• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

News Seth MacFarlane’s The Orville

I have a question on the whole tonal shift thing? How come people love a series like Orange is the New Black but deride The Orville on the basis of "It doesn't know what it wants to be"? We've seen Dramady before, mainly in that show, or Ally McBeal, or even Boston Legal. I keep reading the whole thing about it has to be one thing or the other and I don't understand that complaint. I think The Orville knows exactly what it wants to be and if it finds an audience, great. I enjoy the casualness of it, the likeable and relatable characters, and just a show that offers true escapism from the crap in media we are inundated with on a day to day basis. If the show doesn't succeed, than fine, but considering Fox's relationship with McFarlane, mainly because of Family guy, I see this show lasting at least 2 seasons if not more.

When I think about "Orville" and it's style I kind of think, not of a tv show, but "Ghostbusters" and I mean the classic one. It's not a drama but a comedy adventure show that will have a few serious moments from time to time.

Jason
 
I did say a baseline. All the other characters are developed as the series goes, as Frasier did so well.

Yeah, that doesn't mean anything.

Are we done yet? I'm tired of people taking a good point and focusing on an example in it instead of the point. If you don't like "Frasier", insert your own example that works for you. The point still stands.
 
I did say a baseline. All the other characters are developed as the series goes, as Frasier did so well.

Frasier was a spinoff, and a lot of his problems, ex-wife and son in Boston, were a huge part of his character. Adding an everyman character that was no different from Cliff and Norm or a stuck-up brother who was essentially Frasier on Cheers to play off of, was like shooting fish in a barrel.

Yeah, that doesn't mean anything.

Are we done yet? I'm tired of people taking a good point and focusing on an example in it instead of the point. If you don't like "Frasier", insert your own example that works for you. The point still stands.

It may not work for you, which is fair. But I've found The Orville very entertaining.
 
My biggest, and I mean biggest concern is, will Mercer really stop trying to do comedy with Bortus. I don't think he'll be able to help himself with a natural born straight man like that.

I say he goes 1 episode. Who's giving odds?
I think it's kind of like how people in Trek are always messing with vulcans
 
Yeah, that doesn't mean anything.

Are we done yet? I'm tired of people taking a good point and focusing on an example in it instead of the point. If you don't like "Frasier", insert your own example that works for you. The point still stands.

Wait I loved Frasier and I was using your example. I was just trying to make a point that it’s not really fair to judge a show based on one episode and that frasier had a backstory to fill in the gaps.

With that said I guess we are done. Sorry I struck a nerve.
 
After a while they seemed just rude. Yes, Vulcans don't get your sense of humor. Are you proud of yourself?

Mercer and Bortus don't seem that far removed from Neelix who was always trying to make Tuvok smile.
 
I have a question on the whole tonal shift thing? How come people love a series like Orange is the New Black but deride The Orville on the basis of "It doesn't know what it wants to be"? We've seen Dramady before, mainly in that show, or Ally McBeal, or even Boston Legal. I keep reading the whole thing about it has to be one thing or the other and I don't understand that complaint. I think The Orville knows exactly what it wants to be and if it finds an audience, great. I enjoy the casualness of it, the likeable and relatable characters, and just a show that offers true escapism from the crap in media we are inundated with on a day to day basis.
What some people question about Orange" is, is it a comedy or a drama? That's not the case with Orville.

When critics and some viewers say Orville doesn't know what it wants to be, the reference is to whether it is a Star Trek parody or a (comedic) homage to Star Trek, not 'is it a drama or a comedy'. Prior to the premiere, McFarlane specifically stated that the show was not a parody and was an homage (a la Galaxy Quest).

The question of what it wants to be arose about Orange because the comedy is so sharp and the drama so strong, that either label might legitimately be applied. I don't think the same can be said of Orville yet. Doesn't mean it won't evolve into Orange (with respect to comedy or drama), it just hasn't happened in the first two episodes.

But after watching the first couple of episodes, I'd say the Orville, with all of the "man/"dude" talk and jokes about Compton, is firmly in the parody category. Now, that might change as the season wears on. We shall see. This isn't a criticism, but going forward, I'll be watching the show for what I think it actually is, based on what I'm seeing on screen rather than what Seth has told us the show is.
 
At least, Mercer seemed to get that his humor was not working and that he should stop it.
Imagine a RL similar situation. Someone has got a new foreign coworker and purposely and continuously makes jokes with references that the new colleague can't understand and therefore always makes him feel left out.

And then he sneers at him because he don't get the jokes.

This "someone" wouldn't be a nice person.
 
Most of the comedy is tumble weeds passing by because it's not funny. So far the drama is seriously lacking. He's just not doing it right.

I really wish people wouldn't keep making grand declarations about something as subjective as humor. 90% of the jokes work for me. They don't for you. Some people find things hilarious that I just barely chuckle at, other people are completely left cold by things that make me spit out my proverbial drink.

It's one thing if there's an overwhelming consensus that the humor doesn't work, or if you're a long-time fan of the writer's previous humor and this time it's leaving you cold.

But that's not the case. Lots of people find the show's humor funny, even if there's some who are categorically against even oblique references to bodily functions (episode contains one cringe comedy bit where a person discusses colon diseases, yet some people act as if they're watching Freddy Got Fingered).

If he wants comedy and drama mixed together done right, see "Scrubs". If he wants comedy in the work place with quirk, see "Newsradio".

Funny example there with Scrubs. While I enjoyed the show, I almost never laughed at it. The humor of that show was this frenetic machine gunning of quips and people behaving farcically, which I find amusing but not hilarious. Yet I wouldn't dream of declaring Scrubs an unfunny show because it doesn't make ME laugh.

As an example of my sense of humor, here's a random list of TV and movies that have made me fall over laughing - Fawlty Towers, Blackadder 2-4, A Fish Called Wanda, Frasier, Better Off Ted, Parks and Rec, Community, most Apatow comedies. With regards to MacFarlane, Family Guy makes me laugh more often than not.

A more constructive discussion about The Orville would be whether the show succeeds in the balancing act between drama and comedy. If you personally don't find the drama engaging or the humor funny, then that's wholly subjective. But I think the flow of the show is less so, and personally I found the pilot was a bit awkward whereas Command Performance was really great and felt exactly like a mid-run Berman era Quark or Q-focused episode. Exciting but not too serious, the jokes work as an organic part of the story. The pilot was more like "Exposition. Cut to joke. Now some drama. Everyone stop for a joke."
 
In terms of Frasier, they already had the characters backstory as a baseline.

You mean, the only child whose father was dead?

Frasier sometimes got some humor out of his attempts to explain to Cheers drop-in characters why he'd lied in Boston about his life story. :lol:
 
http://comicbook.com/startrek/2017/09/21/the-orville-about-a-girl-review-star-trek/

"Watching Captain Mercer and his crew debate the proper course of action feels reminiscent of watching Captain Picard do the same thing with the crew of the Enterprise. There’s even a point where the debate turns into a legal battle that almost seems inspired by the classic Next Generation episode “The Measure of a Man.”

“About a Girl” feels as if MacFarlane found a lost Next Generation script and brought it to life, adding a few of his own touches along the way. For Star Trek fans still trying to figure out how they feel about the new Fox series, this episode of The Orville is a must-watch."
 
Well, it'll be nice if the episode is only as tepid as the average Modern Trek allegory. :lol:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top