• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

"So there's more than Voyager?"

Status
Not open for further replies.
As I enter my late 40s I'm beginning to realize that a lot of my pop culture references are going over the heads of my younger coworkers.
A couple of cases in point:
I once made a Simpsons reference to a coworker and his response was that was a cartoon his parents watched when they were teenagers.
Another instance was when a coworker said something and I ended my response by saying, 'And don't call me Shirley'.
It went completely over her head. She had never seen nor heard of the movie 'Airplane!'
I'm just going to have to get used to the sliding scale of cultural reference points.
 
As I enter my late 40s I'm beginning to realize that a lot of my pop culture references are going over the heads of my younger coworkers.
A couple of cases in point:
I once made a Simpsons reference to a coworker and his response was that was a cartoon his parents watched when they were teenagers.

I never watched it, but thought the Simpsons was still going on.

Another instance was when a coworker said something and I ended my response by saying, 'And don't call me Shirley'.
It went completely over her head. She had never seen nor heard of the movie 'Airplane!'
I'm just going to have to get used to the sliding scale of cultural reference points.

I know that quote, but I didn't know it was from the movie "Airplane!" I guess I'll have to watch that someday.

I make it a point to endow my young children with proper pop culture references. And yes, that includes "I Love Lucy" references.
 
Say whut? :vulcan:

I guess that gives me the right to go around saying that everyone who hasn't heard of my favorite authors or TV shows or movies is of below-average intelligence, hm?
No, no, please don't over-generalize from my quip about intelligence! I was responding specifically to the proposition that someone would think the Flash and Flash Gordon, or Green Hornet and Green Lantern, were interchangeable characters. Someone doesn't have to be familiar with those properties to know that they're not; you just have to understand how words work.

I still get my music on CD, and the vast majority of my book collection is in the form of physical books.
I'm still a big fan of physical media myself. But my point is that one doesn't even have to visit a physical store any more to browse the options... and it's not as if the search engine on, say, Amazon has a filter to limit results to "products younger than I am." Seems to me like it would take a proactive effort for someone to remain ignorant of older books, music, films, or TV these days.

Just yesterday a visitor to my home noticed one of the Outlander novels I'm reading (the TV series was based on them), and was horrified at how thick the books are... [and] she'd never heard of Henry VIII, and I found myself wondering how that was possible.

But it just goes to show that not everyone is into either history or historical drama.
Or reading.

(No surprise there, sadly. Only 72% of American adults report having read at least one book in the previous year. And the median number read is just four — whereas the mean number is 12, suggesting that most of the reading is being done by an even smaller share of the population.)

Intelligence aside, intellectual curiosity is definitely not distributed evenly across the population. I teach undergrads. It's a challenge I face on a regular basis...

For example, many suburban kids would be surprised to know that I never took a school bus to go to school, walking there instead. And that I remember when the crossing guards were older school children.
Are these things no longer done? If not, why not? (Honest questions! I have no kids, so I don't know...)

Not everybody knows everything and the world is full of people who skip over the ENTERTAINMENT section in their favorite newspaper or magazine or whatever. Lord knows I toss out the SPORTS and BUSINESS sections unread.
Same here (metaphorically speaking... I no longer read a physical paper). But even though I am decidedly not a sports fan, I know that a quarterback, a halfback, and a fullback are not the same thing, or what it means when a batter has And I'm not a businessman, but I can talk intelligently about the difference between equities and securities, or describe what a derivative is. For that matter I'm not religious, but I can hold my own about issues of theology, textual and historical criticism, and so on.

And when I find myself insufficiently informed about something outside my areas of immediate personal interest, well, Google and Wikipedia are just clicks away. So again, matters of raw intelligence notwithstanding, it's a lack of curiosity that really seems to be the key factor for some people.

That being said, the "Yoda" thing still amazes me since, even you've never seen one of the movies, how do miss STAR WARS as a huge pop-cultural phenomenon? There are tons of movies and TV shows and books and music that I've never sampled, but I've heard of them and know the basic idea.
Exactly. That's what I'm talking about. Seems like it would take more effort to be unaware of such things.

Another instance was when a coworker said something and I ended my response by saying, 'And don't call me Shirley'.
It went completely over her head. She had never seen nor heard of the movie 'Airplane!'
But... but... but Airplane didn't even originate that joke. It's a classic pun. It works on its own! How could she not get it?
 
1001001 said:
:lol:

It's basic math.
:rolleyes:

Please re-read my whole post. It should be obvious that I wasn't talking about math. I was talking about the notion that somebody is stupid (below average intelligence) for not knowing about the same pop culture things you (general you) know about.

I can express surprise and mind-boggledness (to coin a phrase) because somebody doesn't know who Henry VIII is (and who would therefore not begin to understand the Tudors TV series or enjoy the novels by Philippa Gregory, but that doesn't mean the person is stupid. That person may never have taken any history courses that mentioned the Tudors, or had any interest in the history of that era. Or they might not be interested in historical drama (yes, I'm aware this genre often plays fast and loose with historical details, but they're based on real historical people and events).

tharpdevenport said:
Even Webster's dictionary -- which each year removed old words not quite in use like they once were in include new ones -- put Klingon in the dictionary; even books worms would have encountered that.
Do people often pick up dictionaries to read for fun?

On other fronts, I agree that this isn't an intelligence issue. The individual who didn't know that "the Flash" and "Flash Gordon" were not the same person is, in fact, a highly-educated publishing professional who specializes in young-adult fiction. Just not a comics fan, that's all. And another story: I actually met someone not too long ago whose sole knowledge of Batman came from vague memories of the old Adam West show. ("Didn't he have a search-light on his roof or something?") And this was AFTER the nineties movies, the Christian Bale movies, etc. Again, not a dumb person, just somebody who doesn't care about movies or TV particularly.
Agreed. I'm often confronted by people on this very forum who think I'm somehow lacking in intelligence because I've never seen even one episode of Seinfeld, miss the pop culture references, and don't care.

On the Wal-Mart front, I wasn't just talking about toys. I'm talking lunchboxes, beach towels, tee-shirts, greeting cards, cereal boxes, calendars, Pez dispensers, etc. It's hard to miss. Ditto for Wonder Woman, Spider-Man, etc. That stuff has gone mainstream--unlike, say, Babylon-5 or Elfquest or whatever.
True. It's all over the place, but unless I'm into it, I just ignore it. It becomes part of the background, the same way I ignore other things I'm not interested in. As another example, I collect both books and penguins. I've got stuffed penguins, penguin pictures, and penguin figurines all over my apartment. The only person who ever noticed them right away was the plumber who came over a few days ago to fix my sink drain - because he's into penguins, too. Other people who visit immediately notice the books, but the penguins might as well be invisible.

I'm not saying I don't have Star Wars stuff. I used my babysitting money to buy the original set of 12 action figures in the late '70s, and considering I got 50 cents/hour and they cost $2.99, it took awhile. I still have most of those. My great-aunt gave me a Star Wars blanket for Christmas, and I still have that, too. But it's been a very long time since I actively sought any of it out. I think the last time I bought any action figures, it was at a garage sale when I told the person that I'd be happy to give her a couple of bucks for Lando Calrissian, but I didn't want the rest of them since I already had them, and what would I do with 6 identical Luke Skywalkers anyway? (she was selling it as a must-take-all item)

So she reasoned that it was better to make a few dollars from people who were just missing one or two figures than be stuck with everything. She sold me Lando, and he's still around here somewhere.

Timewalker: You may be amused to know that F.M. Busby was one of the featured guests at the very first science-fiction convention I ever attended, way back in the early eighties. I remember liking his stuff back in the day.
:techman:

I found him super-nice, and his wife, too. We chatted for a few minutes at the convention I met him at, and talked about his cat (the one in some of his publicity photos).

I got into the fanfic project because I wanted more of the story, and was hoping somebody might have written some. All I found was a plea on LiveJournal from someone else, wondering the same thing.

So I figured that if I wanted more, I'd have to write it myself. It's been fun, imagining what happened next to some of the characters, and filling in some of the gaps (like what happened to Voris Kerguelen, Rissa's uncle - since when she tried to find him after being freed from Total Welfare, she discovered that he'd basically been erased from ever existing). And I also wondered what ever became of the baby Tregare fathered with Erdis Blaine... some future meeting many years later would throw some sort of wrench into everything, since Tregare never told his family of that baby's existence.
 
"As of 2018 there are four TV series and ten movies."

So you're denying the existence of Final Frontier, Nemesis and Into Darkness?

He startstelling me about bingeing on Netflix

Hmm, Netflix recommends other series -- I'd expect it to recommend at least one other Trek to them.

Kids today. (born during voyager?!) *cry*


someone would think the Flash and Flash Gordon

Just don't mistake Flash Gordon and Flesh Gordon
 
I'm still a big fan of physical media myself. But my point is that one doesn't even have to visit a physical store any more to browse the options... and it's not as if the search engine on, say, Amazon has a filter to limit results to "products younger than I am." Seems to me like it would take a proactive effort for someone to remain ignorant of older books, music, films, or TV these days.
Not really. Not based upon my interactions with people 18 and younger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kor
Fair enough that you wouldn't have heard of say DS9 or Enterprise, and/or grew up with no interest in Sci-Fi in general so would never think to investigate that kinda thing. But to have never heard of the original Star Trek, Captain Kirk, Mr Spock, Beam me up Scotty, etc...
And the recent three movies, I mean they just never saw any advertising or anything whatsoever for those?
Since I resubscribed to the Space Channel, I've seen plenty of advertising for a variety of movies and TV shows. But to me, most of it is just background noise. I don't go to theatres anymore, and I got out of the habit of too much TV watching (being without cable or even a working TV for enough years will do that). The only SF I watch these days are Star Trek, The Handmaid's Tale, and Timeless.

So it's not that surprising that people with far less interest in science fiction would tune out even more of it. With some people, if there's no interest, nothing about the ad makes enough of an impression to be retained.

I've been introduced as a "STARS WARS author" more than once. Always a bit awkward:

"Hello, everyone. Today's speaker is the author of many best-selling STAR WARS novels . . . "

"STAR TREK."

"Excuse me?"

"Um, er, no big deal, but I write Trek, not Wars."

(Baffled look from librarian or English teacher who clearly doesn't know the difference.)
Well, hopefully the audience knows the difference!

I was flabbergasted when I watched a YouTube video of Neil Degrasse Tyson giving a talk to some junior high students. The location was the school auditorium, and the stage was littered with pieces of sets. The headmaster (it was a private school) apologized for the clutter and said the students were getting ready to put on Romeo and Juliet, "one of the classics of American literature."

I just about fell off my chair. I honestly do not understand how anyone, let alone a teacher, could not know that Shakespeare is not, and was not, American.

No, no, please don't over-generalize from my quip about intelligence! I was responding specifically to the proposition that someone would think the Flash and Flash Gordon, or Green Hornet and Green Lantern, were interchangeable characters. Someone doesn't have to be familiar with those properties to know that they're not; you just have to understand how words work.
Thanks for clarifying. But do keep in mind that to people who aren't into superhero comics or TV shows or movies, or aren't familiar with that genre, it all sounds like the same thing.

I've had my own conversations with people who are honestly clueless about the difference between Star Trek and Star Wars.

I'm still a big fan of physical media myself. But my point is that one doesn't even have to visit a physical store any more to browse the options... and it's not as if the search engine on, say, Amazon has a filter to limit results to "products younger than I am." Seems to me like it would take a proactive effort for someone to remain ignorant of older books, music, films, or TV these days.
All it takes is a school system where the curriculum doesn't include Shakespeare or poetry or classic novels, or parents who see no point in having books around. It's disheartening that so many of the younger generations have such a lack of regard for older literature, music, and TV/movies.

Or reading.

(No surprise there, sadly. Only 72% of American adults report having read at least one book in the previous year. And the median number read is just four — whereas the mean number is 12, suggesting that most of the reading is being done by an even smaller share of the population.)
I was very lucky that way; both my parents read, and so did my grandparents, in a wide variety of genres; my grandfather even started reading science fiction, once I started bringing SF books home. I was actively encouraged to read, and my family started teaching me when I was about 4.

There were times when I'd babysit the neighbors' kids, and once finished my homework, I'd look around for something to read. One place had a dismal choice: the newspaper (already read it), the Encyclopedia Britannica, or two fantasy novels. I wasn't into fantasy at that point, so I picked a volume of the encyclopedia at random, and started reading.

Intelligence aside, intellectual curiosity is definitely not distributed evenly across the population. I teach undergrads. It's a challenge I face on a regular basis...
I predict this will continue, as people are already used to the idea that all the wisdom on the internet is found on Wikipedia.

MAGolding said:
For example, many suburban kids would be surprised to know that I never took a school bus to go to school, walking there instead. And that I remember when the crossing guards were older school children.
Are these things no longer done? If not, why not? (Honest questions! I have no kids, so I don't know...)
I can relate to @MAGolding on this point. The only times I ever took a bus to school was when I lived on an acreage and the county school I attended was located within the nearest city, and many years later when I went to college. When I moved into the city, I was expected to walk to and from school. We got rides maybe 3 times during those years, during a really vicious cold snap in the early '70s.

Fast-forward a few decades, and I'm absolutely baffled by parents who wail and start brandishing verbal pitchforks when it turns out that their kids have to walk to a bus stop. And I've seen complaining about the "hardship" of kids having to walk a few blocks to school.

At least they didn't have to ride a horse, like my grandmother and great-uncle did. That's how life was a hundred years ago, for some rural kids in this province.
 
MAGolding said:
For example, many suburban kids would be surprised to know that I never took a school bus to go to school, walking there instead. And that I remember when the crossing guards were older school children.

Are these things no longer done? If not, why not? (Honest questions! I have no kids, so I don't know...)

I'm sure that rural kids didn't walk ten miles to school and back every day. Maybe something like five miles and back again was the limit for rural kids walking, but that's just a guess. I think that kids who lived farther away from school would ride horses or buggies and then later autos if their families had them.

But kids in cities like where I lived were driven by their parents when young and then walked. In grade school we walked to school, back for lunch, back to school, and back home, and I often walked to the public library after that. A long time later I looked at the map and was surprised to see it was only half a mile one way. In sixth grade we moved to an older inner suburb and the new house was next door to the grade school playground, and the high school was across a street from the grade school. So I never took a school bus except on field trips - I don't even remember if the second school district used buses except for field trips, though I remember many kids walking to and from school.

At the crossings near the grade school in the city there were crossing guards. There may have been adult crossing guards, but I remember the kids, members of the safety patrol. Nowdays, living in the farther suburbs or countryside, I notice only adult crossing guards when passing schools. Some sources indicate that at the present student safety patrol members assist adult crossing guards and thus would not be at crossings without crossing guards.
 
I used to watch The Simpsons in the nineties but it's been done to death so I gave up on it before the millennium! But if someone doesn't know the quote, "And don't call me Shirley!" Then something is definitely wrong with the current society! That or we have alien invasion going on right under our noses!
JB
 
I predict this will continue, as people are already used to the idea that all the wisdom on the internet is found on Wikipedia.
Hey, don't dis Wikipedia. It has standards, and it's scrupulous about citing its sources. I've read countless undergrad papers that would have been considerably better if they'd just taken the trouble to crib from Wikipedia. :sigh:

...I'm absolutely baffled by parents who wail and start brandishing verbal pitchforks when it turns out that their kids have to walk to a bus stop. And I've seen complaining about the "hardship" of kids having to walk a few blocks to school.
I walked roughly a mile to school each day, in elementary and again in high school. (The only time I rode a bus was for one year of middle school.) I also served as a crossing guard when I was all of nine years old. And I'm not exactly old. My parents are Boomers. I ask again, sincerely: do kids no longer do these things?...
 
Hey, don't dis Wikipedia. It has standards, and it's scrupulous about citing its sources. I've read countless undergrad papers that would have been considerably better if they'd just taken the trouble to crib from Wikipedia. :sigh:
Yeah, it's so scrupulous that I found a rather egregious error in a diagram of the Julio-Claudian dynasty that ruled Rome (from Augustus to Nero). No way to correct it, and who knows if it ever got fixed?
 
Yeah, it's so scrupulous that I found a rather egregious error in a diagram of the Julio-Claudian dynasty that ruled Rome (from Augustus to Nero). No way to correct it, and who knows if it ever got fixed?

Did you tell anyone?

I agree though, I've never seen any undergrad papers with an error in
 
Things fade away sometimes. I was rather startled to discover that my youngest siblings had never heard of PEYTON PLACE. It wasn't that they were only vaguely aware of it as a mildly scandalous relic of the past. The words "Peyton Place" literally meant nothing to them.

To be fair, I've never read the book or seen the movie or TV series either. But I know that it was a once-notorious novel from days gone by. But I guess it's not so notorious anymore and has gone the way of FOREVER AMBER . . .

(And how many people would get that last reference anymore?)
 
Last edited:
Did you tell anyone?

I agree though, I've never seen any undergrad papers with an error in
Yes, I reported it and asked someone (whoever was able) to fix it. I checked back a couple of months later and absolutely nothing had been done. It wouldn't surprise me to find it still unfixed.
 
The correct response is:

"As of 2018 there are four TV series and ten movies."

:devil:


Now, now, some of the TNG movies are worth watching twice. :)

Meanwhile, I admit to being a little taken aback that a twenty-something friend had never heard of THAT GIRL with Marlo Thomas, but I guess that show didn't live forever in syndication like I LOVE LUCY or THE HONEYMOONERS or whatever.

Even sadder, recently an editor flagged a throwaway reference to Emma Peel in a manuscript, arguing that a twenty-something character in 2018 would not be casually referencing an old spy show from the sixties in dialogue. He was probably right, so I changed the reference to "Miss Moneypenny."

But that stung a bit. :)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top