Or one centred on Prince Andrew called NoncelotThe Crown spinoff that still might happened "Camelot".
Or one centred on Prince Andrew called NoncelotThe Crown spinoff that still might happened "Camelot".
That Zhao has two Oscars, two BAFTA's and two Golden Globes. And Matalas has something called an "Astra".I want you to compare Terry Matalas background, filmography and interests.
And now compare Chloe Zhao's filmography, background and interests.
What do you notice?
Bad form.You can stop wasting your time whoever is posting at me, I have blocked you because you're incapable of responding like an adult. You can apologise in PM.
Game, set and match.That Zhao has two Oscars, two BAFTA's and two Golden Globes. And Matalas has something called an "Astra".
Says who?... at a point where people's interest in quippy Whedonesque dialogue is at an all-time low.
It was very 90s that knew its pop culture very well. Translating it for the modern time would be interesting. But I don't see any reason for doing that. It's like the reboot of Charmed. Why? I'd rather see something new.It's maybe not great timing, bringing Buffy back at a point where people's interest in quippy Whedonesque dialogue is at an all-time low. They could just give this a different style, but what made Buffy stand out in the first place was its wit and the strength of the writing overall.
You don't have to watch it thenThis show ended for me before even its last season. The same thing happened with the Angel. It was good up until its last season. I don't think I need anymore. I feel like it's complete. I feel the same way about Highlander after watching the TV show. I don't really need anymore.
It's entirely possible the show won't have that, or will be a lot less than the original did.It's maybe not great timing, bringing Buffy back at a point where people's interest in quippy Whedonesque dialogue is at an all-time low. They could just give this a different style, but what made Buffy stand out in the first place was its wit and the strength of the writing overall.
It was very 90s that knew its pop culture very well. Translating it for the modern time would be interesting. But I don't see any reason for doing that. It's like the reboot of Charmed. Why? I'd rather see something new.
It's like remaking Friends. Some shows are of their time period.I tried introducing my teenagers to Buffy this past year and they didn't like it precisely because there were so many 90s references and so much dated slang they humor fell flat.
The Charmed reboot was IMO better than the original.
There've been at least three think pieces on this I've come across in the last few months. Millennial Snark is cringe to many late Gen Zers.Yeah, I shouldn't have said that like it's an objective fact. I haven't done a survey, or seen any polls.
But the impression I get from people I talk to, sites I visit, and videos I watch is that audiences are getting tired of quips, subverted expectations, bathos etc. undermining a story's sincerity and credibility after so many years of self-aware jokey superhero movies.
I find that hard to believe.The Charmed reboot was IMO better than the original.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.