• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

"So there's more than Voyager?"

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's really mind-boggling to me. I can perhaps understand it when you are a kid, and everything is new. But after that?

Like I wrote, we live in a media-saturated society... darn near everything ever written/filmed/recorded is out there in some form competing for our attention, and it's easier than ever to be informed about it. These days you don't have to find a film society or a revival theater, or even stroll through a video store... you literally just have to sit at home and browse your favorite streaming service.

(And for music, or books, that level of obliviousness is even harder to fathom...)

I agree.

Kor
 
And adults who have had access to a wealth of Star Trek information online for over two decades. Was there never any curiosity? Never wanted to look something up? Never been to IMDb?


"I really love Earth."
"Me, too. What about the other planets?"
"There are other planets?"
 
Like I wrote, we live in a media-saturated society... darn near everything ever written/filmed/recorded is out there in some form competing for our attention, and it's easier than ever to be informed about it.
By the same token, that saturation makes it easier for something to get lost in the crowd and go unnoticed. As you say, it's all competing for their attention.
 
I like to think I have a good sense of perspective about this kind of thing. I don't expect the average person to have heard of, say, FARSCAPE or THE 4400, but even still I'm startled sometimes. Believe it or not, I once had neighbors who didn't know who "Yoda" or "Godzilla" were. That still boggles my mind. Even if you're not really into this stuff, there's STAR WARS merchandise all over Wal-Mart. How do you overlook STAR WARS? And Godzilla has been around for over sixty years. They never caught a Godzilla movie on TV as a kid?
Then be boggled. I've never seen Farscape or The 4400. I'm vaguely aware that Godzilla is some Japanese monster movie character, but never bothered to watch any of it. I have only a superficial knowledge of the Star Wars prequels; I tried to watch them but found them so boring that they literally put me to sleep.

It's been decades since I bought any Star Wars merchandise, so I have absolutely no idea what's available in the toy section of Walmart. My visits to Walmart are for household cleaning supplies, cat supplies, groceries, and a few other miscellaneous things that have nothing to do with toys.

Then again, I have also met people who didn't realize that the Flash and Flash Gordon were not the same thing. Ditto The Green Hornet and the Green Lantern.
Not everyone is into superhero comics. I've only heard of the Green Lantern because a friend on another forum is a fan and has a thread dedicated to his favorite comics.

Seriously, we live in a completely media-saturated society. In today's world of "peak TV," it's perhaps understandable if there's some cool new show that people haven't heard of. Or even more obscure older stuff... I was recommending the new Lost in Space to a friend over drinks the other day, and he assumed it was a remake of the 1998 movie, because he'd never heard of the 1960s TV series. But something that's been a major cultural phenomenon for over 50 years, with marketing blitzes every time some new iteration comes along? That's a whole other level of obliviousness. Being unaware of Star Trek is like being unaware of Spider-Man.
Hmm. I used to watch the old Spider-Man cartoon. I've never seen any of the movies, or follow any of the media stories about them.

I'm actually on the flip side of this regarding The Handmaid's Tale. So many of the people who watch the TV series have never read the novel, and never heard of the 1990 movie. A lot of the detractors hysterically insist it's all anti-Trump, feminist propaganda... and refuse to consider the facts that the original novel was published 33 years ago in Canada, and the first season of the TV series was already shot before the 2016 election.

I often find it useful to remind myself that half the adult population is of below-average intelligence...
Say whut? :vulcan:

I guess that gives me the right to go around saying that everyone who hasn't heard of my favorite authors or TV shows or movies is of below-average intelligence, hm?

Well, I could... but it would be pretty damned rude. Every time somebody says they haven't heard of the novels of F.M. Busby (I've been working on a long-term fanfic project based on his books, since he stopped publishing in the mid-'90s and died over 10 years ago), that gives me an opportunity to explain about them and hopefully find someone else who is willing to try them. That's more positive than saying, "You haven't heard of the Hulzein series? Gosh, you must be stupid!"

Sounds like a good opportunity or idea to invite them over for drinks or dinner and watch select episodes. At least TNG and DS9 pilots. TOS may be a bit too old school.
Why?

And you didn't mention DISCO? That's a current series.
Introducing the dregs of a franchise is hardly the way to get new fans.

There are plenty of people who are mostly unaware of the specifics of SF, and don't even know the difference between Star Trek and Star Wars. And in my experience, a lot of people are absolutely uninformed when it comes to any movies, music, or television from before the time when they were kids.
I'm reminded of a conversation on this site years ago, when someone was pontificating about how terrible and unwatchable and boring all black and white shows and movies were. Granted, it takes a bit of extra mental effort to imagine what the real colors might be, but then sometimes a colorized version comes along and you realize that it was much better in black and white. If that sounds odd, compare a black and white episode of The Adventures of Robin Hood (from the 1950s) to a colorized version. The outlaws looked absolutely ridiculous in color, and I much prefer the black and white episodes.


There are a depressing lot of people who seem to think that anything that happened before the internet age began is hopelessly primitive. It's even an education on a comics site I belong to, that's rerunning the entire Canadian comic strip For Better Or For Worse.

The strip is up to the year 1989 now, and it's been an eye-opener into the different generational attitudes between older readers and younger readers... the younger ones are dumbfounded and shocked at how much direct supervision the kids in the strip don't get all day, and a couple of posters are hysterical at the moment because one of the kids actually played in a mud puddle and got her clothes dirty ("she's gonna get sick!"), and then went home and sneaked a box of cookies ("she's gonna end up with diabetes and hypertension!").


That's really mind-boggling to me. I can perhaps understand it when you are a kid, and everything is new. But after that?

Like I wrote, we live in a media-saturated society... darn near everything ever written/filmed/recorded is out there in some form competing for our attention, and it's easier than ever to be informed about it. These days you don't have to find a film society or a revival theater, or even stroll through a video store... you literally just have to sit at home and browse your favorite streaming service.
Some of us don't have a favorite streaming service, or if we do, it's got a hell of a lot of stuff geoblocked. American Netflix users seem to take it for granted that everyone can watch what they can watch. That's not how it is.

That's not even how it is since CBS decided to lower their noses a little bit and let Canada access their streaming service. There are still popular programs we won't be allowed to see.

(And for music, or books, that level of obliviousness is even harder to fathom...)
I still get my music on CD, and the vast majority of my book collection is in the form of physical books. Just yesterday a visitor to my home noticed one of the Outlander novels I'm reading (the TV series was based on them), and was horrified at how thick the books are. She'd never heard of the TV show, and couldn't care less about 18-century history. A previous conversation revealed that she'd never heard of Henry VIII, and I found myself wondering how that was possible.

But it just goes to show that not everyone is into either history or historical drama.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kor
By the same token, that saturation makes it easier for something to get lost in the crowd and go unnoticed. As you say, it's all competing for their attention.

However, not everything is saturated into everything quite like Star Trek (and Star Wars).

To be oblivious to any Trek series but one, is to say never seen commercials, seen countless shows parodying Trek (like "Futurama, "The Simpsons", "Family Guy", old SNL skits going back decades, and plenty more old and new going back decades), trailers in theaters, posters, merchandise, various advertising campaigns, mentions of Trek conventions in the news, interviews with cast and crew, documentaries, specials, video games and much more.

How one could avoid the myriad of ways it has permeated the culture from the top to the bottom, is odd. Even Webster's dictionary -- which each year removed old words not quite in use like they once were in include new ones -- put Klingon in the dictionary; even books worms would have encountered that.
 
I am posting here because it's about all the shows.

So on Friday night we had a couple friends over for dinner. They're young. The husband is like 26 and the wife is 23. We love these people. He startstelling me about bingeing on Netflix. Aks, "So have you heard about this new show, Lost in Space?"

I'm about to reply when the wife chimes in "It's not as good as Voyager"

Interesting. These are more outdoorsy types. I wouldneverin a million years have pegged them, especially her, as a Trekkie.

"You guys like it?"

"Oh, yeah,"the husband replies "We just watched theone where the Doctor is daydreaming."

She says "I watched it all the time when I was a kid. Seven of Nine is my favorite."

I do the math. She was bornduring Voyager's original run. And she's an adult now, about to have a kid of her own. My goodness I feel old.

"I like Voyager, too," I reply, "but my favorite is Deep Space 9."

"What's that," she aske.

What the what?, I think, but I say, "Oh, it's one of the other Star Trek shows."

"Wait, there are more?" She's serious.

"Um, yeah. like the first show was in the 60s. It was just called Star Trek.Then in the 80s was The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine came in the 90s and Voyager as on not long after that."

"So am I missing the story? I started at the end?!"

"Nah. Voyager takes place along way away, so it's pretty much jsut on its own."

She's serious. She's not messing with me. And it's clear by the look on her face that this is not just pregnancy brain. She's never heard of the others, and I don't think he has, either. As a side note, they also weren't aware of the original Lost in Space. There'snothing off about them. We hae lots of stimulating discussions. They just somehow made it a quarter century lving in the United States without hearing about Star Trek, or at least not paying attention.

Now that I write this, I realize that some episodes wouldn't have made much sense. Like the appearances of Counselor Troi and Barclay. Or the occasional Romulans that show up. That would have meant nothing to them. Anything like this ever happen to you?
I used to be like that with Doctor Who. I was really surprised at the Doctors before the one I saw first.

I think it's kind of - sweet that they enjoyed the Trek they first saw. To think they can now watch all the other versions!
 
And adults who have had access to a wealth of Star Trek information online for over two decades. Was there never any curiosity? Never wanted to look something up? Never been to IMDb?


"I really love Earth."
"Me, too. What about the other planets?"
"There are other planets?"
For some people its a matter of being practical. It simply doesn't come up in their mind.
 
When I was a child I was pretty smart, I think. But I remember a lot of pop culture references that I had to ask my father about.

For example, there was a cartoon - Ruff and Ready I guess - where the heroes fought an Irish giant, "the Goon of Glocamorra", and I went and asked my father what the joke was in "the Goon of Glockamorra", and he was surprised that I never heard of "The Moon of Glocamorra".

Actually I'm not much into many aspects of popular culture - science fiction novels, movies and TV shows are a big exception.

And I am certain that many people will be surprised by how different in some ways and how similar in other ways the lifestyles of earlier generations were. And the differences between their own lifestyle and those of other economic classes or other countries.

For example, many suburban kids would be surprised to know that I never took a school bus to go to school, walking there instead. And that I remember when the crossing guards were older school children.
 
Last edited:
I used to be like that with Doctor Who. I was really surprised at the Doctors before the one I saw first.
Yeah, it's annoying when I encounter people who think the show only began in 2005. It's also annoying when people dismiss the Classic Doctors era for trivial reasons of older sets and special effects. At least I never needed a flow chart to understand any Classic Who story arc.
 
When I was a kid in the 70s Doctor Who was Jon Pertwee and when I told my classmates about the other Doctors like Patrick Troughton and William Hartnell they didn't believe me! Or they said I was crazy and needed to get out more!
But it's the same today with people having absolutely no interest in the old original series of the 60s or 70s or actually not even being aware of them which is fascinating to me!
JB
 
I discovered Firefly and SG-1 Stargate Atlantis on a JetBlue flight. Babylon 5 was introduced to me in college, at the same time.
 
@StarCruiser,
So I had researched Lost in Space some, when the new one came out. I remember watching reruns as a kid, until I got the willies from that episode where Smith and Will and the Robot find that android facory and the boy goes through it. NOT OKAY for a six-year-old.
.

Oh, god, yes. I was never a big LOST IN SPACE fan, being more into STAR TREK and THE OUTER LIMITS and BATMAN at the time. But, yes, that ep freaked me out as a kid.

On other fronts, I agree that this isn't an intelligence issue. The individual who didn't know that "the Flash" and "Flash Gordon" were not the same person is, in fact, a highly-educated publishing professional who specializes in young-adult fiction. Just not a comics fan, that's all. And another story: I actually met someone not too long ago whose sole knowledge of Batman came from vague memories of the old Adam West show. ("Didn't he have a search-light on his roof or something?") And this was AFTER the nineties movies, the Christian Bale movies, etc. Again, not a dumb person, just somebody who doesn't care about movies or TV particularly.

Not everybody knows everything and the world is full of people who skip over the ENTERTAINMENT section in their favorite newspaper or magazine or whatever. Lord knows I toss out the SPORTS and BUSINESS sections unread. (And, yes, I still read an old-fashioned newspaper every morning.)

That being said, the "Yoda" thing still amazes me since, even you've never seen one of the movies, how do miss STAR WARS as a huge pop-cultural phenomenon? There are tons of movies and TV shows and books and music that I've never sampled, but I've heard of them and know the basic idea. I know what FIFTY SHADES OF GREY is about, and DALLAS, and THE BLACKLIST and THE VOICE and Tyler Perry movies or whatever. I've never read Tom Clancy or Danielle Steele or Nicholas Sparks or Amy Tan or Patricia Cornwall, but I know who they are and what kind of books they write. Heck, I finally saw THE GODFATHER for the first time last year, and still haven't seen the sequels, but I've known who the Godfather is and understood references to it for decades now. "I'm going to make you an offer you can't refuse," etc.

In short, some stuff is more ubiquitous than others. On the Wal-Mart front, I wasn't just talking about toys. I'm talking lunchboxes, beach towels, tee-shirts, greeting cards, cereal boxes, calendars, Pez dispensers, etc. It's hard to miss. Ditto for Wonder Woman, Spider-Man, etc. That stuff has gone mainstream--unlike, say, Babylon-5 or Elfquest or whatever.

Timewalker: You may be amused to know that F.M. Busby was one of the featured guests at the very first science-fiction convention I ever attended, way back in the early eighties. I remember liking his stuff back in the day.
 
Last edited:
Fair enough that you wouldn't have heard of say DS9 or Enterprise, and/or grew up with no interest in Sci-Fi in general so would never think to investigate that kinda thing. But to have never heard of the original Star Trek, Captain Kirk, Mr Spock, Beam me up Scotty, etc...
And the recent three movies, I mean they just never saw any advertising or anything whatsoever for those?

Not bashing them btw, because I know and discover people like this all the time, not necessarily about Star Trek just about anything-just people with no basic general knowledge.
 
I've been introduced as a "STARS WARS author" more than once. Always a bit awkward:

"Hello, everyone. Today's speaker is the author of many best-selling STAR WARS novels . . . "

"STAR TREK."

"Excuse me?"

"Um, er, no big deal, but I write Trek, not Wars."

(Baffled look from librarian or English teacher who clearly doesn't know the difference.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top