• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

So what are you reading, now? Part V

Status
Not open for further replies.
^ Except for Babylon 5, which had every episode planned out on index cards, one per episode, before the first season even aired. Which is not to say JMS wasn't flexible; he changed THE MAIN CHARACTER from first to second season and fixed all the stories that came after that for that to work out. But he definitely had a specific, comprehensive, and very detailed plan.

That's the myth that has propagated since the series ended, but I recall JMS's Usenet postings when the show was in production, and back then he was always quite candid about how radically he was willing to change his plans in response to changing circumstances. He had certain key points he wanted to hit, but it wasn't as precise as having every episode plotted out in advance. For one thing, he made major changes from the pilot to the series, dumping three of the originally intended regulars (Takashima, Kyle, and Lyta). For another, he didn't write the whole first or second season. At the start, the show was like any other in that it had multiple staff and freelance writers.

After all, JMS is the man whose personal motto as a writer is "No plan has ever survived an encounter with the enemy." The reason I know that saying is because I read it in The Complete Book of Scriptwriting, which JMS wrote. This is a man who knows the importance of keeping his plans loose and flexible -- who knows that trying to work out precise episode-by-episode details in advance is a waste of energy, because things are always going to change or be discovered along the way.

So the level of detail in his advance plans for B5 has been hugely exaggerated in fan mythology. Yes, he had the 5-year arc planned out, but not in scene-by-scene detail or anything like that.
 
Finished IfM earlier today. I have some minor issues with it, but overall I liked it.

Next up DTI: Watching the Clock.
 
(Edit: Responding to Christopher, two posts up) ^ Not scene by scene detail, no, but this one-index-card-per-episode thing is definitely true, he said it in a special feature on one of the Babylon 5 DVDs. There was this whole thing about how the binder full of them was in plain sight, but the cast members never knew it was there, and how they were always trying to guess his password for the files on his computer that had the same information. I don't know which special feature it was specifically, but if my memory is that specifically wrong, that's a little weird.

But as I said, this was not to say he was inflexible; I mentioned the changing of the lead character, and you mentioned several other stories that were altered as the show went on, not to mention the changes to accelerate the end of 4th season in case of cancellation.
 
Last edited:
Christopher, I wasn't implying or inferring that everything should be planned to the nth degree, but some planning is necessary if a show is going to survive. Major plot points for a season- or series-long arc is a good idea and its getting to those points that changes as the show progresses.

Blindly moving along like Heroes seemed to do with Kring stretching out what should have been really short and vice versa made the show difficult to watch. FlashForward suffered from that to some degree as well, as did Knightrider and its retooling. But as I mentioned above, regardless of how well the writers might plan anything, the network f**ks around so much, that shows don't often get a chance to build up a following, and if they do, it's too late. Star Trek TNG if it aired today would probably be canned inside of two months. DS9 might last but VOY would likely be canned too.

Sometimes the characters in shows do the same thing every week and it gets tiresome after a while. I think the same is actually true of book series too. Sometimes the writers of series end up with a stale character doing the same thing in every book, I think James Patterson, Kathy Reichs and Patricia Cornwell are good examples of this IMHO and even Jeffrey Deaver is starting to get that way.
 
If it were possible to make valid generalizations about what formula makes a show successful, then there would be a lot more successful shows out there. Bottom line, no matter what approach you take, it's a gamble. It doesn't matter whether you go in with a well-formed advance plan or just make it up as you go. Both are valid storytelling approaches and it's wrong to assume that one is intrinsically superior. Either can succeed or fail depending on the skill and ingenuity of the producers, the charisma of the cast, the vagaries of scheduling, and various other unpredictable factors.
 
I just finished "Revenant" in Seven Deadly Sins. I really enjoyed it, I thought it was good horror thriller kind of thing. I especially liked the fact that the book actually focused on civilians instead of Starfleet, we don't really get that enough in the Trek IMO. That's one of the things I like so much about Vanguard, it actually focuses on alot of civilians and SF officers who's positions we don't see very often. I also liked getting to find out what became of Nick Locarno after "The First Duty".
 
Just Finished : The Priest's Graveyard 5/5!!! (review below)
Reading: Mort (discworld novel)

The Priest's Graveyard Review:

This will be a fairly succinct review which I feel is appropriate given the nature of the The Priest's Graveyard. While I've been encouraged by the improvement in quality by some of Dekker's latest works, like The Bride Collector, the Priest's Graveyard is far and away Dekker's finest single book in a long time and perhaps for all time which is saying something considering how good both Thr3e and The Bride Collector were. While the Circle trilogy and related novels make for a more fascinating, epic story, this story makes for a very tight, intense thrill-ride with some unexpected twists along the way to really take the story to the next level.

I'm a pretty big Dekker fan and have followed him for the better part of a decade and normally with a Dekker, a book it starts out fairly strong or even brilliant and begins to stumble a bit as it approaches the finish line at times which takes away from how strong the rest of the story was. That is not the case here...in fact, quite the opposite. This one not only starts out brilliant but builds in intensity and finishes even more brilliantly which is quite a feat indeed.

In any case, all that's to say that this is an awesome story I'd recommend to literally just about anyone, especially any fan of Dexter (the series), Koontz, King or any sort of intense/action novel author.
 
I just finished reading the Voyager novel Dark Matters: Ghost Dance and I am now reading the Corps of Engineers novel Collective Hindsight that was collected in the Aftermath omnibus.
 
I finised The Brave and the Bold: Book Two today as part of my Completely Indolent Saturday Afternoon™. :D

Next on my catch-up list: Star Trek: Nemesis.

In the audio book realm, I've moved on to the third Soldier Son novel by Robin Hobb, Renegade's Magic. Overall I've been disappointed in this series, both in its structural similarity to the original Farseer Trilogy and its utter inferiority to same. :(
 
Huh, you're the second person I've heard say they didn't like Robin Hobb's other stuff after the Farseer trilogy. I asked my sister about them a few days ago, and she said she only liked the first trilogy.
 
The second Farseer trilogy - The Tawny Man - were also really good. I love a lot of the characters in that series, so it helped make up for the fact that the events are almost all negative. Neither Fitz nor the Fool get to be happy for longer that a few brief periods through the six books. But the joys are that much sweeter for all the darkness that surrounds them. And at least they exist.

But in the Soldier Son books, at least so far, Nevare's choices were taken from him when he was 15, and he has never had any control over his life since. He has a nearly unimpeachable character, but aside from a couple friends who are absent most of the time, NO ONE EVER BELIEVES IN HIM. He is constantly hounded by false accusations and assumptions and despite every effort of his to do the right thing, he always suffers for it, and everything he loves is continually torn from his grasp.

What is it with stories with no joy, no hope? I felt the same way about The Hunger Games trilogy. It was very well written, but the helpless despair that imbues the story just wears you down until you finish, exhausted and depressed.
 
Just finished Kirsten Beyer's Unworthy. Great read, now I'm all caught up for Children of the Storm! I'll have a review up on my blog in the next day or so (link in my signature). Just started reading Vanguard's Reap the Whirlwind. It's off to a great start. I've been wanting to continue with the Vanguard series for some time, I can't wait to get all caught up.
 
Joseph Wambaugh's Hollywood Station. Next up is April Blood, some nonfiction about the Pazzi conspiracy against Lorenzo de Medici, which I wanted to read after enjoying the historical titbits in Assassins Creed 2.
 
I started on the Vanguard series a few weeks ago and am now about a third of the way through 'Reap The Whirlwind'. It's ok but this whole 'let's keep the genome secret' thing is getting on my nerves 3 books in, let's get it out in the open and move on for christs sake!!!
 
I finished Bitter Fruit, the TNG story from Shards and Shadows. Since then, I've also read Sherlock Holmes - The Adventure of the Mazarin Stone and Family Matters, the IKS Gorkon/Klingon Empire story from Shards and Shadows. I'm now reading Homecoming, the New Frontier story from Shards and Shadows.
 
I finished Collective Hindsight from the Aftermath omnibus. I am now moving on to Peter David's Blind Man's Bluff!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top