And didn't Spike fall for that bullshit rumor about Liz Claiborne?![]()
What rumor? I missed that one.

And didn't Spike fall for that bullshit rumor about Liz Claiborne?![]()
Didn't Spike direct Jungle fever, where all the white guys are racist twats, and the only good people are black?
so according to "Spike" Lee anybody who doesn't go out of their way to include blacks in their films is a racist.
And didn't Spike fall for that bullshit rumor about Liz Claiborne?![]()
What rumor? I missed that one.![]()
There was this urban legend that Liz had made racist remarks against black people and that she didn't want them buying her clothes. It was totally fake, of course, but Spike and his ilk apparently thought it was real.
Linky
Spike is wrong. That being said...
This is irrelevant to the extent that I'm not sure you understood the post:
Didn't Spike direct Jungle fever, where all the white guys are racist twats, and the only good people are black?
And this is the most illogical thing I've seen in quite some time:
Apologies if this has been posted already:
Spike Lee slams Clint Eastwood for being racistSpike Lee has slammed legendary actor/director Clint Eastwood for failing to include black soldiers in his films Letters from Iwo Jima (2007) and Flags of Our Fathers (2006). The Inside Man director claims Eastwood should have included African-American soldiers in the films about the Battle of Iwo Jima—considering hundreds took part in the 1945 battle. Lee launched his attack on Tuesday at the Cannes Film Festival, saying, “There were many African-Americans who survived that war and who were upset at Clint of not having one (in the films). That was his version: the negro soldier did not exist. I have a different version. But I know it was pointed out to him and that he could have changed it. It’s not like he didn’t know.”
Bingo.They weren't soldiers (army) in those movies, they were marines. At that time, the Marine Corps did not use black marines in front line infantry units, which are the focus of the movies. There definitely were black marines and sailors on Iwo Jima, but they were in supporting echelons in rear areas. Those kinds of units were not shown in the movies (except at very long distance in aerial shots &c.). Spike needs to do his homework: Eastwood is not racist, but the times he was depicting were.He said that he wanted black characters (soldiers) in the movies, and for them to be recognized, not for the actors you mentioned to play the Japanese characters. And he's got a point-it's not as if he was filming the Battle Of Britain, which mostly was all-white.
I do wonder about this, though -- from the article:
What, precisely, was pointed out to Eastwood, and what is he supposed to have known, according to Lee? Surely, Lee isn't suggesting that historical accuracy be sacrificed to fit a latter-day sense of inclusion which did not exist in that time and place?Lee launched his attack... saying, “...I know it was pointed out to him and that he could have changed it. It’s not like he didn’t know.”
The "article" gives no indication.
Well, another unacknowledged thing was that there were Japanese-American/Canadian soldiers at the various landings on D-Day, but no one really bitches about that too much.
I don't think Eastwood did it out of any racist (not that Lee directly accuses him of it anyway) or malicious reasons
I don't think Eastwood did it out of any racist (not that Lee directly accuses him of it anyway) or malicious reasons
So basically the title of this thread is completely wrong?
Spike Who?
"They're telling us that deep down inside, we all want to be white!"
I'm waiting for Spike to direct his version of Apollo 13 so we can get the black experience of that historic event.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.