Hmmm... a search of the board shows you've never used the terms "argumentative" or "cuss" prior to this message.I've said it before and I'll say it again; you're an argumentative little cuss.
Care to hyperbole again?

Hmmm... a search of the board shows you've never used the terms "argumentative" or "cuss" prior to this message.I've said it before and I'll say it again; you're an argumentative little cuss.
The AppleWasn't saucer seperation mentioned in TOS once? I have vague memory of Kirk ordering Scotty to prepare for it.
Hmmm... a search of the board shows you've never used the terms "argumentative" or "cuss" prior to this message.
Care to hyperbole again?![]()
The Apple
And?I got two likes on that comment, indicating that a couple of people agreed.
And?
Give it a rest.
IIRC a lot of the Galaxy class ships we saw in the Dominion war were unfinished ships- rushed into battle without most in the interior completed. They had engines and weapons, just no extras like science labs, extensive crew quarters, etc...No, just no.
Ships in Trek usually come with primary and secondary power sources.
Primary being: 1 Warp core (matter/antimatter reaction)
Secondary: Fusion generators (unknown amount of fusion generators).
There is also no reason to think stuffing more shield generators would improve the shields. In fact, I don't think you can actually do something like that.
Each ship comes with a primary and secondary shield generator (therefore there'd be a maximum of 2 - so if the primary system is down, the secondary would ideally take over assuming that's not damaged - you cannot run them at the same time to say improve shield power).
You improve the shields by improving the shield generator (aka type of shield you are generating, power efficiency, etc. - all of which would be done on existing piece of hw - which might be replaced if there comes a time you cannot upgrade or modify the original one - in which case the old one would be taken out, harvested for its resources and a new one built in its place).
The Galaxy class during the Dominion War would most certainly sport a new warp core (similar to one we saw the Ent-D getting or newer [maybe ones that the Sovereign class has even] - but without the flaws), two extra phaser strips (one on each nacelle) to increase coverage (length of the strip has nothing to do with phaser power output) - although, the USS Venture is to date the only Galaxy class seen with those phaser upgrades (but its very possible all Galaxy class ships had them... the VFX department just forgot to add them).
Upgrades to primary/secondary shield generators (obviously), upgrades to phaser power output, increase in Warp capability, etc. (that kind of thing).
IIRC a lot of the Galaxy class ships we saw in the Dominion war were unfinished ships- rushed into battle without most in the interior completed. They had engines and weapons, just no extras like science labs, extensive crew quarters, etc...
I sort of imagine there would be a learning process involved, even if the mechanical connections are identical. A visiting saucer might need a handshake two days long to get properly integrated, and even the ability to travel along as inert baggage might require several minutes if not hours of adaptation before the IDFs agree to talk to each other.
Timo Saloniemi
Saucer go whoosh.Saucer separation. How does it work exactly?
Saucer go whoosh.
If Troi's driving, there is afterwards.
[For the record, I have no idea what the big deal was about Troi being at the helm. The stardrive section exploding clearly was the cause of the saucer's resulting joyride, and I really doubt anyone could have done any different.]
As for saucers and stardrives being functionally interchangeable, it's not like they're built EXACTLY the same even if they were from the same blueprints. Acceptable manufacturing defects and very minute differences in the superstructure parts mean that while flightworthy, no two ships are EXACTLY the same. All the parts "work into" each other over time, to the point that you can't simply force two jigsaw puzzle pieces together even though they look practically the same - and even if you did, it wouldn't hold together all the OTHER pieces those two pieces are attached to. I suspect that there's a smidge of this happening, even in a future where parts are created and assembled within fractions of a nanometer.
Mark
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.