Tough crowd, tough crowd! But, maybe us nerds would like a flipping sweet drama about The Today Show, basically?
We want For All Mankind, stop jerking us around. More Moore! More Moore! More Moore!
(But not on the moors.)
Tough crowd, tough crowd! But, maybe us nerds would like a flipping sweet drama about The Today Show, basically?
I understand why, say, tobacco company executives make gobs of money. Doesn't mean I want to watch a series that depicts them as heroes for doing so.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_questionBut you asked why did Matt Lauer make lots of money
Well, now you're just being rude.meh, I just stopped caring what you think. In mid sentence no less.
From the EW article it sounds like it's going to be taking a more complex approach to this than him being the "villain" and them being the "heroes".Yeah, that's part of my wariness - that, in order to further cast the Lauer character as the villain (which Lauer totally was), the show, going by the preview, will almost certainly make heroes out of the other hosts, who in reality get tens of millions of dollars to sit on their asses, smile, and make chit-chat with celebrity guests in as inoffensive a manner as possible. Seriously, Lauer had a yearly salary of $25m - and for what? For asking Tom Cruise a few tough questions a decade ago? For being a face retirees (the only people with time in the morning to actually watch such programs) already recognize? Zero interest from me, thanks - but, in order not to further derail the thread, that's all I'll say on the matter.![]()
From the EW article it sounds like it's going to be taking a more complex approach to this than him being the "villain" and them being the "heroes".
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.