That's a valid opinion, but I disagree.Part of why ENTERPRISE has been reassessed is that there's those who long for the Rick Berman style production. Fans can be very forgiving when it comes to surface level things, you can see that with the adoration STAR TREK CONTINUES gets. Trek during 1987-2005 basically had a very consistent filmmaking language that established a certain rhythm and cadence when it came to camerawork, dialogue, acting style, etc. That just happens when you have the same dozen people like Livingston, Howard, Lauritson, Rush, etc doing the same shtick for 20 years. It's partly why THE ORVILLE has been embraced by those fans, because MacFarlane reached out to a lot of those Berman era creatives because he wanted to make a show that felt as close as it could to the Rick Berman era.
ENT became good after it completely re-vamped it's style in season 3 & 4 to a more modern television style (heavily inspired by the then current '24').
If ENT had ended after season 2, it probably would still have some fans (like the Orville - where I 100% agree that it's success is only due to mimicking that 90s-00s Trek style) - but it would be more known as an inferior copy of the earlier Trek series.
Instead the consensus seems to be more on the side of "shame it took so long to get good, when it was already too late - oh and the early stuff also isn't as awful as I remember".

