• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Shyamalan Mulls Unbreakable Sequel

PKerr

Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
"M. Night Shyamalan said he is considering working on a sequel to his hit Unbreakable, a superhero tale about a man (Bruce Willis) who finds that he is impervious to harm and is called to become a savior.

"I'm a strange creature," the writer/director said in a conference call with reporters last week. "When Unbreakable came out, I was like, 'God, man, I'm so excited.' I thought [it] was like comic books. No one has really done comic books like this: reality-based comic books. I really think this is a metaphor for things that people can go crazy over."

Though the film was eventually a hit, the initial reaction was mixed. "When the reaction was mixed, kind of a disappointment, I was pettily hurt, and I was like, 'God, I took so many incredible risks' and things like that," Shyamalan said.

Because of that, Shyamalan's excitement about a sequel to the movie was muted. "I felt really hurt, and I couldn't bring myself to write," he said. "It's literally like a relationship I have with the audience. ... And then, over the years, as it just grew and grew and grew, and people were like, 'You know, I really like that. That's actually my favorite movie, and I watch that all the time,' and on and on. I'll be on the street, and some kid will run across traffic with it in his backpack--he just is carrying it in his backpack--and he'll be running [saying], 'I can't believe it's you!' Will you sign my Unbreakable DVD?' And quoting the thing and all that stuff."

As a result, Shyamalan said that the sequel idea now haunts him. "How bizarre," he said. "I want to write it right now, but I want to write it for the right reasons. I want a story to pop into my head that is organic and expressive of who I am. You know, these are all kind of journals of where I am emotionally, so it's kind of hard. I'm kind of trying to go back to the journal that existed in 1999 for me. But I know me: As soon as I give up on it is when the idea will come to me. It's just I need to go into therapy; I guess that's the end of that answer to this." "



http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.php?category=0&id=61082

My question is this...

Why is anyone in Hollywood giving this guy the time of day?
 
I'm wondering why he thinks he's getting more popular with every new movie he makes. Um...sorry, but no.
 
I'd say that Unbreakable is my favourite of his movies. I liked it, the Sixth Sense and The Village a lot. He may be a bit up his own rectum, but he's a talented and distinctive writer and director. Count me interested in a sequel, assuming Willis is in it.
 
The Happening made $163 million worldwide on a $48 million dollar budget before DVD, I'd say that's pretty profitable. It was an intriguing movie as well, I quite enjoyed it.

The Last Airbender is also likely to do pretty well.

EDIT: The Village made $256 million worldwide on a $60 million dollar budget. It's not like he's an unprofitable director.
 
I love his movies. I'd probably say he's my favorite director right now. I know that when I go his movies I will always have a great time and usually be left with something to think about. I actually just saw Unbreakable for the first time a week ago and wondered why a sequel hadn't been made yet. It's the perfect type of movie for that.
 
I love Unbreakable. Personally, I feel there shouldn't be a sequel. Or, at least, there's no need.
One of the beautiful things about that movie IMHO was that we got a hint of what this superhero is like, and that's it. Leave the rest up to imagination.
On the other hand, I don't mind a sequel, let alone if it's good.
 
I loved Unbreakable. It's the only film of Shamylan's I've liked (including The Sixth Sense). That said, I'm not sure I want to see part two. Seems gratuitous.
 
I liked Sixth Sense, Unbreakable and Signs, but hated The Village and haven't watched the next two films because if they really are worse than The Village, I don't want to watch them.

That being said, I do like his style of directing, which takes its time to show and tell the story instead of being an MTV music video with quick cuts every two seconds and a camera that never stops. On the other hand, maybe he needs to stop writing his own movies and just direct for a while, or vice versa. He seems to have reached a George Lucas level of power where he has the first and last say on everything and there's no means to check and balance when he's got it wrong. While that power can be wonderful in a profession where there's too many cooks in the kitchen (aka studio interference), the process is still a collaborative effort.
 
What Shyamalan really needs to do is stop writing. He's a hell of a director. His cinematography is top notch. But his scripts have gone way downhill. He needs to take a break from writing and just direct some quality scripts by other people. Maybe after a long enough break, he might build up enough excess quality to author another gem like his first 2.5 movies.
 
All Shyamalamadingdong needs to know is how to say this phrase,


"Thank you - come again!"
 
"The Sixth Sense" was lacking, and not because Andy Richter gave away the ending on "Conan O'Brian".

"Unbreakable" I love, and was very happy to find it as a gift one Christmas (too bad I don't own a TV anymore!)

"Signs" has to be one of the best films I have seen.

"The Village" was okay, but not as good as the last two. Not something I'd pay to see again -- even a video rental, but if it were on TV for free, especially around Halloween, I might see it if nothing better were on.

"The Lady in the Water" was unforgivably bad, even insulting.

I've had enough of a feel for his movies, so after reading some reviews, I knew enough to gage what "The Happening" was like and realized it was an inbetween of TV and LitW, which is NOT a good thing.

I remember reading Shyamalan wanted to do three "Unbreakable" movies, and they actors were even signed for three films (incase), so I encourage anymore more sequels of this if he has good ideas. I don't want some shitty sequel that just retreads the ground the first one walked on.

He's been making some crappy movies lately, and as he's signed to do three Airbender films (as I recall they are shooting back-to-back?), so that'll tie him up to about 2012, so we'll be free from anymore original movies by him for at least another six years (giving time to write and bring another to filmable life).

The only good thing -- and I mean the ONLY good thing coming out of his films right now are the James Newton Howard scores.
 
I love his movies. I'd probably say he's my favorite director right now. I know that when I go his movies I will always have a great time and usually be left with something to think about.
Yeah, that's how I feel about him, too. Shyamalan, Fincher, Nolan, Aronofsky, Lynch, Copolla – these are the great directors of our time. They all seem to have a unique vision.
 
I can't stand this guy. What a goddamn windbag.

I was never overly fond of The Sixth Sense, but I thought Signs was fairly decent. At least, the last 10 minutes were entertaining. Unbreakable, The Village and - God save us - The Lady in the Water were terrible beyond all belief.

I saw The Happening last week, and that too was a steaming pile of garbage. I'd say it was even worse than The Lady in the Water, which shouldn't be possible.

Seriously, this guy is worse than Uwe Boll. At least Boll doesn't think he's good and doesn't wrap his films up as pretentious AAA blockbusters. :lol:
 
Seriously, this guy is worse than Uwe Boll. At least Boll doesn't think he's good and doesn't wrap his films up as pretentious AAA blockbusters. :lol:

Actually, Uwe Boll does think he's great, to the point where he believes other video game movie directors stole from him.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top