

You resorting to being grammar nazi proves I am right...

About what?

READ ABOVE YOU, what did she post her response to, if this was paper i'd draw aline but I cannot...

But what are you right about? I ask, in order to be enlightened.

 

[Ninjacore]

Filthy tart.

About what?

READ ABOVE YOU, what did she post her response to, if this was paper i'd draw aline but I cannot...

But what are you right about? I ask, in order to be enlightened.

About the original legal agreement that was formed when the states became the united states of america, the right to secede...

 

[ITL]

READ ABOVE YOU, what did she post her response to, if this was paper i'd draw aline but I cannot...

But what are you right about? I ask, in order to be enlightened.

About the original legal agreement that was formed when the states became the united states of america, the right to secede...

And what's that got to do with being a grammar nazi?

 

[Ninjacore]

But what are you right about? I ask, in order to be enlightened.

About the original legal agreement that was formed when the states became the united states of america, the right to secede...

And what's that got to do with being a grammar nazi?

Instead of answering my response, she attacked my grammar bc she had no basis to prove me wrong...

 

[ITL]

About the original legal agreement that was formed when the states became the united states of america, the right to secede...

And what's that got to do with being a grammar nazi?

Instead of answering my response, she attacked my grammar bc she had no basis to prove me wrong...

Are you a mind reader?

 

[Squiggy]

READ ABOVE YOU, what did she post her response to, if this was paper i'd draw aline but I cannot...

But what are you right about? I ask, in order to be enlightened.

About the original legal agreement that was formed when the states became the united states of america, the right to secede...

1. You should capitalize United States of America, otherwise you hate America and the terrorists win.

About the original legal agreement that was formed when the states became the united states of america, the right to secede...

And what's that got to do with being a grammar nazi?

Instead of answering my response, she attacked my grammar bc she had no basis to prove me wrong...

I do!

2. Article IV, section 3; Constitution of the United States of America

New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

It could easily be argued that a Confederate State of South Carolina would indeed be considered a new state within the jurisdiction of the United State of South Carolina and as such would not have been legally erected "without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress".

Next?

 

[Deckerd]

About the original legal agreement that was formed when the states became the united states of america, the right to secede...

And what's that got to do with being a grammar nazi?

Instead of answering my response, she attacked my grammar bc she had no basis to prove me wrong...

Correction. I attacked your spelling. Do you understand the difference?

 

[Ninjacore]

But what are you right about? I ask, in order to be enlightened.

About the original legal agreement that was formed when the states became the united states of america, the right to secede...

1. You should capitalize United States of America, otherwise you hate America and the terrorists win.

2. Article IV, section 3; Constitution of the United States of America

New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

It could easily be argued that a Confederate State of South Carolina would indeed be considered a new state within the jurisdiction of the United State of South Carolina and as such would not have been legally erected "without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress".

Next?

No new states were being formed, they were simply leaving...

 

[Squiggy]

About the original legal agreement that was formed when the states became the united states of america, the right to secede...

1. You should capitalize United States of America, otherwise you hate America and the terrorists win.

2. Article IV, section 3; Constitution of the United States of America

New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

It could easily be argued that a Confederate State of South Carolina would indeed be considered a new state within the jurisdiction of the United State of South Carolina and as such would not have been legally erected "without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress".

Next?

No new states were being formed, they were simply leaving...

Which was forming a new state.

 

[Ninjacore]

1. You should capitalize United States of America, otherwise you hate America and the terrorists win.

2. Article IV, section 3; Constitution of the United States of America
It could easily be argued that a Confederate State of South Carolina would indeed be considered a new state within the jurisdiction of the United State of South Carolina and as such would not have been legally erected "without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress".

Next?

No new states were being formed, they were simply leaving...

Which was forming a new state.

No, they retained their original boundaries, not new states the same old state, just casting aside the oppressive tendrils of the federal government...