Well heres the design i was working on
![]()
The USS O'Bannon
![]()
Whatcha Think?![]()
The USS O'Bannon
![]()
Whatcha Think?![]()
Well heres the design i was working on
![]()
I like this. Looks like it could take on BSG!
Probably too tame by their standards.and also im surprised its on Shipschematics.net i didnt think it was worthy for that awesome starship schematic database![]()
Hi, Nathan - I included your Gadget Hackwrench because I love the sense of humor behind it. Too many times I've gotten serious submissions that have 50 nacelles and hundreds of phaser banks and torpedo tubes. When I see something like yours I have to include it. Kind of like this one too:
http://www.shipschematics.net/startrek/images//federation/hyperdreadnaught_overkill.jpg
![]()
http://www.cygnus-x1.net/links/lcars/vance.php
His old version is on that page - scroll to the bottom and look for "Toolkit Freebies" - 11 sheets total.
Frunze class battlecruiser
The Frunze class was designed as an upgrade to the Kirov class battlecruiser. Starfleet wanted to enhance the firepower as well as integrate the enhanced capabilities, that the second stern-mounted main sensor/deflector of the Federation class provided.
The nacelle orientation was tweaked on the prototype U.S.S. Frunze. Since no enhancement in the ships performance was detected, the regular nacelle orientation was used on all other ships of this class.
![]()
U.S.S. Orlan, second ship of the class.
![]()
This is a Sacramento Class ship which uses purpose built modules. There would be different modules that it could carry.
![]()
This is the same class ship with out the module. Also included is a side view of the hull with out the nacelles and pylons.
![]()
More like the predecessor to this: http://www.cygnus-x1.net/links/lcars/macpherson-class-heavy-transport.phpTOS Nebula indeed![]()
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.