(I was being serious. I never, ever use it myself. I thought it had become vestigial, like the ampersand.)
The ampersand is also widely used in programming languages.
"#" is called a "pound sign" or sometmes "hash." But more often I see it called "pound."
£ = pound sign
# = hash
Your confusion is due to the bygone days of computing.
Computer text was originally encoded in ASCII, which was one byte per character.
European keyboards had £ on shift-3, while American keyboards had # on shift-3. But in both locales, shift-3 encoded to the same ASCII code (hex-23).
What this meant was that when Americans read British documents, hex-23 appeared to them as a hash symbol, even though it was typed as pound sign in Britain. The Americans learned to call # a pound sign because that was how it was being used, even though it's completely wrong to call it that.
But the mouse-over says "Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)", and the interpretation I stated conforms with what is described in the wiki link I gave.On TrekBBS, isn't the smileyintended to serve the purpose of indicating sarcasm?
I don't think so. In my experience, it's usually used to indicate frustration, exasperation, and contempt. Like rolled eyes in real life.
Ah yes, I was waiting for you to get to this point, which is discussed here. Besides enumerating disagreement on the precise meaning of either term, it says this interesting thing:In addition, there's a difference between sarcasm and irony, which none of those marks recognize.
Recently there was a thread on "OMG" in [sic] Webster's, but it was really about "OMG" in the OED. In due course, it became apparent that the term "acronym" has come to mean, in common modern usage, any abbreviation whatsoever. I objected to that on the grounds that meaning was being lost in language. Unfortunately, it really looks like the ship has sailed on the word acronym meaning an abbreviation pronounceable as a word, in and of itself.Most instances of verbal irony are labeled by research subjects as sarcastic, suggesting that the term sarcasm is more widely used than its technical definition suggests it should be (Bryant & Fox Tree, 2002; Gibbs, 2000).
But the mouse-over says "Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)", and the interpretation I stated conforms with what is described in the wiki link I gave.
btw, thanks for the great thread^I'm not sure that's true either. In spoken speech, irony and sarcasm are often indicated by tone of voice and facial expression. That's one reason why they can be difficult to spot in written form. And tone of voice is just the sort of thing that punctuation is supposed to help convey.
I concur with your outrage, and I'm starting to think we have a very similar sense of humour![]()
Btw. looking around wikipedia I just found my new favourite punctuation mark, the interrobang. Not only is it awesomely named, but also really useful - am I right or am I right‽
^I'm not sure that's true either. In spoken speech, irony and sarcasm are often indicated by tone of voice and facial expression. That's one reason why they can be difficult to spot in written form. And tone of voice is just the sort of thing that punctuation is supposed to help convey.
Btw. looking around wikipedia I just found my new favourite punctuation mark, the interrobang. Not only is it awesomely named, but also really useful - am I right or am I right‽
You are right.![]()
But I still have a love for my 'tilde', even if I use it incorrectly ~ I'm just a punctuation Maverick
I'm loving the interrobang though RW and when I follow Jadzia's instructions I will start using new and more exciting punctuation marks![]()
Interesting to see a sort-of consensus emerging re: use of irony...
Interesting to see a sort-of consensus emerging re: use of irony...
Yes. It suggests to me that irony, like humour, is primarily a form of aggression. That never occurred to me before.
Interesting to see a sort-of consensus emerging re: use of irony...
Yes. It suggests to me that irony, like humour, is primarily a form of aggression. That never occurred to me before.
Really? *sad* I view quite the opposite. Sarcasm is aggressive and lazy; irony is gentle and playful, reliant on shared commonalities of wit and artistic/cultural/literary references. The worse thing I think one can say of irony is that it could be considered cultural snobbery.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.