• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Ships Should Be Indestructable

Cary L Brown:
Zero point energy fields - "there is absolutely zero (pun intended) evidence that any such thing even exists"

Google "Casimir effect" or "Lamb shift"
And, from a theoretical pov, ZPE is predicted/needed by QED - the most accurate theory ever created by man.

Here's an article (complete with sources) about ZPE:
http://users.erols.com/iri/ZPEpaper.html

ZPE IS hard science.

About the self replicating mines ang ZPE in star trek:
"Conventional (for Star Trek) energy sources can't explain the mines' properties - they would break the law of conservation of energy.

And the mines need a LOT of energy - cloacking, recycling materials from destroyed mines, self-replicating (and the new mines must be able to explode) - I doubt the energy from the Denorius Belt would be suficcient.

The only explanation would be that they're using zero point energy. As to how the Federation aqcuired ZPE:

Quantum torpedos were quite widespread in later star trek. In a DS9 episode, Quark mentioned that they were availabe on the market if the price was right. And these torpedos were said to use zero point energy in DS9 TM.

About ZPE generators - several times during star trek, we had no ideea what technology an alien power source used - just that it was better than M/AM. The borg would be the first example that comes to mind.

My personal speculation would be that the borg showed tha Alpha quadrant that ZPE actually works. Afterwards, the feds (and not only) tried to recreate the technoloy. Quantum torpedos were the first result. Generators that could extraxt energy from the void - ineffectively, but still well enough to power the mines - followed.
The cardassians had their own "little" science project. They built a "subspace generator" aka "ZPE generator" that powered their defenses around Chin'toka. This generator compensated for the ineffectiveness of the process with its size. The results were spectacular. Those impenetrable shields around the weapon platforms and their overpowered weapons - we've only seen that in one main star trek species before: the borg (if you discount several ascended beings).

ZPE is not widely used because the tech is - and will remain for some time - ineffective (it's newly discovered, not mature, like the borg variant). You'll need a gigantic generator to extract large quantities of energy from vacuum - too big to fit on starships or anything else. In other words, a small (more or less) ZPE generator can't power a starship, M/AM reactors produce much more energy."

About star trek scanners/computers - they are able to scan a planet in seconds! Something that powerful will have no problem scanning one (unlike SETI) solar system (far from infinity) - and they had thousands of years to do it.
 
Last edited:
newtype alpha:
"Face of the enemy"; "The search" - both situations can be explained in a much better way that claiming something ridiculous like - no one will see (via sensors) a huge powerful magnetic field.
Electrostatic fields - i claimed the sensors can see them, not the human eye (that's your affirmation)!

I told you before - you can keep your "lord of the rings" version of the trekverse.
You want to contradict everything we know about physics (like you explicitly did with relativity in the "space warp" thread) and common sense just so that your ideea is proven feasible? You're free to do so. Just don't expect to be taken seriously.

You know what? We'll have to agreee to disagree on this issue.
 
Last edited:
newtype alpha:
"Face of the enemy"; "The search" - both situations can be explained in a much better way that claiming something ridiculous like - no one will see (via sensors) a huge powerful magnetic field.
Yes. Both were explained by the presence of a cloaking device.

The mines have a cloaking device. Sauce for the goose.

Electrostatic fields - i claimed the sensors can see them, not the human eye (that's your affirmation)!
Then you misspoke.

I told you before - you can keep your "lord of the rings" version of the trekverse.
I was not aware that characters in lord of the rings were capable of traveling faster than light.:vulcan:

You want to contradict everything we know about physics
First of all, by no stretch of imagination could "zero point energy" be described as "everything we know about physics." Quite the opposite in fact, we know next to nothing about it and most of what we (well, actually, YOU) know about it is entirely made up.

Second of all, Star Trek is notorious for making up new science concepts by stringing exotic-sounding but otherwise meaningless phrases together (Voyager being the worst culprit by far) and doesn't seem to be all that concerned with real physics anyway.

Third of all, unless you can find me an on-screen example, it remains a fact that relativistic time dilation is not canon.
 
Cary L Brown:
Zero point energy fields - "there is absolutely zero (pun intended) evidence that any such thing even exists"

Google "Casimir effect" or "Lamb shift"
And, from a theoretical pov, ZPE is predicted/needed by QED - the most accurate theory ever created by man.

Here's an article (complete with sources) about ZPE:
http://users.erols.com/iri/ZPEpaper.html

ZPE IS hard science.
No.

Dr. Valone may say it is. Then again, there are lot of other people who will explain, in excruciating detail, why the earth really is flat, too.

"Hard science" doesn't mean "someone with a plaque on wall says it's so."

"Hard science" means "proven with repeatable, reliable, and peer-reviewable experimental evidence."

There are those who claim that the so-called "Casimir effect" proves this. It does not such thing. All it proves is that the "Casimir effect" is observed. There is no... NO... conclusive evidence that there is any relationship between the two. It's SPECULATION, nothing more or less.

Regardless of how many books Dr. Valone wants you to buy. ;)

Matt Viser can say something like "there can be no doubt that it's real," but Tom Cruise can then say that "There can be no doubt that Xeno flew to Earth on an intergalactic DC-9."

There is a great deal of doubt about this. And no proof whatsoever.

Read BOTH SIDES of the debate, not just the "fanboy" side.
About the self replicating mines ang ZPE in star trek:
"Conventional (for Star Trek) energy sources can't explain the mines' properties - they would break the law of conservation of energy.
No, they don't. The only way that this is the case is if there is no external energy souce.

"ZPE" could be that external energy source. So could "tapping into the output from the belt," or "tapping into the power from the wormhole."

None of those three solutions is more, or less, plausible than the other. Except that "controllable ZPE" is inconsistent with every other element of "Treknology" which we see.

"Controllable ZPE" would be such a massive "context-shifting" thing that everything we see and know about the Trek universe would be changed.

Wouldn't you expect to see ship's power systems converted to this... making them effectively infinitely powerful and infinitely-ranged... before you'd see Rom manage to invent something like this?

One slightly goofy Ferengi bartender invents something, in a matter of hours, which the rest of the galaxy's scientists and engineers hadn't come up with yet?

That, to me, seems highly implausible... going beyond my ability to suspecd my sense of disbelief.

However... if (after studying the wormhole for a number of years, in extensive detail) they'd learned how to "piggyback" the wormhole to allow it to provide power to nearby devices (something which IS far more plausible, I think... since at DS9, they're at the one place in the universe where they can really study this particular wormhole - which is UNIQUE, remember - and learn its secrets.

This also sidesteps a MASSIVE issue with the entire concept of "ZPE-powered self-replicating mines," which was brought up earlier in this thread.

Remember... if the mines rely on the wormhole as their source of power, they aren't at risk of having a minor malfunction which would result in them spreading throughout the entire universe, wiping out everything. If they were, in fact, "ZPE-powered"... wouldn't that be a bit of a concern?

Would YOU implement a "self-replicating" device... think of them as bacterium... with a limitless power source... think of it as an infinite food supply... and no 100% reliable means of killing of the infection if it mutates?

What if a single bit gets flipped during replication... just once... and the mines are no longer able to be controlled? And they just keep replicating and replicating, and replicating... infinitely.

What happens then?

No... from an in-universe standpoint, having these be "ZPE" devices would be a horrible idea, making the "Doomsday machine" pale by comparison.
And the mines need a LOT of energy - cloacking, recycling materials from destroyed mines, self-replicating (and the new mines must be able to explode) - I doubt the energy from the Denorius Belt would be suficcient.
Replicators in the Trek universe do not create matter from energy. They convert matter from one form into another. This is "canon," by every on-screen and every "semi-official published" reference.

A "self-replicating minefield" without an EXTERNAL MATTER SOURCE would be useless. You might refer to it as a "self-recycling minefield" but even then, I'm sure that some mass would be lost with every explosion, so you'd start with 100 mines, and within a few "engagements" be permanently down to, say, 90 mines, due to lost mass.

For this concept to work, you need the following:

1) A source of energy which is consistent with the universe as presented.
2) A source of matter to use as raw material to manufacture new devices (and NOT merely "recycling").
3) A 100% reliable means of controlling the devices, and preventing them from being "the bacterial infection which wipes out the galaxy."

For #1, ZPE fails, only because it's not consistent with the universe as presented. No Federation Starships are using ZPE power systems, are they?

The only (POSSIBLE) place where ZPE is in use in the Federation is as a warhead (and even that's not something which has been formally established). This infers that ZPE, while perhaps DISCOVERED by this point, is not yet something which is able to be controlled.

For #2, ZPE (and your "recycling" idea) fail, because you require a ready source of mass. And we know the maximum range for TNG-era transporters... and have to assume that the ability to harvest matter by these mines is even more restrictive (due to simple matters of device scale!). The only plausible source would be "ejecta from the wormhole." And we see plenty of visual evidence to support the idea that there may be some form of matter present in there, as well as a great deal of energy in there.

For #3... having the devices tied to the wormhole, for power and for mass, handles that quite nicely. Much as a bacterial colony will grown in the sugar on the bottom of a petri dish yet not on the walls.
The only explanation would be that they're using zero point energy.
NO.

Not "the only explanation." There are many other possible explanations. One of which has been provided, and reiterated above. You are simply so infatuated with this idea that you're rejecting the other as "impossible" out of hand.

You could make the argument that "I think ZPE is the best explanation." But your statement that it is "the only explanation," is patently false. Obviously.

ZPE also has problems... albeit problems you have systematically avoided considering, it seems, as to do so would compromise your own argument. And ZPE is little more than "speculative fiction" at this point, with NO PROOF BEHIND IT WHATSOEVER. It's just a very cool "what if" idea.
As to how the Federation aqcuired ZPE:

Quantum torpedos were quite widespread in later star trek. In a DS9 episode, Quark mentioned that they were availabe on the market if the price was right. And these torpedos were said to use zero point energy in DS9 TM.

About ZPE generators - several times during star trek, we had no ideea what technology an alien power source used - just that it was better than M/AM. The borg would be the first example that comes to mind.
And, in-universe, this is entirely possible.

Maybe you failed to read the point I raised about these being, in-universe, something like fusion is today... something we can tap into, but not yet control?

That's why we have hydrogen bombs, but no fusion powerplants, today. We know how to tap it, but not control it.

That also fits with TNG-era Treknology... "quantum torpedos" can be ZPE "warheads" because a "warhead" doesn't involve the ability to CONTROL the output energy.

As for "quantum torpedos" using ZPE, I am fine with that, and the DS9 TM says it, sure... but it also says many things which are inconsistent even with itself and with stuff seen on-screen. It's a great resource, but not 100% conclusive. I accept that they're ZPE devices, but we don't "know" that they are.

(Actually... all they REALLY are is "fictional buzzwords intended to sound more advanced than 'photon torpedoes,'" after all!)
My personal speculation would be that the borg showed tha Alpha quadrant that ZPE actually works. Afterwards, the feds (and not only) tried to recreate the technoloy. Quantum torpedos were the first result. Generators that could extraxt energy from the void - ineffectively, but still well enough to power the mines - followed.
Okay, then, riddle me this: If they have ZPE devices which are inefficient and unreliable... which is how I'm interpreting your use of "ineffective" here (since they'd need to be at least PARTLY effective, wouldn't they?)... and since it's been argued that "Trek sensors can detect all energy immediately"... why were the mines invisible to all sensors?

A passive device is far easier to hide than a messy, noisy, inefficient one. A solar-powered cell phone tower, for instance... compared to one powered by a diesel generator. Which is more reliable? Which requires more, or less, maintenance? Which is easier to hide?

(Oh, and by the way... Dominion, and Federation, sensors, at this time, are incapable of detecting the mines, right? So... does that mean that the cloaking fields could not be detected, themselves, by some new form of sensor and a sensor-processing algorithm which knows what to look for?)

One last point about the "emissions from the wormhole." While, in the beginning, they merely "stumble onto" the wormhole... pretty quickly, our heroes learn how to detect the location of the wormhole with sensors, even when it's "closed." They don't have to stumble around looking for it... they just fly right into it... even when it's "closed."

How, exactly, does that work if there's no way to see it? Space is, after all... very, very big. Something you can't see is very hard to find.

Seems to me that this, by itself, infers that the wormhole mouth, even when "closed," is still giving some form of "energy signature"... maybe emitting some small amount of mass ejecta... there's gotta be SOMETHING that they can see, once they know what to look for.

Doesn't there?
The cardassians had their own "little" science project. They built a "subspace generator" aka "ZPE generator" that powered their defenses around Chin'toka.
Maybe I'm missing something here... but where, in the show, was the term "ZPE generator" used to refer to that defensive system?

It looks, to me, like you're making that up. There is NO reason to conclude that a "subspace generator" is in any fashion related to a "ZPE power source," unless that is EXPLICITLY STATED ON-SCREEN.

Was it stated as such? Or is this you, "inferring" something you want to believe, with no supporting evidence?
This generator compensated for the ineffectiveness of the process with its size.
Can you support that, or is that your own personal fiction?
The results were spectacular. Those impenetrable shields around the weapon platforms and their overpowered weapons - we've only seen that in one main star trek species before: the borg (if you discount several ascended beings).
All we know is that these platforms were big and powerful and hard to kill. That was the point of those lines in the script. There is not one shred of on-screen evidence to support that "this big and powerful thing" and "that big and powerful thing" are in any way related, other than being "big and powerful."

It's more likely, honestly, that the power sources used in these platforms were based upon something given to them by the Founders. There is very minimal evidence of contact between Cardassians and Borg (that evidence consisting of one, and only one, Borgified Cardassian seen in the background in "First Contact").
ZPE is not widely used because the tech is - and will remain for some time - ineffective (it's newly discovered, not mature, like the borg variant).
Pure fantasy. There is no on-screen evidence to support this. (Yes, all trek is "fantasy" but we're talking about (1) real science, and (2) on-screen evidence. Neither support this conclusion.)
You'll need a gigantic generator to extract large quantities of energy from vacuum - too big to fit on starships or anything else. In other words, a small (more or less) ZPE generator can't power a starship, M/AM reactors produce much more energy."
Again.. prove that statement with respect to anything either seen on-screen or in real science as we know it today.

Further... relate that to the TINY mines (remember, we see a full-scale model on the station once!) and to the size of quantum torpedoes. Your comments are neither supported by "real science" (which says NOTHING, EITHER WAY) or by on-screen evidence (which says very much the opposite of the point you're trying to make).
About star trek scanners/computers - they are able to scan a planet in seconds! Something that powerful will have no problem scanning one (unlike SETI) solar system (far from infinity) - and they had thousands of years to do it.
"Able to scan a planet in seconds?"

Hmmm... you keep repeating that nonsense, even though you've have example after example provided to you demonstrating how on-screen evidence directly contradicts your claim. Evidence from every single series, including DS9.

You say "able to scan an entire planet in seconds." Fine... how come, then, they were not able to see the Jem Hadar, or Vorta, on the planet where they first encountered them, from orbit?

I'd have thought that, if that were REMOTELY accurate, they'd have hit the "scan the entire planet in seconds" button, and instantaneously known that "there are several villainous aliens on the planet below, with these exact piece of hardware which do these exact things."

Did I miss that part of that episode? Must've been cut for a commercial break, huh?
 
Cary L Brown
About ZPE
Richard Feynman predicts it - with his Quantum Electrodynamics theory - and practical experiments prove it exists.
Dr Malone says it exists and lists the experiments that prove it:
"1) the Casimir Effect, 2) the Lamb shift, 3) Van der Waal's forces, 4) diamagnetism, 5) spontaneous emission, 6) microdegree liquid Helium, 7) quantum noise and most recently, 8) cosmological antigravity. Awaiting experimental verification is that inertia and gravity are also proof of ZPE" - that's the summary.
All the scientists who wrote the papers he quoted says it exists - any many others.

You claim I'm the one who claims the Earth is flat when, ironically, you are the one - you defend an old fashioned ideea despite overwhelming facts that prove your ideea false.

About star trek sensors - in TNG: Relics, Enterprise scanns an ENTIRE DYSON SPHERE in a matter of hours. In Voyager, the ship is shown scanning miles beneath a planet - in seconds - and finding lifeforms in stasis! (Voyager:The Thraw).

And about the mines - your argument is essentially that nothing onscreen refers to ZPE. Well, nothing onscreen refers to extracting energy from the wormhole/cloud - and, unlike these, ZPE would actually work.
 
You claim I'm the one who claims the Earth is flat when, ironically, you are the one - you defend an old fashioned ideea despite overwhelming facts that prove your ideea false.

Straw Man.

About star trek sensors - in TNG: Relics, Enterprise scanns an ENTIRE DYSON SPHERE in a matter of hours.

And yet nothing is said about how complete the scan is. Most of their time scanning is spent with worrying about the sphere's contained star.
 
Cary L Brown
About ZPE
Richard Feynman predicts it - with his Quantum Electrodynamics theory - and practical experiments prove it exists.
Dr Malone says it exists and lists the experiments that prove it:
"1) the Casimir Effect, 2) the Lamb shift, 3) Van der Waal's forces, 4) diamagnetism, 5) spontaneous emission, 6) microdegree liquid Helium, 7) quantum noise and most recently, 8) cosmological antigravity.
Heh... really? Apart from the Casimr effect, I have heard Lamb shift and Van der Waal's forces explained using conventional electromagnetism (especially Van der Waals, which apparently involves interaction of slightly polaric atoms). Spontaneous emission doesn't seem to have anything to do with ZEP, neither does liquid helium. I've never heard of "Quantum noise" in this context, and cosmological antigravity is not believed to exist.

And about the mines - your argument is essentially that nothing onscreen refers to ZPE. Well, nothing onscreen refers to extracting energy from the wormhole/cloud - and, unlike these, ZPE would actually work.

Half right. Starships ALREADY extract energy from charged plasma in their own drive systems, and a method of doing so is already known today in the field of magneto-plasmadynamics. On the other hand there is no method--not even a hypothetical one--to extract gigawatt-levels of energy from ZPE alone.
 
Richard Feynman predicts it - with his Quantum Electrodynamics theory - and practical experiments prove it exists.
Dr Malone says it exists and lists the experiments that prove it:
"1) the Casimir Effect, 2) the Lamb shift, 3) Van der Waal's forces, 4) diamagnetism, 5) spontaneous emission, 6) microdegree liquid Helium, 7) quantum noise and most recently, 8) cosmological antigravity. Awaiting experimental verification is that inertia and gravity are also proof of ZPE" - that's the summary.
All the scientists who wrote the papers he quoted says it exists - any many others.
I'm going to guess that you don't do anything related to science in your actual life. Am I wrong?

Please understand this, if nothing else... I DO NOT OPPOSE THE CONCEPT OF ZERO POINT ENERGY. I LIKE IT. I HOPE IT PROVES TO BE TRUE.

However, that's literally all we have right now. Not the first real shred of PROOF that it is real.

You list a series of scientific terms, above, but it's remarkably clear that you're merely tossing out terms.

The scientific method is a very robust, very CHALLENGING thing. Making a claim (even a claim which later proves true) is not sufficient to say it's a fact.

Could there be a "zero point energy field?" It's certainly possible. I'm not saying anything to the contrary.

Could there be a way of tapping into it to derive usable energy? It's certainly possible. I'm not saying anything to the contrary.

Is there any experimental evidence which proves either the existence of this or demonstrates any practical method of interacting with it?

NO.

Maybe there will be, someday. And when someone actually does either of the above... publishes their results... subjects their work to peer review and open, fully-scrutinized review and repetition... and it proves to be accurate, repeatable, and recognized through peer review... THEN, AND ONLY THEN, CAN WE CALL IT "PROVED."

Anyone who has the true grasp of real science knows that this is how it works.

I've read "official-ish" works... pretending to borrow technical terms from "official" science... claiming that we already have working antigravity, or free power, or perpetual motion devices, or telepathy machines, or so on and so on. Hell, I've read the freakin' unredacted MAJESTIC documents, seen the design for "Silver Bug" and all that stuff... and I was briefed, during my time, on the protocols for dealing with possible "alien interactions."

I believe that SOME of this stuff is true, but I demand a higher level of proof than "somebody with a NON-TECHNICAL DEGREE (MA is "master of arts," not "master of sciences," by the way!), who misquotes and misinterprets real physicists, but who publishes a book on the topic, as "proof" of anything. I don't believe that any more than I believe that we need to wear tin-foil hats to prevent our brain power from being sucked out by Xenu.

Hell, even if Xenu is really doing it... until we've got PROOF, it's not proven.
You claim I'm the one who claims the Earth is flat when, ironically, you are the one - you defend an old fashioned ideea despite overwhelming facts that prove your ideea false.
You are out of your freakin' mind. :rolleyes:

There is not ONE fact, much less "overwhelming facts," to support your claim. REAL SCIENCE, and REAL FACT, is not "old fashioned." The universe doesn't care what order we discover things, and when we discover something new, the knowledge we already have isn't magically erased and overwritten.

That's what bad science fiction writers do. Not how the real world works.

You are treating something which has yet to even meet the scientific requirement to be called a HYPOTHESIS, doesn't even approach the level of rigor required to be called a THEORY, and yet you want to treat it as though it's a FACT.

That's something that only the most incompetent "religious fanatic" does. The type who punish those who don't go along with a particular orthodoxy (including certain "scientific orthodoxies" like the old "Earth-centric cosmos" model). Not something anyone remotely interested in actual science does.

Again... before you play the "straw man" card again... I am not saying that "there is no such thing as the zero-point-energy field" and I'm not saying "there is no way to tap into such a thing." I am saying that we DO NOT KNOW.

It is pure speculation. Not an unreasonable mental exercise, and it sure will be great if it turns out to be the case, but we simply don't have any evidence.

The real scientists don't claim that "it is proven." Only the crackpots say that sort of thing. That the crackpots like to pull up the names of real, competent scientists (who toss out IDEAS) and pretend that those ideas are somehow "FACTS" says more about the crackpots than about the scientists whose ideas are being misrepresented.

Those engaged in real science do not claim that "ZPE is proven." Those who DO say that are either incompetents or liars. Sorry to be so harsh, but I'm tired of you pushing this (admittedly cool) IDEA as though it's "proven fact." It's not.
About star trek sensors - in TNG: Relics, Enterprise scanns an ENTIRE DYSON SPHERE in a matter of hours. In Voyager, the ship is shown scanning miles beneath a planet - in seconds - and finding lifeforms in stasis! (Voyager:The Thraw).
Well... there are far more cases of sensors not being able to find a particular person, even knowing what part of the planet they're on. Or not finding a particular piece of technology (Vaal comes to mind, though there are countless others). Not until they (a) knew what to look for, and (b) focused their efforts in that area.

The real point there is that sensors, like everything else, work at the "speed of script." And some writing treated them as "magic voice of god" devices, while other scripts treated them as reasonable technological tools.

Do you believe that, with that "entire scan of the dyson sphere" that the Enterprise learned every single secret about that sphere in that "matter of hours?"

Or, is it more like saying that you could "photograph the entire surface of the earth from orbit in a matter of hours" from the space shuttle? This is, after all, a TRUE statement, isn't it? You can do that.

Doesn't mean that you know every state of every quark on the Earth, though, does it? It only means that you've "built a map." To learn more specifics, you need to focus on specific points. If you want, using that first "map," you can then (on the next pass) focus on downtown Los Angeles, for instance, and maybe get enough resolution to pick out license plate numbers.

This is a simple concept called "Data Resolution." And it will always apply, even in the 24th century. Except when really bad writing by people who think it's just the "magic voice" let it do otherwise.
And about the mines - your argument is essentially that nothing onscreen refers to ZPE. Well, nothing onscreen refers to extracting energy from the wormhole/cloud - and, unlike these, ZPE would actually work.
The first part of your statement is true. Nothing refers to ANY power source, or raw matter source, for that matter.

But your obsession with promoting the fantasy solution you've chosen... and it is FANTASY, both from a "real science" standpoint and an "on-screen" standpoint... as being "true" while other explanations are inherently flawed (because you didn't come up with them) is pretty sad.

I've pointed out the problems with your "zero point" solution. I'll do it again.

(1) Controllable ZPE would be a complete "context shift" for everything in Trek. This has not happened in any episode or film we've been shown.

(2) There is no "canon" reference at any time to ZPE. The only reference I know of is in the DS9 TM, and ONLY referring to it as a "warhead" technology. I actually LIKE this explanation... but I am not silly enough to somehow think it qualifies as "reality"... either in-universe or in reality.

(3) Using ZPE to power the mines does NOTHING for the issue of "raw material" which is required for these mines to function as shown on-screen. Remember, they seeded a few mines, and they "grew" into a full minefield. And remember, Trekkian "replicator" technology doesn't create matter, it only transforms it from one form to another.

(4) It is unfathomable that Rom, a goofy bartender on DS9, would develop a technology that no one else, in tens of thousands of populated worlds just in the Federation "realm of influence" had ever managed to do. This is even more significant when we consider your "Borg" argument... do you really think that Rom was given access to Borg vessel technologies by the major powers? Unlikely.

Yet, it is VERY likely that, being on DS9, having access to DS9 systems and personnel, and an opportunity to observe the wormhole (something nobody can do without being in the vicinity of the wormhole... unless you think "magic voice" sensors can scan anything in the universe at any range with infinite accuracy, I suppose), he might be able to come up with a means of tapping "wormhole energy" that all the brightest minds in the galaxy hadn't quite figured out. It's not like it would be all that useful anyplace else, is it, so why would they be trying?

(5) Then, there is the issue of common sense. The "galaxy-destroying bacterial infection of self-replicating mines" if you have the slightest malfunction. We've seen how unreliable technology can be, even in TNG-era times, haven't we? How, exactly, would you address that issue? Having the mines only able to be powered in one location (or if transplanted to another location with similar, but rare, conditions, I suppose) would be a CRITICAL "safety factor" in the decision to allow such a thing to be created.

How would YOU address that issue? I have yet to see you respond to that concept. So... respond to it now, please.
 
Cary, I think these two are vying for us in the 'most stupid trek tech fight' category. I should make a prize...
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top