• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

ship manual test

judge alba

senior street judge
Commodore
sorry to be a pain but i was wondering if some one could give this a quick read through. it's a test page of a ship manual back ground that I'm working on. there's no pics yet but i was wondering if this reads OK for others.
my thinking is the Connie's are by the time of the next generation are buy now obsolete but were mothballed in case of a war that never happened, but starfleet are short of numbers at this time
it's not fully complete but hopefully it will help decide how to go about the manual which will be along the lines of the old fasa ship combat game books when completed. it will be mainly ships that are rarely seen on the stage of the 2370's and will have many of my own designs as well.

Tng constitution mark V

The few Connie's left in service are refits from the original vessels of the late 2200’s. they were once at the fore front of star fleets early exploration and were considered the best of their day, which is possibly the reason why a few were still operating nearly 100 years after the first vessels were built.

The few in service were all constructed just after 2280 and thus are not the original build Connie's, but rather the enterprise sub-class that first came into service in 2270.

However even these were upgraded in 2320 and served well for a number of years before being mothballed as the Khitomer accords were signed though part of the agreement was that Star fleet reduce the number of vessels in service. This Star fleet decided was the perfect time to decommission a very popular but old starship design.

However, in 2369 the Borg had destroyed a Star fleet fleet at Wolf 359 which left Star fleet seriously under strength at the time, they decided to see what could be brought back into service they saw 20 Connie's laying in various ship depot and found that with a few upgrades could be made part of Starfleet again thus they underwent their fifth and final major upgrade with more powerful warp engines and a more powerful torpedo system.
Their quarters were Spartan for the mid 24th century so the originals were refitted to make them more comfortable as were many of the ships systems.

However, no matter what upgrades they had it was clear, they could never be considered front line ships any more and so they were assigned inner world duties freeing up newer classes of ships for frontier work. But by 2372 only six ships were still operational as the others were either too worm out or just outclassed by pirate vessels thus the last six were briefly put into the training program then after a year of this the Connie's were given their final rest and so 08 may 2373 the last constitution class vessel the U.S.S eagle was docked in berth four of the Starfleet museum in orbit of Jupiter next to the only original constitution the U.S.S Yorktown.


One ship, the U.S.S Norman bates has the rather dubious distinction of having one of the shortest operational life of any star fleet ship, that of 12 hours. She left space dock in 2369 all refitted and ready for service when first an engine imbalance almost destroyed her, after this a complete systems failure killed the crew after first the communications failed then the life support systems fail this was followed by the ship launching all the lifeboats before anyone could use them. The ship was found a week later with everyone on board dead. She was towed back to the space dock but many refused to serve on her so she was scrapped though it is rumored while being scrapped an engineering crew was killed in an explosion while they disconnected the primary hull.
 
Okay, a number of thoughts on this. First, the idea of resurrecting a Constitution-class starship in the 24th century is just outrageous! ;)

Seriously though, I think it's a neat idea. That being said, you might want to proof read a bit more closely. You've got Starfleet spelled Star fleet as well as Starfleet. Typically, it's accepted to be Starfleet... all one word. In addition, you've got some capitalization problems, most noticeably with ship names.

Oh, and Norman Bates as the name of a starship? No disrespect intended, but that just sucks all the seriousness right out of your document. The idea that Starfleet would name a ship after a fictional sociopath from a 20th century movie is a bit of a stretch. However, if you were going for tongue-in-cheek, then mission accomplished. :lol:
 
Last edited:
you should also refer to them as Constitution-class or just Constitutions....referring to them as connie's doesn't make sense at all...

i agree with Gibraltar....and plus the USS Yorktown could not be the original Constitution test bed vessel....it would be the USS Constitution....they always name a ship-class after the first vessel built with that design....
 
There was never an "Enterprise sub-class". The only evidence of a class for the ship from Trek 1-6 was the printouts Scotty was reading in Star Trek VI that listed the ship as "Constitution class".

Was there any mention of TOS Enterprise being a Constitution class ship? There was some text on the technical manual screens in "Space Seed" showing the USS Constitution as NCC 1700.....but is there any firm evidence the entire class was called Constitution. The plaque on the bridge of TOS Enterprise lists the class as "Starship".
 
sorry meant the Yorktown was one of the original configuration vessels from the second batch of ships built similar to kirk's ship have to sort that out.

i know there wasn't any canonevidence that the refits were a sub class but i sort of consider the refits as like a sub class like a constitution2 or something. maybe i should call them that? have to think on that some more.

must admit i havent seen any on screen mention of the tos enterprise being a constitution class. i just assumed it was of the same class as the contitution herself.
 
The Enterprise-class comes from TMP blueprint set. Andrew Probert (an artist who worked on the movies and other Trek) was vocal during the movies that the new ship be called Enterprise class. His logic was that the ship was a new build rather than a refit of the old Enterprise. And, in celebration of Captain Kirk's exploits, this new type of vessel be called Enterprise Class. Of course, onscreen dialog pretty much confirms that the old ship was refitted and redesigned.

If you've seen the blueprint set, you will notice that on all the sheets that feature the Enterprise, the class given is Starship II. On one of the sheets Klingon ship sheets it mentions Enterprise class as being a match for the K'Tinga cruiser. So who knows......the evidence is a bit contradictory.

The only onscreen mention of Enterprise Class was a sign at Starfleet Academy during TWOK. This sign reads: "Mark IV Simulator" on the top line and "Enterprise Class" on the bottom line. Since the Contstitution class nomenclature is indesputable in Trek VI, a reasoning for TWOK sign could be that Mark IV is the type of bridge seen in the movie ships (Reliant, Enterprise, Saratoga, Yorktown, ect) and Enterprise class refers to the cadets assigned the training shp Enterprise.

I believe the book, The Making Of Star Trek might have indicated that the heavy cruiser from TOS was Constitution class. However, Starship class is what appeared on the bridge plaque.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top