Or not enough of the audience will care. Which is why I think it would be wise for them to bring in a new antagonist, rather than trying to weave this backstory from an episode that less people may care about.
I was the first to point this out. Are there still haters who still don't believe its a strong possibility Sela is the villain? The younger angle, Sela's daughter I believe, could simply be a red herring to what's to come.
It's very much plausible. The last time we saw "Sela" on screen was during TNG: Unification 1 & 2.
No, I don't believe it. Unless Matlas is lying in which case it's pointless to believe anything.
That would be a boring end.
And yet that's exactly what should have happened after her abject stupidity in the Redemption story arc. Assuming that the "weak spot" in the tachyon detection grid was "the ship with the android" was absurd. Once the connection was found between her efforts and the Duras House, that should have been it for her (much like how the BOP in the SNW finale was destroyed once their existence was discovered). Her presence in Unification never should have happened.
Disagreeing with your theory isn't being a 'hater'.
That apparently is only relevant if people trust Matalas.
He says the villain isn't Sela -- he doesn't say it isn't Sela's daughter. He also says there is a nod to Tasha Yar in S3. Sela is a nod to Tasha Yar in S3 (unless they make a "fully functional" allusion somewhere).
