• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

should oral sex be depicted in star trek: discovery? hear me out

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just like in real life, I don't find anything inherently wrong with oral sex, assuming both parties are consenting adults and in agreement. However, just as in real life, I have no desire to watch two other people taking part, so no.
 
We have plenty of oral hygiene in Discovery. I would say in fact we have more oral hygiene in Discovery than any other Star Trek show. Now we know Hoshi Sato had a sonic toothbrush, but Stamets and Culber's toothbrush technology is over a century more advanced. Can't we just stick with that?
 
No. Star Trek is not pornography. Let's try and keep it that way shall we?
5m2Nh7n.gif
 
I'm not convinced we didn't already witness this in episode 4.

tumblr_oxkicvoQEq1vc1gbwo10_r1_540.gif

tumblr_oxkicvoQEq1vc1gbwo3_r1_540.gif
 
we all know that this show is much edgier than past trek shows. its not afraid to push a few more buttons and take more risks than any trek before it, as we have seen this far.

sex happens in star trek a lot. hell, in TNG we even saw beverly crusher orgasm in that one episode with the ghost (who turned out to be just an alien)! and of course in ENT we saw t'pol's buttcrack, so there was a bit of nudity there.

if it was done tastefully, and not gratuitously, would you mind if oral sex was depicted between two individuals in this show?
I like sex. I like sex on TV if/when it suits a storyline (or I'm in the mood for porn ;)) - but suddenly because Star Trek has a TV MA rating and is streaming, you want them to perform (or imply they're performing certain sex acts?

No, just no.
 
I'll be serious to say this: There's very little interesting shows one can watch with their kids without those cringeworthy moments. I can accept characters have sex and have various ways they might do that. I also get they probably have some new sonic method in or transporter technology that is better than a commode and Charmin. I don't need all the details.

If they make Trek too adult they'll never get a new fan base at an early age. I was watching reruns in the 70's before 1st grade, and actually remember a few of them. Hooked for life. Don't ruin it for everyone just for realism.
 
No. Star Trek is not pornography. Let's try and keep it that way shall we?

...But everybody else is doing it...

Just like in real life, I don't find anything inherently wrong with oral sex, assuming both parties are consenting adults and in agreement. However, just as in real life, I have no desire to watch two other people taking part, so no.

Consenting and informed, noting how many people who have a STD (no pun meant) never bother to tell their lovers about it regardless of the percentages no matter how small.

I've seen a lot of shows where they show actual sex acts (soft porn, basically). What's so special about or what's the point of that? Sens8 showed porny stuff, maybe moire than what was needed to get the point across that the linked telepaths are now going all ADHDTVSquirrelNuts over two of them being inconsiderate enough while knowing their comrades are in life or death situations at the same time, if that's what's supposed to be deemed "funny" nowadays... And just seeing 3 people go into a room together is sufficient, the audience isn't that stupid to not be able to figure it out so they have to show it as graphically as possible. Well, these days I'm no longer sure... I do miss the days of suggestive content, it gets under the radar much easier. Ask Deela and Kirk, when she was combing her already perfect and ungreasy hair, he was putting his go-go boots back on. So either they were knocking boots (oh, micro-abrasions would pretty much be the end of Kirk at that point) or playing dressing up mannequins that Kirk had taken from the Rec Deck's theater last seen in "The Conscience of the King", or whatever...

Pushing buttons is one thing, common sense, or basic human decency is arguably another. They should try merging the two, pun intended. :D

It wasn't all that great when Beverly faked it on screen in 1993 either, that or the actual story didn't make anything noteworthy - just shock jock antics with no real point... unless the ghost was using sex to lure her into its taking over her body in a more permanent sort of way but it's not exactly one of TNG's finest hours regardless if the sweeps week scene is in there or not...
 
the problem with the idea is the scope of the show isn't exploring sexual relationships. Even if it were exploring romantic relationships...

A well written show or episode writes to the point it is trying to depict or make. Sex itself isn't even necessarily important to romance, I have a hard time thinking of a point to it being used as a part of the story telling in this show.
 
Well considering two gay people engaged in oral sex are likely enjoying themselves to orgasmic levels, I'd have to agree.

What, only their pleasure and not their partner's? One day I need to do a polling during Pride...

I'll be serious to say this: There's very little interesting shows one can watch with their kids without those cringeworthy moments. I can accept characters have sex and have various ways they might do that. I also get they probably have some new sonic method in or transporter technology that is better than a commode and Charmin. I don't need all the details.

If they make Trek too adult they'll never get a new fan base at an early age. I was watching reruns in the 70's before 1st grade, and actually remember a few of them. Hooked for life. Don't ruin it for everyone just for realism.

Kids don't matter anymore. Except it's kids that become the fans who then make the new eras... just how deprived and/or depraved were yesterday's kids to force the issue down everybody's throats? (dang, didn't even realize that one until re-reading the whole message before posting...)

TOS, as I mentioned above, implied it often enough and even the infamous boots scene, it all still flies over kids' heads. But showing it outright when they're not physically, mentally, or emotionally mature to understand? Ask (most) survivors of pedophilia and convince them how making a sexually open society will fix more harm than what will be created. Society decided, via the course of evolution, to make some things taboo. Never mind if a STD is transmitted, especially herpes or HIV but at least herpes is as benign as chicken pox and shingles and up to 80% of the adult population has it and half of them genuinely don't know it. Rightly or wrongly, but back in the day there were no medications for bacteria or virii (that would adapt to them to make drug-resistant versions anyway, Darwin figured this stuff more than a century ago yet today's people seem to have slid backwards on the evolutionary slide.)

If ST-D wants to be a real mature show, let's see more depth into their stories. The instruction manual is beyond trite due to its ubiquitousness online. The intelligence is still missing from television. Or maybe there's a scene that has some thought put to it, I did miss the episode in question.
 
Last edited:
.. seeing head bobbing goes a step or two further and makes it less appropriate,

You mean like this? This is an actual Korean commercial I believe:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top