Yes, but I suspect, Teya and Es, that neither one of you would wear that catsuit to work.
Depending on where you work, of course.
There's nothing wrong with dressing sexy off-duty. In fact, that would have been nice for Trek generally if we could have sometimes seen a clear difference between duty clothes and play clothes, rather than those dreary things that Trek wardrobe tended to put people in on those few occasions when it bothered with civvies. Teya's right that the fashions tend to be awful - it's pretty sad when the most colorful things most people wear are their uniforms. If they could have done it well, I think that would have been great. But that's a topic for another thread.(There was one 2-3 weeks ago in the general Trek forum.) I suspect it was primarily done for budget reasons, though I think that's kind of a lame excuse, but heck, maybe they really think people in the 24th century will like boring clothes. I suspect they are wrong about that, though.
So I think that addresses your "double-standard" point, Exodus. Did Kirk go shirtless on the bridge? No, he did not. There's a time and a place for everything.
As for the age thing, I'm 51, so I don't think your logic applies to me there either.
Anyway, the point isn't "Did Seven look good in the catsuit?" because of course she did. She'd look good in a burlap bag. The point is, "What should a member of the Voyager crew wear to work?" That catsuit is marginal - the stupid high-heel shoes are not. And even if the costume did originally have a point, opaque as that point might be to me, why not use her wardrobe to help show her evolution as a character? She could so easily have looked beautiful and sexy in any number of wardrobe choices, but instead, they went for trashy.
I don't get the no quarters thing, either, Teya and Praetor. Yet another lost opportunity to allow the character to evolve past "poor little drone girl" status.

There's nothing wrong with dressing sexy off-duty. In fact, that would have been nice for Trek generally if we could have sometimes seen a clear difference between duty clothes and play clothes, rather than those dreary things that Trek wardrobe tended to put people in on those few occasions when it bothered with civvies. Teya's right that the fashions tend to be awful - it's pretty sad when the most colorful things most people wear are their uniforms. If they could have done it well, I think that would have been great. But that's a topic for another thread.(There was one 2-3 weeks ago in the general Trek forum.) I suspect it was primarily done for budget reasons, though I think that's kind of a lame excuse, but heck, maybe they really think people in the 24th century will like boring clothes. I suspect they are wrong about that, though.
So I think that addresses your "double-standard" point, Exodus. Did Kirk go shirtless on the bridge? No, he did not. There's a time and a place for everything.
As for the age thing, I'm 51, so I don't think your logic applies to me there either.
Anyway, the point isn't "Did Seven look good in the catsuit?" because of course she did. She'd look good in a burlap bag. The point is, "What should a member of the Voyager crew wear to work?" That catsuit is marginal - the stupid high-heel shoes are not. And even if the costume did originally have a point, opaque as that point might be to me, why not use her wardrobe to help show her evolution as a character? She could so easily have looked beautiful and sexy in any number of wardrobe choices, but instead, they went for trashy.
I don't get the no quarters thing, either, Teya and Praetor. Yet another lost opportunity to allow the character to evolve past "poor little drone girl" status.