La'an appears to be surrounded by zombies or ghosts of either everyone she has lost or everyone the Enterprise has lost. Distinctive white antannae are next to her...
As others have said, fanzines and letter zines. There is a huge archive of hundreds of excerpts here, which runs through the classic movies:I'm curious. There was no internet then, so where was this hate being demonstrated? I remember seeing it in the theater and don't recall any backlash. But I was just a kid so....
Which is funny because by the late 90s there were those in fandom vilifying Berman and demanding he be fired. And not just fired, some even wanted to "court-martial" him for "crimes against Roddenberry." Yes, what I placed in quotations were the exact terms used at the time.Part of why ENTERPRISE has been reassessed is that there's those who long for the Rick Berman style production.
Other than the quality of special effects I don't see any real differences between 90s and present day Trek.Part of why ENTERPRISE has been reassessed is that there's those who long for the Rick Berman style production.
I love seeing the same talking points as are now with "pseudo-Trek." Or now "proper or real Trek" or some variation on how Trek has become something lesser than it was before.As others have said, fanzines and letter zines. There is a huge archive of hundreds of excerpts here, which runs through the classic movies:
The semi-pro Trek fan magazine had collections put out in paperback called Best of Trek. Here's an example of someone not being happy with Search For Spock:
I feel like I'd enjoy hearing even the most bitter Trek takes if they all had to go through an editor to be posted in a zine's letter section.As others have said, fanzines and letter zines. There is a huge archive of hundreds of excerpts here, which runs through the classic movies:
The semi-pro Trek fan magazine had collections put out in paperback called Best of Trek. Here's an example of someone not being happy with Search For Spock:
I think just the idea of time has a lot to do with it too. I love Enterprise, but at the time it aired, I wasn't a fan of Season 3 and didn't watch Season 4 as it was airing. It took me the DVDs to really appreciate what they were trying to do, and now Season 3 is my favorite season of the show. I also found a new appreciation for DS9 through their DVD release in 2003. Part of that is I hadn't seen most of the series since it originally aired, but when you watch something and it's not the center of attention, I think it tends to go down a lot easier. I might try this with Picard season 2, but man I hated that season a lot to the point where I really have to get in the right mood to revisit it.Part of why ENTERPRISE has been reassessed is that there's those who long for the Rick Berman style production. Fans can be very forgiving when it comes to surface level things, you can see that with the adoration STAR TREK CONTINUES gets. Trek during 1987-2005 basically had a very consistent filmmaking language that established a certain rhythm and cadence when it came to camerawork, dialogue, acting style, etc. That just happens when you have the same dozen people like Livingston, Howard, Lauritson, Rush, etc doing the same shtick for 20 years. It's partly why THE ORVILLE has been embraced by those fans, because MacFarlane reached out to a lot of those Berman era creatives because he wanted to make a show that felt as close as it could to the Rick Berman era.
Really? This to me is like suggesting there isn't much difference between 60s Trek and 90s Trek. However, I don't dislike the differences, because I understand a franchise as old as 60 is just going to inevitably have different approaches when creators come and go. Writing and acting styles evolve over time. I cannot imagine a character like Mariner as performed by Tawney Newsome existing in a Rick Berman production in 1996. This is the guy who said a character giving a high five in modern Trek "doesn't sit right with me", because he's an old fuddy duddy who thinks high fives are too modern, even though they've existed for decades at this point.Other than the quality of special effects I don't see any real differences between 90s and present day Trek.
I'm Lower Decks' biggest supporter and I don't think she really fits in a live action Trek series in 2026 either. She's a cartoon character, deliberately exaggerated.I cannot imagine a character like Mariner as performed by Tawney Newsome existing in a Rick Berman production in 1996. This is the guy who said a character giving a high five in modern Trek "doesn't sit right with me", because he's an old fuddy duddy who thinks high fives are too modern, even though they've existed for decades at this point.
Unhelpfully all I can provide for you is it all just feels like Star Trek to me.Really?
She was perfect in the crossover.I'm Lower Decks' biggest supporter and I don't think she really fits in a live action Trek series in 2026 either. She's a cartoon character, deliberately exaggerated.
What does that tell you about SNW?She was perfect in the crossover.
I was speaking more of the SNW interpretation of the character that couldn’t fit a Rick Berman production. Given their rigid approach to sticking to the script they certainly wouldn’t have allowed her to improvise on the setI'm Lower Decks' biggest supporter and I don't think she really fits in a live action Trek series in 2026 either. She's a cartoon character, deliberately exaggerated.
Unhelpfully all I can provide for you is it all just feels like Star Trek to me.
Looking at things objectively is not a skill in my retinueI agree that it all feels like Star Trek, but I can definitely see the things that made each era distinctive from each other, beyond the fact that they were shot in different decades.
It's possible that "reassement" is really just a younger generation coming along with a different opinion than their elders had. My opinions on Voyager haven't changed, but it was the most popular Trek on Netflix, which skews more towards millenials and Gen Z.Part of why ENTERPRISE has been reassessed is that there's those who long for the Rick Berman style production. Fans can be very forgiving when it comes to surface level things, you can see that with the adoration STAR TREK CONTINUES gets. Trek during 1987-2005 basically had a very consistent filmmaking language that established a certain rhythm and cadence when it came to camerawork, dialogue, acting style, etc. That just happens when you have the same dozen people like Livingston, Howard, Lauritson, Rush, etc doing the same shtick for 20 years. It's partly why THE ORVILLE has been embraced by those fans, because MacFarlane reached out to a lot of those Berman era creatives because he wanted to make a show that felt as close as it could to the Rick Berman era.
Interesting. I can see how someone who grew up with TOS wouldn't be happy with that ship crashing. Roddenberry didn't like it and it wouldn't surprise me if he was the source of the leak on Spocks Death in TWOK. He didn't like that either.As others have said, fanzines and letter zines. There is a huge archive of hundreds of excerpts here, which runs through the classic movies:
The semi-pro Trek fan magazine had collections put out in paperback called Best of Trek. Here's an example of someone not being happy with Search For Spock:
It's possible that "reassement" is really just a younger generation coming along with a different opinion than their elders had. My opinions on Voyager haven't changed, but it was the most popular Trek on Netflix, which skews more towards millenials and Gen Z.
Here's an example of someone not being happy with Search For Spock...

it wouldn't surprise me if he was the source of the leak on Spocks Death in TWOK. He didn't like that either...
Story of my fan experience.course, I would not be permitted to attempt to engage with this person in debate, since I didn't watch TOS when it first aired, so not a "true fan".![]()
Skin looks blue to me, but could be the lighting.La'an appears to be surrounded by zombies or ghosts of either everyone she has lost or everyone the Enterprise has lost. Distinctive white antannae are next to her...
And someone in a Vulcan uniform with their back to the camera too.Skin looks blue to me, but could be the lighting.
There also appears to be a Klingon behind her.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.