Actually, we all have.....Also, I think Marco marked my address as a spam source.
Personally, I don't see what value the numbering system added to the books, especially since they weren't in chronological order. It also made the numbered books appear "lesser" than the unnumbered paperbacks (of which there weren't that many).
Voyages of Imagination doesn't provide any further information, either.Steve Roby said:Answering a question on the Psi Phi bulletin board in June, 2000, about the dropping of numbers from Pocket's Star Trek novels, John Ordover said, "97 will, I think, be a stand-alone by Dayton Ward, then a trilogy by Diane Carey to bring the numbering to an end. Working title is The Last Round-Up. This is all tentative, of course." The plan then was to end the numbered original series novels at 100 and then reboot the series with "Lower Decks"-style novels, looking at major events in original series continuity from the perspective of junior officers and crew. Dayton Ward's novel, In the Name of Honor, was indeed original series novel 97. However, the Carey trilogy has disappeared from the schedule and apparently been replaced by a single novel, The Last Roundup, by Christie Golden. The current schedule shows no more numbered books, so the buildup to 100 has presumably been dropped
Yes, that's right. I killed the TOS numbering. I killed it to death!!
As I recall, The Last Roundup was originally conceived as TOS #98-100, but ended up being (heavily) reworked into a single hardcover.
IDoes anyone (did anyone) catalogue their books chronologically, without regard to keeping the series separate?
I did have The Buried Age, but I've got no clue what I did with it, and I'm quite annoyed with myself about that one.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.