• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Shatner in Next Movie - Treklit Implications ?

Everything I've always heard is that the books are absolutely required to be consistent with on screen cannon, no exceptions.

Well, yes, but I have the impression that Pocket doesn't have the license to use elements of the Bad Robot films in the novels. If that's so, then we wouldn't get to contradict what's in the movies, but wouldn't get to use it overtly either. We'd probably just avoid the issue.

Remember that it was only with the Totality trilogy that the Shatnerverse overtly began contradicting the main novelverse. Up to that point, they'd just been kind of politely avoiding each other -- the other books operated on the assumption that Kirk was dead, but didn't explicitly rule out the events of the Shatner novels happening off to the side somewhere. In the highly speculative event that Kirk Prime were somehow resurrected in the movies, the books would probably just avoid discussing it. I mean, as long as he isn't established as, say, taking over command of the Enterprise-E or becoming Federation president, it shouldn't be necessary to mention him. After all, 24th-century books usually get along just fine without mentioning TOS characters at all. It really shouldn't be an issue even if it did happen.

Even if Shatner makes a cameo, that does not necessarily mean that he will appear as James T. Kirk. I could see him pop up as some admiral or other Federation official, perhaps even as Pine-Kirk's older relative. He would have a few quick lines, a la Stan Lee in the Marvel movies, with a wink and a nod to the audience.

While he could certainly end up changing him mind, Shatner has been pretty clear in the past that he's not particularly interested in that kind of role.

The only thing in Trek Lit this could affect are the "Shatnerverse" novels. Which-

A) Aren't part of the novel continuity.

B) Haven't had a new book since 2007.

Not seeing how this is going to be an issue, even if it is true.

This isn't true. Everything I've always heard is that the books are absolutely required to be consistent with on screen cannon, no exceptions. IF the new movie resurrects Kirk in the prime universe within the time frame that the current Treklit is operating in, then those books will absolutely be operating in a world with a resurrected Kirk. Now maybe the books might just choose not to deal with Kirk, but the possibility remains that it could impact Treklit.

Aren't you getting ahead of yourself here? At this moment we only have a rumour regarding the possibility that Shatner might appear in the next movie. Even if he does, this does not automatically mean he will be Captain Kirk alive and active in the 2380s of the Prime Universe.

And even if, and I stress if that is how things play out, then the movie is going to have to address how he's come back from the dead, and I'm fairly certain it should be no problem for the novel continuity to mold around that. It's just another recent development. "Oh, so Captain Kirk's back from the dead? Splendid, but what does this have to do with our conference with the Typhon Pact? Nothing? Very good, proceed at maximum warp."

The only novels that Kirk Prime returning to life are going to be an issue for are the Shatnerverse, but that line is inactive and wasn't a part of the novel continuity to begin with so all is good.

I agree with all of this, I was just responding to Wormhole's statement that the only way it could affect the novels are the Shatner verse. My point is that's not correct, because even though we don't know anything for sure, there's still the possibility that Shatner is used in some way that could affect the current novelverse.
 
You just said you agree with my second post, where I re-iterate only the Shatnerverse novels would be affected by Shatner's potential appearance in the movie, while saying my first post that only the Shatnerverse novels would be affected by Shatner's potential appearance is wrong.

It is after all the Shatnerverse that would be contradicted if it were suddenly revealed that Kirk was dead since 2371 only to get resurrected in 2388 or whenever, as that would cancel out all the adventures Kirk had in the years in between. In novel continuity, Kirk died in 2371 and stayed dead. A potential resurrection in 2388 is not going to contradict anything in the novel continuity.
 
You just said you agree with my second post, where I re-iterate only the Shatnerverse novels would be affected by Shatner's potential appearance in the movie, while saying my first post that only the Shatnerverse novels would be affected by Shatner's potential appearance is wrong.

It is after all the Shatnerverse that would be contradicted if it were suddenly revealed that Kirk was dead since 2371 only to get resurrected in 2388 or whenever, as that would cancel out all the adventures Kirk had in the years in between. In novel continuity, Kirk died in 2371 and stayed dead. A potential resurrection in 2388 is not going to contradict anything in the novel continuity.

Ok, now we're getting into minutiae that's really not important, but there's a difference between "affect" and "contradict", they are two separate things. I agree bringing back Kirk wouldn't contradict anything in the current novels, but that's the first time you brought up the issue of contradicting. This thread isn't about contradicting the novelverse. The issue is could it affect the current novel timeline, which is what you said it wouldn't do, and which is what I was responding to.
 
It is after all the Shatnerverse that would be contradicted if it were suddenly revealed that Kirk was dead since 2371 only to get resurrected in 2388 or whenever, as that would cancel out all the adventures Kirk had in the years in between. In novel continuity, Kirk died in 2371 and stayed dead. A potential resurrection in 2388 is not going to contradict anything in the novel continuity.

On-screen, there is nothing that would contradict Kirk being resurrected in 2372. A line from Spock Prime would be all it takes.

Hell, Kirk could come riding through a cross dimension time rift commanding the Enterprise-E with a line stating he'd been in command for the last seven or eight years. That would complicate the novelverse.
 
Some thoughts on Shatner's possible appearance in the next film...

There's no way, even with CGI trickery, that a 2016 Shatner can reasonably pass for a 1994 pre-Generations Shatner. CGI is good, but it's not that good.

If Shatner appears, I'd honestly prefer that he appear as an aged JJ-verse Shatner. Perhaps there's an epilogue where, circa 2315, JJ-verse Kirk and Spock return the site of the film's main action. That would work for me.
 
If Shatner appears, I'd honestly prefer that he appear as an aged JJ-verse Shatner. Perhaps there's an epilogue where, circa 2315, JJ-verse Kirk and Spock return the site of the film's main action. That would work for me.

If they bring Shatner in, I want to see him in the captain's chair one last time. I'm okay with it being an aged, Abramsverse Kirk.
 
The way Trek lit is always playing "catch up" with new canon developments is one of the things I love most about it. I'm not sure why, perhaps it's because I enjoy the creative mental gymnastics required in order to reconcile things. It's not essential, and sometimes it goes horribly wrong, but when done right it's awesome.

For example, I'm curious if the novels are going to deal with McCoy's line in ID about giving a C-section to a pregnant Gorn, when in the novelverse the Gorn lay eggs. It's minor enough that they'll probably just ignore it. Or maybe from now on all Gorn give birth, glossing over the discontinuity? Or perhaps just some types do, like the Xindi?
 
I would rather see a Shatner prime playing against Spock prime versus their JJverse analogues. There are many ways to do it from Q to transporter duplication.
 
If Shatner appears, I'd honestly prefer that he appear as an aged JJ-verse Shatner. Perhaps there's an epilogue where, circa 2315, JJ-verse Kirk and Spock return the site of the film's main action. That would work for me.

Or they could remake "The Deadly Years," and have Kirk, Spock, Sulu, Chekov, and Uhura all turn into their older selves... :D
 
If Shatner appears, I'd honestly prefer that he appear as an aged JJ-verse Shatner. Perhaps there's an epilogue where, circa 2315, JJ-verse Kirk and Spock return the site of the film's main action. That would work for me.

Or they could remake "The Deadly Years," and have Kirk, Spock, Sulu, Chekov, and Uhura all turn into their older selves... :D

... to be magically cured by Khan's super-blood.
 
I'm curious if the novels are going to deal with McCoy's line in ID about giving a C-section to a pregnant Gorn, when in the novelverse the Gorn lay eggs.
It's McCoy; it could easily be a shorthand reference to having to assist with a particularly complex and, let's say nasty Gorn birth...
 
That's the thing about medical science. You never know what you'll run into. The egg didn't release with the others, no one realized the egg was left inside, it developed inside the Gorn, and a C section had to be done as the egg was beginning to hatch. All concerned were just lucky enough to have McCoy there when it was hatching and the C section had to be done.
 
That's the thing about medical science. You never know what you'll run into. The egg didn't release with the others, no one realized the egg was left inside, it developed inside the Gorn, and a C section had to be done as the egg was beginning to hatch. All concerned were just lucky enough to have McCoy there when it was hatching and the C section had to be done.

Works for me...
 
Out of left field, but didn't I read recently that Zoe Saldana is currently pregnant with twins? When is filming due to start on JJ-Trek 3?
 
If they had the stones to let Uhura be carrying Spock's child (children?) I'd be pretty psyched.
 
Out of left field, but didn't I read recently that Zoe Saldana is currently pregnant with twins? When is filming due to start on JJ-Trek 3?
I think February. But as seen in Captain America: The Winter Soldier, it's amazing what they can do with CG to hide a pregnancy.

That said, Uhura having Spock's kids would be interesting...
 
Out of left field, but didn't I read recently that Zoe Saldana is currently pregnant with twins? When is filming due to start on JJ-Trek 3?
I think February. But as seen in Captain America: The Winter Soldier, it's amazing what they can do with CG to hide a pregnancy.
Scarlett Johannson's daughter was born in September 2014. Main filming for Captain America: The Winter Soldier completed in June 2013. Did you mean concealing her pregnancy in filming for Avengers: Age of Ultron?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top