• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Special relationship UK & US (a myth?)

" War, alliances, NATO, history don't speak for convenience", the problem is for each and every one of those things you have (in your own words) been referring to an outside perspective.

From this end they look very different indeed, much less balanced, much more a matter of convenience and self serving with little given in return.
You seem to be really stewing over this. That is sad.
 
You seem to be really stewing over this. That is sad.

Not really to be honest, although I can see why it would appear that way. I'm just being reflective of a cultural perspective which isn't shared by many of our mutual cousins in the US.

We've been involved as a nation in enough awful shit of our own without being drawn into more we don't support. That perspective is hardly uncommon here, as I'm sure you've some experience of.
 
We’re their oldest enemies. We still haven’t forgiven them for what they did to our tea.
From my cultural perspective, my US cousins' ancestors had to live with their enemies, my ancestors had their enemies as absentee landlords. I wonder who got the better deal lolI
 
Spitting image would be amazing if it were on at this time, and such a shame it is not because politically it has a unending comedy gold mine just waiting to be mined. lol
We had Newzoids in 2015-16, but it seems not to have survived.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
And prior to being attacked?

Are you forgetting about the lend lease act?
https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/lend-lease-act

I watch a number of WW1 and WW2 videos on Youtube and it always amuses me when some german kid makes a comment about those fucking American's fake neutrality in WW1 and WW2 and how the Lusitania
deserved to be sunk.

Yep, the US skirted the rules in both wars and backhandedly supplied our allies. And I support that.
 
Are you forgetting about the lend lease act?
https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/lend-lease-act

I watch a number of WW1 and WW2 videos on Youtube and it always amuses me when some german kid makes a comment about those fucking American's fake neutrality in WW1 and WW2 and how the Lusitania
deserved to be sunk.

Yep, the US skirted the rules in both wars and backhandedly supplied our allies. And I support that.

Lend lease was comparable to putting most of our military forces on the ground illegally in Iraq and Afghanistan?
 
Interestingly, from last year J. K. Rowling (reacting to the transition from Obama to Trump) seemed to think there used to be a special relationship with Americans but with Trump now there isn't or there is a specially bad relationship, the positive and negative relationships both seeming strong (comparing them respectively to that of a lover and ex-lover).

https://twitter.com/jk_rowling/status/927525892208947202?lang=en
 
In a convenient marriage, both sides profit. I am not sure if this would apply to the GB/US-relationship.
Even after the Brexit GB will keep close ties to the EU rather than form an alliance with the US. We're less erratic (for lack of a better word; no offense meant to Americans - it's simply the best word my dictionary offers). In political and economical relationships, reliability and predictability are vital.
 
Unless the US is extremely self sufficient and not rely on trading for natural resources overseas and does not feel the need to trade with other nations I do not see how the US being more isolationist helps it economically.
Quoting from The Absent Superpower by Peter Zeihan:

"...the United States economy never really internationalized: As a percentage of GDP, the United States is the most self-sufficient economy in the world. As of 2015, only 8.25% of GDP came from merchandise exports, and over one-third of that is bound up in America's NAFTA partners. And that's with old data. With the massive reshoring and industrial manufacturing boom currently underway, many of the remaining aspects of America's foreign 'dependence' are being gutted without mercy or preamble".
 
It's one sided, from the UKs side.

The USA would've happily watched Hitler take over all over Europe if it wasn't because of Pearl Harbour. They didn't offer any help during the Falklands crisis either.
 
It's one sided, from the UKs side.

The USA would've happily watched Hitler take over all over Europe if it wasn't because of Pearl Harbour. They didn't offer any help during the Falklands crisis either.
My mind went back to the ST ENT episodes Stormfront where the Nazis invaded North America. I doubt that Hitler's Third Reich intended to stop at our side of the pond.
 
My mind went back to the ST ENT episodes Stormfront where the Nazis invaded North America. I doubt that Hitler's Third Reich intended to stop at our side of the pond.

It's because they saw Hitler as an ally against communism, they didn't want to hinder his attack on Russia. No doubt they would've gone in to pick up all the pieces in the name of good ol' Uncle Sam.

Why didn't they come in earlier if they're such special friends? We were on our knees while they still lived Hollywood lifestyles all comfortable out the way.
 
Your leaders know their wagon's hitched to a star. Like any marriage, there are problems to be worked out. But as long as the USA has nuclear-armed submarines, no country in its right mind is gonna screw with us. We're the world's cops. We're always there to save the day, when there's natural disasters and the American people are especially generous ... we always have been.

Wow, a true Yanky Patriot.

USA!!
USA!!

This is why the world hates you.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top