Well, I don't know about taking it personally. Some people like it. Other don't. I happen to be one who doesn't like it. Part of it was the execution. The Doctor was literally a passive recipient of what the Master told her that he found. Of course, that leaves open the door that the Master was lying, so perhaps a silver lining!Honestly, I feel like some people take the Timeless Child thing a little too personally. Maybe its execution wasn't the best (certainly a lot better than the Hybrid crap that I agree was awful and unnecessary and went nowhere), but I am curious to see where Chibnall goes with it.
But, part of it is the storyline itself. I liked the idea that Hartnell was the first. That he was an average Time Lord who got bored and roamed the galaxy. He learned that he wanted to do good and he got the whole Doctor thing down. The Timeless Child undoes that. Yeah, amnesia, I know. It would both allow Hartnell to not be the first but act as though he was. I don't know, just not the same for me.
Instead, we learn that the Doctor is some super being who by accident of birth founded Time Lord society. To me, that's just not as interesting.
Of course, YMMV. Some people aren't as attached to Hartnell being the first or the Doctor is just a regular Time Lord who happens to care. Such is life!
I'll also add that if Chibnall wasn't the showrunner, I'd feel more optimistic about where this is headed. As it is, he just adds another layer of doubt for me.
I am hoping for the best though!
Last edited: