I hope that's satire...
Anyway, note the original post--it immediately attacks what the OP referred to as "teabaggers" as though the tea-party protesters must be backing this sort of attack. Like I said, if this were an Islamist terror attack, we'd see people immediately pointing out that Islam does not condone this, etc., and we can't paint all Muslims with the same brush. But the OP does the same thing to the tea-party protesters and is not called on it. That's where I make the observation of a double standard.
1) Since when does bigdaddy speak for everyone? His calling card is making over-the-top statements about, well, everything. Seriously, go check out his posts in GTV&M.
2) Many of the things the guy said in his manifesto are indicative of the same misguided, aimless goals of the Tea Party movement, which basically amounts to an angry ranting of "Taxes are baaaaaaaaaaad!" without any indication of an alternative, why they are suddenly mad and protesting now as opposed to any other time in history, or how they are personally being taxed more (the vast majority of them aren't).
3) Trying to compare a fringe political movement in one country to a religion practiced by more than a billion adherents in the height of ridiculousness.
4) Nowhere did anyone say all Tea Baggers are potential terrorists or that this was a normal result of being involved in that movement. People do say that when it comes to Islamic extremism every time.
5) You would absolutely freak if anyone dared blame all of Christianity for the actions of the alleged kidnappers in Haiti or those who murder abortion doctors, yet here you are essentially saying the opposite is okay in the case of Islamic extremism by bringing it up in a completely unrelated and unfair comparison.
6) You're way too damned offended by everything and frequently make assumptions about what people are thinking.
There, does that cover all the bases, or is there anything else?