Lastly, allow the States to set up thier own citizenship requirements and take it out of the hands of the Feds.
No. Hell no. We don't operate under the Articles of Confederation and states have no authority over what is by all rights a federal matter.
Beyond that, I see no evidence that states would handle things any better than the feds do. In fact, giving states jurisdiction over citizenship be an utter, unworkable disaster. Should I worry about whether or not Arizona thinks I'm a citizen? If I cross state borders do I have to worry about arrest and deportation? What if I want to move? Huge. Mess.
Come on STR. this is your bread and butter, where are ya?
I wrote the equivalent of a 3 page essay in the other thread. You want more? Paypal me some money like any other writer-on-demand.
KJbushway said:
I do know that its BS that the wealthy can't pay just 4% more tax than they are today. Even if makes small buisness pay a little bit more, the boss doesn't have to buy a golden toilet.
The problem isn't the tax rate, but tax loopholes. That was one of the highlights of the Simpson-Bowles Deficit Commission. We could reduce corporate rates AND personal rates and still bring in more income by removing asinine little exceptions that were intended for the middle class, but were taken to ridiculous extents by the wealthy.
Having said all that, the US really has unnecessarily abused that ability to borrow, and its longer-term interests would be well-served by a reduction. It has a LOT more time to play with than any other country would have with its debt/GDP level, but short-termist politicians have kept postponing the necessary budget reductions for 20+ years. Each year that passes makes the decisions harder. If the US was wise, it would use its long range ability to manage high deficits constructively, to gradually reduce them with little real impact, while it still can. In 20-30 years time, it will be too late, and more drastic measures will be required.
This.