We really don't need that sort of thing here, thanks.I've always joked that the salt vampire was Michelle Obama in its true form. Sorry, but their glaring snouts look so similar.
We really don't need that sort of thing here, thanks.I've always joked that the salt vampire was Michelle Obama in its true form. Sorry, but their glaring snouts look so similar.
Shatner himself appeared in one of the TZ's most famous eps.
This is a good overview of Forbidden Planet's influence on Star Trek:
https://startrekfactcheck.blogspot.com/2013/07/gene-roddenberrys-cinematic-influences.html
Robinson Crusoe on Mars is another interesting connection discussed in this link.
In the article "Where Sci-Fi Has Gone Before," they list several possible influences for Star Trek.
1. Flash Gordon Serials: Space Soldiers, Trip To Mars, Conquers The Universe
2. Rocketship X-M
3. Destination Moon
4. Conquest Of Space
5. Fire Maidens Of Outer Space (I talked about this)
6. Forbidden Planet (Ditto)
7. Queen Of Outer Space
8.The Angry Red Planet
9. Journey To The Seventh Planet
10. Lost In Space
Why do they assume that the only possible influences for Star Trek are movies and TV shows? Does nobody remember anymore that prose fiction exists?
Also, the subtitle for the magazine article was "Movies That Blazed The Trail For Star Trek."
Anyway, that's my point. That's two separate things choosing to look for screen inspirations to the exclusion of prose inspirations. As I said, that's overlooking a huge part of the equation, probably the more important part.
What I am looking for, what this thread is about, are the inspirations for Trek in the medium of moving pictures.
I just don't see the point in segregating the influences based on medium. There's a lot of interplay between screen and prose. The movies and shows that may have influenced Trek have literary influences on them in turn -- e.g. Forbidden Planet was inspired by The Tempest, and the literary antecedent of Robinson Crusoe on Mars is self-evident. So it seems to me that they're the same conversation, not two competing or mutually exclusive ones.
Besides, I often see people talk about the filmic influences on Trek, but not as much discussion about those pulp influences on Roddenberry that you mention. So I'm curious to know more about that less explored side of the question, and thus I want it to be included as well. A thread can grow beyond where it started.
Again, because that's what he chose to focus on, as he already said, multiple times now. Instead of exasperatingly repeating the same thing over and over again like everyone should follow your instructions by default, why don't you listen to him and let him do his own thing? He doesn't owe you any further explanation or compliance.Again, why separate them?
Again, because that's what he chose to focus on, as he already said, multiple times now. Instead of exasperatingly repeating the same thing over and over again like everyone should follow your instructions by default, why don't you listen to him and let him do his own thing? He doesn't owe you any further explanation or compliance.
Again, because that's what he chose to focus on, as he already said, multiple times now. Instead of exasperatingly repeating the same thing over and over again like everyone should follow your instructions by default, why don't you listen to him and let him do his own thing? He doesn't owe you any further explanation or compliance.
You come off very pushy sometimes, to put it mildly. You frequently start off your posts by saying "Again..." like you're annoyed that people aren't automatically buying what you're selling. It's not a competition, but the guy already answered you three times that he wanted to do a separate topic for cinematic and TV influences, so at some point you have to just let it go and let him do his own thing and accept that people aren't always going to do things the way you want.Huh? Why treat this as a competition? Like I said, they're parts of the same discussion, and it's natural for threads to grow beyond where they begin. I just don't understand the exclusionism. Where is there a conflict? I'm trying to add to the discussion, not fight against it. What is wrong with offering more?
I always had a soft spot for "This Island Earth"
I can see a bit of Trek in that.
Is "Destination Moon" the one that ends with everyone trapped in a recurring time loop ?
Destination Moon is basically the 1950s version of Apollo 11.
There are even more connections there. Shatner actually appeared in two episodes of TZ, "Nightmare at 20,000 Feet" and "Nick of Time," both of which were written by Richard Matheson, who also wrote "The Enemy Within" for TOS.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.