That's just it. Mine is an R1 disk and yet I have had no trouble no matter what model of player I've used.
There's a difference between DVD-10s (which is what the B5 disc is) and DVD-18s. DVD-10s only have one layer on each side, and are much less prone to failure. DVD-18s have four layers, which makes them more likely to have a defect in manufacturing. (When DVD-18s were first being produced, for Terminator 2, the success rate was something like 20 or 25%.)Either you've been lucky, or I haven't. But I've heard a lot of complaints about those DVD-18's, both online and from friends.
On thing I will say though is that the DVD transfer is pretty poor. There are multiple issues with sound, I just watched a season 4 episode where the voice tracks were of audibly lower quality than the rest of the sound, they were very muffled whilst the sound effects etc were crystal clear.
There's also problems with the framing, they shot it in 16:9 for a 4:3 broadcast and then went to 16:9 for the DVD release, but they have clearly had to crop 4:3 shots to 16:9 in lots of places where the original footage had a problem for whatever reason, and the CGI is of noticeably lower quality in places because they only rendered it at 4:3 and then had to crop it for the DVD release.
There's lots of other niggling problems with the transfers too. Pretty poor job really, fortunate that the show is so good as to pretty much negate the problems.
^I honestly never noticed any of those issues.
It's possible that I just chalked up any poor DVD quality to the general poor quality of the time period in which it was filmed. I just watched it for the first time over the summer, and none of it really (visually) stands up to the test of time.
Sadly I have to agree. Aside from the proto-CGI (which was amazing and still is in the context of the time), it has that "greasy 90s TV" look about it. Fortunately the writing and the performances more than make up for it.none of it really (visually) stands up to the test of time.
That was mainly about trying to differentiate itself from the orchestral wallpaper of Trek. Fortunately, the composer changed for the series to someone who managed to differentiate himself without sucking.There were a few cheesy stuff like that guitar music used throughout, what was that about?
That was mainly about trying to differentiate itself from the orchestral wallpaper of Trek. Fortunately, the composer changed for the series to someone who managed to differentiate himself without sucking.There were a few cheesy stuff like that guitar music used throughout, what was that about?![]()
Yes--the Special Edition had to be completely rescored, and the gorilla bartender wasn't quite meant for the starring role he got.Gorilla bartender?! Guitar music?! Is this stuff that that edited out of the TNT-recut edition of The Gathering?
Of course, both Franke and Copeland are far superior to Evan Chen who managed to undo all of Franke's hard work in giving the B5 universe a synonymous tone, by completely ruining the scoring of Crusade. IMO.
For that, you have JMS to blame; he didn't want Crusade to sound the same as Babylon 5. (One can only assume he was happy enough with Chen's work on A Call to Arms, or else we would've gotten someone else for Crusade.)Of course, both Franke and Copeland are far superior to Evan Chen who managed to undo all of Franke's hard work in giving the B5 universe a synonymous tone, by completely ruining the scoring of Crusade. IMO.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.