• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

So the Defiant was built specifically to fight the Borg, right?

The Defiant was never ment to take out a Borg Cube by itself, as mentioned there would be several of them.

I mean, look at her size and the amount of heavy weapons she packs. You might be able to build 5 or 6 of her for every one Galaxy. Now instead of sending three Galaxy's on a Borg cube, you can now send 15-18 Defiants after it. Coming on from multiple vectors. All of them making sure phasers are modulating on mulitple frequencies.

I used to love doing that in the Birth of the Federation game. I would drag out games where I played the Federation far longer than I needed to just so I could discover heavy escort technology and build entire fleets of Defiants. There wouldn't even be any real enemies left in the game, but I'd spread them around the map on guard duty hoping some superpowerful ship would appear so they could all gang up on it.
 
I used to love doing that in the Birth of the Federation game. I would drag out games where I played the Federation far longer than I needed to just so I could discover heavy escort technology and build entire fleets of Defiants. There wouldn't even be any real enemies left in the game, but I'd spread them around the map on guard duty hoping some superpowerful ship would appear so they could all gang up on it.

I never played that game, but it always sounded fun to me!!
 
I really wonder what happpend with the special weapon designs that were proposed to fight the Borg but weren't ready during BOBW.

First Contact would have been the perfect opportunity to show them during the battle at the beginning, especially if there were a scene showing the Defiant using them against the Borg. As it was said to be designed especially as a Anti-Borg weapon.
 
Ben Sisko would disagree with you --

"...it was designed for one purpose only -- to fight and defeat the Borg."
Please don't parse. The full quote shows he is not talking specifically about the Defiant.

Five years ago, Starfleet began exploring the possibility of building a new class of starship. This ship would have no families, no science labs, no luxuries of any kind. It was designed for one purpose only, to fight and defeat the Borg. The Defiant was the prototype, the first ship in what would have been a new Federation battle fleet.
See that? A new class of starship.
 
Please don't parse. The full quote shows he is not talking specifically about the Defiant.

See that? A new class of starship.

Well, since the Defiant class of ships were being built to fight the Borg, doesn't that mean that the Defiant ship was built to fight the Borg?
 
Well, since the Defiant class of ships were being built to fight the Borg, doesn't that mean that the Defiant ship was built to fight the Borg?
Yes, but not necessarily as isolated units. The B-17 was designed to level German industry, but only in large numbers, not solitary planes.
 
The reason we didn't see the Defiant actually doing anything of real value save one puny strafing run at the Cube was simply due to budget constraints. They didn't have the dough for a better space battle and, sadly, it shows.

Yes, one can imagine that the Defiant did a lot (it's already heavily damaged when we first see it and, yeah, there are references to it attacking in the fleet audio), but, on screen, it's hard to argue that she did a whole lot on camera.

Even Ron Moore later admitted to feeling disappointed by it.
That kind of a shame that in this case, a low budget did the reverse of what it normally does. As I have heard that the borg was going to be a bug like species but do to lack of money they are cyborgs. Although maybe it is more like how it is with the Klingons how they looked very human in the tos but became more alien-like the tng.
 
How would the battle have been enhanced by showing the starships doing damage? The whole idea was that they could not - that only Picard's personal intervention could carry the day, transforming impotent starships into a precision instrument that could do damage in the one place where it mattered.

("The one place" of course should not be taken to suggest the Cube had a weak spot. We know they have none. What they have is constantly shifting weaknesses - and if Picard's Locutus persona can keep track on the shifting, then the weakness is exposed. Which is what we see happen: Locutus waits until an opportune moment, allowing many starships to die in the meantime, instead of merely pointing the guns at a specific spot.)

Showing a wounded Defiant worked pretty well here. And failing to show comparable wounds on other ships makes the Defiant look all the mightier: other ships simply die and disappear, while the tough little one gets graphic wounds and fights on.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Please don't parse. The full quote shows he is not talking specifically about the Defiant.


See that? A new class of starship.

What point are you trying to make here? Yes, everyone knows the Defiant was the first of a proposed class of ships. No one is arguing it was meant to be a solitary, one-and-done effort.

He's referring to the concept of a new ship, of which the Defiant was (at the time) the only one built. So, yeah, that's what he's talking about.

You're having an argument with yourself. Yes, Starfleet doesn't build unique ships, they build classes of ships, just as we didn't have one B-17.
 
What point are you trying to make here? Yes, everyone knows the Defiant was the first of a proposed class of ships. No one is arguing it was meant to be a solitary, one-and-done effort.

He's referring to the concept of a new ship, of which the Defiant was (at the time) the only one built. So, yeah, that's what he's talking about.

You're having an argument with yourself. Yes, Starfleet doesn't build unique ships, they build classes of ships, just as we didn't have one B-17.
Are you saying that neither the OP not the poster to whom you were responding were not talking specifically about the performance of the singular USS Defiant? Check again.
 
Are you saying that neither the OP not the poster to whom you were responding were not talking specifically about the performance of the singular USS Defiant? Check again.

Neither the OP nor the comment by The Wormhole suggest that the Defiant was every meant to be a unique starship.

In fact, the Wormhole suggests the Defiant was meant to be proof of concept for a class of warships.

Still not sure where you're getting it, but it doesn't matter. No one's disagreeing with anyone here, let's just move on.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top