• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Scientists Announce a Physical Warp Drive Is Now Possible. Seriously.

Snaploud

Admiral
Admiral
Scientists Announce a Physical Warp Drive Is Now Possible. Seriously.

Humans are one step closer to traveling at faster-than-light speeds.

By Caroline Delbert

Published: Dec 08, 2025 2:33 PM EST

This brings us to the new study, which scientists in the Advanced Propulsion Laboratory (APL) at Applied Physics just published in the peer-reviewed journal Classical and Quantum Gravity. In the report, the APL team unveils the world’s first model for a physical warp drive—one that doesn’t require negative energy.

The study is understandably pretty thick (read the whole thing here), but here’s the gist of the model: Where the existing paradigm uses negative energy—exotic matter that doesn’t exist and can’t be generated within our current understanding of the universe—this new concept uses floating bubbles of spacetime rather than floating ships in spacetime.


 
I see these all the time, and you’ll notice the linked paper is from 2021. Probably a slow news day. It’s nowhere on the foreseeable horizon, folks.

As a side comment, not actually about this — since at least it’s talking about reputable, actual science — is it just me, or has Popular Mechanics really diven into credulous woo in the last few years? I keep seeing things about consciousness altering the universe, Rupert Sheldrake suggesting stars are conscious, that sort of thing.
 
I see these all the time, and you’ll notice the linked paper is from 2021. Probably a slow news day. It’s nowhere on the foreseeable horizon, folks.

As a side comment, not actually about this — since at least it’s talking about reputable, actual science — is it just me, or has Popular Mechanics really diven into credulous woo in the last few years? I keep seeing things about consciousness altering the universe, Rupert Sheldrake suggesting stars are conscious, that sort of thing.
The consciousness thing is several decades old. Even John Archibald Wheeler mooted it. If one looks hard enough, I'm sure some ancient Greek philosopher, such as Parmenides or Zeno of Elea, had a similar notion.

Modifying inertial mass might not be a good idea. Atomic radius depends inversely on the inertial mass of the electron, so reducing your inertial mass might make you explode unless you were able to adjust the local values of the speed of light, Planck constant and fine structure constant to compensate. I don't know that creating a warp bubble would affect inertial mass inside the bubble, but Mach's principle suggests that it might. It's a rabbit hole I'm not prepared to go down. I'm not in any hurry to get to Proxima Centauri or even to go there at all, in fact.
 
If "reality" were all conscious states that could be instantiated, that would include both heaven and hell as well as all possible worlds. All sounds, music, poetry, novels, images, movie frames or anything perceivable together with emotional reaction exist somewhere and simultaneously within a hypothetical timeless yet finite quantum Library of Babel of possible conscious states that has sufficient resolution. FTL might then be a matter of creating entanglement between states. Exploring such a realm might take one to places best avoided. Excessive pleasure might be just as toxic as excessive anguish.

Just my somewhat silly suggestion...

ETA: Some movies about this and other philosophical themes:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
which means we can see real life verisons of star wars and star trek
Except perhaps nothing is real, including you and I. There is only illusion. Even if you kick the stone, its subsequent observed motion is merely a set of mental states in a Hilbert space that are associated with other states that identify as the kicker, even if he's Bishop Berkeley who would seek to refute the notion. It's an idea that has been itself kicked around for centuries.

I have no mouth and yet I want ice cream.
 
Last edited:
Then perhaps intentionality will give us warp drive yet.

Had math been reduced to axioms and Godel incorrect..no spooky action-at-a-distance, and--ironically enough--a more life-filled cosmos...such a mechanistic universe would forbid FTL even more loudly than this one, methinks.

I am still trying to see if tiny technology can put the quanta in quantized inertia.

Small coils maybe?

If crude frustums frustrate, shrink it or coils down enough for that quantum magic to work.

Come on kids, cheer enough and Worf can walk again with that new spine. Spin that salt shaker and win a prize, but don't look behind the curtain.

Such a boring universe described above would make a good prison for Warhammer deities and other overpowered beings...a preferable post FTL set up where Star systems are even safer from one another than here...a weakness universe perfect for fissionable waste dumping.
 
Last edited:
If a quantum computer can be constructed to simulate all possible quantum states of a 1.4 kg human brain with a radius of roughly 10 cm - as limited by the Bekenstein bound - there is no need for FTL. Why travel when everything you could possibly experience is immediately available? If you are worried about the Sun turning off the main sequence on to the giant branch, use stellar lifting to reduce its mass and extend its life span as a magnetically controlled red dwarf. Store the extracted matter to create a new star when the old one is finally extinguished. All you might achieve if you sought to colonise the galaxy might be to piss in someone else's pond. One can live off the embers of a white dwarf for a very long time.


Man has gone out to explore other worlds and other civilizations without having explored his own labyrinth of dark passages and secret chambers, and without finding what lies behind doorways that he himself has sealed.

We take off into the cosmos, ready for anything: for solitude, for hardship, for exhaustion, death. Modesty forbids us to say so, but there are times when we think pretty well of ourselves. And yet, if we examine it more closely, our enthusiasm turns out to be all a sham. We don't want to conquer the cosmos, we simply want to extend the boundaries of Earth to the frontiers of the cosmos. For us, such and such a planet is as arid as the Sahara, another as frozen as the North Pole, yet another as lush as the Amazon basin. We are humanitarian and chivalrous; we don't want to enslave other races, we simply want to bequeath them our values and take over their heritage in exchange. We think of ourselves as the Knights of the Holy Contact. This is another lie. We are only seeking Man.

We have no need of other worlds. We need mirrors. We don't know what to do with other worlds. A single world, our own, suffices us; but we can't accept it for what it is.

We are searching for an ideal image of our own world: we go in quest of a planet, a civilization superior to our own but developed on the basis of a prototype of our primeval past. At the same time, there is something inside us which we don't like to face up to, from which we try to protect ourselves, but which nevertheless remains, since we don't leave Earth in a state of primal innocence. We arrive here as we are in reality, and when the page is turned and that reality is revealed to us - that part of our reality which we would prefer to pass over in silence - then we don't like it anymore.
From Solaris by Stanisław Lem
 
Last edited:
Sabine Hossenfelder's opinion on the new warp drive proposal:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

I trust her analysis.
 
I like that look for a potential ship at least. I am compelled to agree with her.

I'd settle for Planet 9 as a tiny black hole. You could do something with that at least.
 
Last edited:
We know some laws of physics are violable in certain cases - for example, the universe is not space and time-translation invariant so momentum and energy are not always conserved, space-time can expand faster than the speed of light, the second law of thermodynamics is fundamentally statistical and permits local deviations, spontaneous symmetry breaking led to particles having inertial mass and travelling slower than the speed of light so that the passage of time could be experienced, and quantum tunnelling and entanglement occur and might even be fundamental to many biological processes. Perhaps what scientific advancement needs is not a genius but a shady lawyer.

Better call Saul?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top